Determinants of support for directly-elected mayors in Ireland

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Irish Political Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI:10.1080/07907184.2021.1975966
Luke Field
{"title":"Determinants of support for directly-elected mayors in Ireland","authors":"Luke Field","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2021.1975966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In May 2019, three Irish local authorities ran plebiscites alongside their local elections: Cork City Council, Limerick City and County Council, and Waterford City and County Council. The plebiscites were run to judge support for Government proposals to introduce a reformed, directly-elected mayoral office. The results were, in some ways, the worst possible from a Government perspective: a mix. While voters in Limerick backed the plan by a slight majority, it was marginally rejected in both Cork and Waterford. Faced with disappointing a large group of voters no matter the course of action taken, the Government shelved the plans for Cork and Waterford indefinitely, though the plan for Limerick may proceed. Despite the 2019 rejections, the 2020 UCD Online Election Poll (INES 1) found indications of high levels of support for these reforms: four-in-five respondents agreed that mayors should be directly elected, which is a significantly higher proportion than the Yes vote in any of the three plebiscite areas. This research uses further data from the online poll to establish correlates of support for these reforms, and tentatively suggests that partisan dynamics in turnout are why this support wasn’t reflected in the plebiscite results.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1975966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In May 2019, three Irish local authorities ran plebiscites alongside their local elections: Cork City Council, Limerick City and County Council, and Waterford City and County Council. The plebiscites were run to judge support for Government proposals to introduce a reformed, directly-elected mayoral office. The results were, in some ways, the worst possible from a Government perspective: a mix. While voters in Limerick backed the plan by a slight majority, it was marginally rejected in both Cork and Waterford. Faced with disappointing a large group of voters no matter the course of action taken, the Government shelved the plans for Cork and Waterford indefinitely, though the plan for Limerick may proceed. Despite the 2019 rejections, the 2020 UCD Online Election Poll (INES 1) found indications of high levels of support for these reforms: four-in-five respondents agreed that mayors should be directly elected, which is a significantly higher proportion than the Yes vote in any of the three plebiscite areas. This research uses further data from the online poll to establish correlates of support for these reforms, and tentatively suggests that partisan dynamics in turnout are why this support wasn’t reflected in the plebiscite results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持爱尔兰直选市长的决定因素
摘要2019年5月,爱尔兰三个地方政府在举行地方选举的同时举行了公民投票:科克市议会、利默里克市和县议会以及沃特福德市和县议员。公民投票是为了判断政府提议设立改革后的直选市长办公室的支持程度。在某些方面,从政府的角度来看,结果可能是最糟糕的:一种混合。虽然利默里克的选民以微弱多数支持该计划,但科克和沃特福德的选民都略微拒绝了该计划。无论采取何种行动,面对大批选民的失望,政府无限期搁置了科克和沃特福德的计划,尽管利默里克的计划可能会继续进行。尽管2019年遭到拒绝,但2020年UCD在线选举民意调查(INES 1)发现,有迹象表明,人们对这些改革的支持率很高:五分之四的受访者同意市长应该直接选举,这一比例明显高于三个公民投票区中任何一个地区的赞成票。这项研究使用了来自在线民意调查的进一步数据来确定支持这些改革的相关性,并初步表明,投票率的党派动态是这种支持没有反映在公民投票结果中的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 Industry and policy in independent Ireland, 1922–1972 , by Frank Barry, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 256pp., £70.00/€83.00 (print), £58.00/€70.00 (ebook), ISBN: 0198878230 ‘It is only by political means that we can hope for … success’: Éamon de Valera’s long climb back to power, 1922–32 Obstetric violence and consent during pregnancy and childbirth: the Eighth Amendment and its impact on the Irish maternity system Mistrust: conservative rhetoric in the Oireachtas 2018 abortion debates Direct democracy and party behaviour in the Republic of Ireland: a campaign finance perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1