Errors in Diagnosing Types of Diabetes in Young Adult Patients – Constantly Valid Topic

A. Chwalba, A. Dudek
{"title":"Errors in Diagnosing Types of Diabetes in Young Adult Patients – Constantly Valid Topic","authors":"A. Chwalba, A. Dudek","doi":"10.31038/edmj.2020421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid accumulation of clinical Abstract The correct differentiation of diabetes types is still a problem. This is especially true for groups of young adult patients between 20 and 55 years old. In this group of patients Type 2 diabetes is still routinely diagnosed, without a thorough analysis of the patient’s history, phenotype, as well as disregarding the need to perform all necessary laboratory tests. Such diagnostic irregularities lead to taking wrong therapeutic decisions. As far as the patient’s history is concerned, attention should be paid to the incidence or non-incidence of a positive history of diabetes in the patient’s family. In the autoimmune diabetes such incidence usually does not occur. In Type 2 diabetes it is usually high, whereas most often it occurs on the patient’s mother’s and well as father’s side. A feature that is usually very characteristic is high incidence on one side of the family, typical for monogenic diabetes. A very important indicator is the occurrence or non-occurrence of obesity. Clear obesity suggests the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, whereas in patients without obesity LADA or MODY diabetes needs to be taken into account. Conclusive in this respect are the results of tests checking the levels of C-peptide and the titre of autoantibodies, predominantly of a/GAD. When MODY diabetes is suspected, it is necessary to run genetic tests. It is extremely important to undertake efforts aiming at a correct diagnosis of the etiological cause of diabetes, i.e. determining whether we deal with the autoimmunization process, insulin resistance, or with a genetic defect, as it influences therapeutic decisions. In the presence of the autoimmunization process, it is recommended to provide the insulin therapy at an early stage. In patients with clearly marked insulin resistance an early onset of the insulin therapy should be avoided. The first choice drugs in this condition are metformin, incretin drugs, as well as drugs from the group of SGLT-2 inhibitors. In monogenic diabetes therapeutic decisions depend on the type of the genetic defect.","PeriodicalId":72911,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2020421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid accumulation of clinical Abstract The correct differentiation of diabetes types is still a problem. This is especially true for groups of young adult patients between 20 and 55 years old. In this group of patients Type 2 diabetes is still routinely diagnosed, without a thorough analysis of the patient’s history, phenotype, as well as disregarding the need to perform all necessary laboratory tests. Such diagnostic irregularities lead to taking wrong therapeutic decisions. As far as the patient’s history is concerned, attention should be paid to the incidence or non-incidence of a positive history of diabetes in the patient’s family. In the autoimmune diabetes such incidence usually does not occur. In Type 2 diabetes it is usually high, whereas most often it occurs on the patient’s mother’s and well as father’s side. A feature that is usually very characteristic is high incidence on one side of the family, typical for monogenic diabetes. A very important indicator is the occurrence or non-occurrence of obesity. Clear obesity suggests the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, whereas in patients without obesity LADA or MODY diabetes needs to be taken into account. Conclusive in this respect are the results of tests checking the levels of C-peptide and the titre of autoantibodies, predominantly of a/GAD. When MODY diabetes is suspected, it is necessary to run genetic tests. It is extremely important to undertake efforts aiming at a correct diagnosis of the etiological cause of diabetes, i.e. determining whether we deal with the autoimmunization process, insulin resistance, or with a genetic defect, as it influences therapeutic decisions. In the presence of the autoimmunization process, it is recommended to provide the insulin therapy at an early stage. In patients with clearly marked insulin resistance an early onset of the insulin therapy should be avoided. The first choice drugs in this condition are metformin, incretin drugs, as well as drugs from the group of SGLT-2 inhibitors. In monogenic diabetes therapeutic decisions depend on the type of the genetic defect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青年糖尿病患者诊断类型的错误-持续有效的话题
快速积累的临床摘要糖尿病类型的正确鉴别仍然是一个问题。对于20至55岁的年轻成年患者群体来说尤其如此。在这组患者中,2型糖尿病仍然是常规诊断的,没有对患者的病史、表型进行彻底分析,也没有考虑进行所有必要的实验室测试的必要性。这种诊断上的不规则会导致做出错误的治疗决定。就患者的病史而言,应注意患者家族中糖尿病阳性史的发生率或非发生率。在自身免疫性糖尿病中,这种发病率通常不会发生。在2型糖尿病中,它通常很高,而最常见的是发生在患者母亲和父亲一侧。一个通常很有特点的特征是家族中一方的发病率很高,这是单基因糖尿病的典型特征。一个非常重要的指标是肥胖的发生与否。明确的肥胖表明诊断为2型糖尿病,而在没有肥胖的患者中,需要考虑LADA或MODY糖尿病。这方面的结论是检查C肽水平和自身抗体(主要是a/GAD)滴度的测试结果。当怀疑患有MODY型糖尿病时,有必要进行基因检测。致力于正确诊断糖尿病的病因是极其重要的,即确定我们是处理自身免疫过程、胰岛素抵抗还是基因缺陷,因为它会影响治疗决策。在存在自身免疫过程的情况下,建议在早期阶段提供胰岛素治疗。对于胰岛素抵抗明显的患者,应避免早期开始胰岛素治疗。这种情况下的首选药物是二甲双胍、肠促胰岛素药物以及SGLT-2抑制剂组的药物。单基因糖尿病的治疗决定取决于基因缺陷的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern of Presentation of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus Among Sudanese Patients The Role of Endocrine Mediators in the Neurodegeneration and Synaptic Dysfunction of Depressive Illness In their Own Language: Communicating Health to Boost Compliance for Weight Loss and Diabetes Modifiable Risk Factors and the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome among Women with and without a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Ambidirectional Cohort Study from Pakistan Neuroprotective Effects of a Serotonin Receptor Peptide Following Sham vs. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Zucker Rat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1