Exchange rate volatility and trade flows in Indonesia and ten main trade partners: asymmetric effects

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Studies in Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1108/sef-10-2021-0451
Unggul Heriqbaldi, M. A. Esquivias, R. Handoyo, Alfira Cahyaning Rifami, Hilda Rohmawati
{"title":"Exchange rate volatility and trade flows in Indonesia and ten main trade partners: asymmetric effects","authors":"Unggul Heriqbaldi, M. A. Esquivias, R. Handoyo, Alfira Cahyaning Rifami, Hilda Rohmawati","doi":"10.1108/sef-10-2021-0451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis paper aims to examine whether Indonesian cross-border trade responds asymmetrically to exchange rate volatility (ERV).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn exponential generalized autorgressive conditional heteroscedasticity model is applied to estimate the ERV of Indonesia and ten main trade partners using quarterly data from 2006 to 2020. A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag estimation is applied to estimate the impact of ERV on cross-border trade. Impacts from the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic are covered. Dynamic panel data is used for the robustness test.\n\n\nFindings\nIn the short-run, ERV significantly affects exports to most of the top partners (positively, negatively or both). In the long run, asymmetric effects occur in Indonesia’s exports to five top destinations. The weakening of the Indonesian Rupiah mainly supports exports in the short term. Imports from top partners are also affected by ERV in both the short run and, to a lesser extent, in the long run. Both the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic reduced trade: for most cases, in the short run. The dynamic panel model suggests that ERV has asymmetric impact on cross-border trade in the long run.\n\n\nPractical implications\nExchange rate strategies need to avoid a single-side policy approach and, instead, account for exporter and importer differences in risk behaviour and an asymmetric response to ERV in trade. Policymakers need to consider policies that stabilise the currency.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides evidence that cross-border trade can react asymmetrically to the exchange rate uncertainty and that the impacts of real ERV are asymmetric as well. The authors also apply a dynamic panel that signals that ERV matters in the long run for Indonesian trade with top partners.","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-10-2021-0451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine whether Indonesian cross-border trade responds asymmetrically to exchange rate volatility (ERV). Design/methodology/approach An exponential generalized autorgressive conditional heteroscedasticity model is applied to estimate the ERV of Indonesia and ten main trade partners using quarterly data from 2006 to 2020. A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag estimation is applied to estimate the impact of ERV on cross-border trade. Impacts from the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic are covered. Dynamic panel data is used for the robustness test. Findings In the short-run, ERV significantly affects exports to most of the top partners (positively, negatively or both). In the long run, asymmetric effects occur in Indonesia’s exports to five top destinations. The weakening of the Indonesian Rupiah mainly supports exports in the short term. Imports from top partners are also affected by ERV in both the short run and, to a lesser extent, in the long run. Both the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic reduced trade: for most cases, in the short run. The dynamic panel model suggests that ERV has asymmetric impact on cross-border trade in the long run. Practical implications Exchange rate strategies need to avoid a single-side policy approach and, instead, account for exporter and importer differences in risk behaviour and an asymmetric response to ERV in trade. Policymakers need to consider policies that stabilise the currency. Originality/value This study provides evidence that cross-border trade can react asymmetrically to the exchange rate uncertainty and that the impacts of real ERV are asymmetric as well. The authors also apply a dynamic panel that signals that ERV matters in the long run for Indonesian trade with top partners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚和十个主要贸易伙伴的汇率波动和贸易流动:不对称效应
目的本文旨在检验印尼跨境贸易是否对汇率波动(ERV)做出不对称反应。设计/方法/方法利用2006年至2020年的季度数据,应用指数广义自回归条件异方差模型估计印度尼西亚和十个主要贸易伙伴的ERV。采用非线性自回归分布滞后估计方法来估计ERV对跨境贸易的影响。涵盖了2008年全球金融危机和新冠肺炎大流行的影响。动态面板数据用于稳健性测试。发现从短期来看,ERV显著影响了对大多数顶级合作伙伴的出口(积极、消极或两者兼有)。从长远来看,印尼对五大目的地的出口会出现不对称效应。印尼盾走弱主要在短期内支持出口。从短期和长期来看,来自顶级合作伙伴的进口也受到ERV的影响。全球金融危机和新冠肺炎大流行都减少了贸易:在大多数情况下,短期内。动态面板模型表明,ERV对跨境贸易的长期影响是不对称的。实际含义汇率策略需要避免单边政策方法,而是考虑到出口商和进口商在风险行为方面的差异以及贸易中对ERV的不对称反应。政策制定者需要考虑稳定货币的政策。原创性/价值这项研究提供了证据,证明跨境贸易对汇率不确定性的反应是不对称的,实际ERV的影响也是不对称的。作者还应用了一个动态面板,该面板表明,从长远来看,ERV对印尼与顶级合作伙伴的贸易很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling exogenous shocks, financial stress and US economic performance Influence of Ukrainian refugees on the exchange rate and stock market in neighboring countries How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach The ups and downs of oil prices: asymmetric impacts of oil price volatility on corporate environmental responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1