Geopolitical risk and corporate tax behavior: international evidence

IF 1.8 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Managerial Finance Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1108/ijmf-10-2022-0428
Vishnu K. Ramesh, A. Athira
{"title":"Geopolitical risk and corporate tax behavior: international evidence","authors":"Vishnu K. Ramesh, A. Athira","doi":"10.1108/ijmf-10-2022-0428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examines the association between geopolitical risk (GPR) and corporate tax, which is a major source of revenue for the government and a significant explicit cost for firms. The authors use a comprehensive measure of GPR to study its effects on corporate taxes by using an international sample.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt the geopolitical measure constructed by Caldara and Iacoviello (2022) as a proxy for GPR and cash-effective tax rate benchmarked with statutory tax rate to measure corporate tax avoidance. The authors employ panel regression with fixed effects (FEs) to investigate the impact of GPR on corporate tax avoidance. The authors also conduct a battery of robustness tests to ensure the strength of the study’s results.FindingsThis study’s empirical results indicate that sample firms increase their tax avoidance amid increasing GPR. Further analyses show that financial constraints incentivize firms to avoid taxes during rising geopolitical tensions. The authors also provide evidence on the role of firm-level and country-level governance in weakening the association between GPR and tax avoidance.Practical implicationsPolicymakers and governments may strengthen the enforcement rule to limit aggressive tax practices of corporates during GPR to balance fiscal deficit. In addition, this study sheds light on the debate among administrators and politicians over the efficacy of current tax laws and governance structures in the presence of heightened GPR.Originality/valueThe authors extend the literature on GPR by analyzing its effect on corporate tax avoidance. Unlike existing single-country studies, the authors use a cross-country setup to investigate the impact of GPR on tax avoidance, making this study’s results more generalizable as the authors control for a host of country, industry, and time factors. Apart from political uncertainty, terrorism, and climatic issues, the authors document GPR as a strong macroeconomic driver of corporate tax avoidance. The authors make a new contribution to the literature on the moderating role of governance and institutional factors on the association between tax avoidance and GPR in an international context. The authors also contribute to the literature on macroeconomic determinants of tax avoidance.","PeriodicalId":51698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-10-2022-0428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the association between geopolitical risk (GPR) and corporate tax, which is a major source of revenue for the government and a significant explicit cost for firms. The authors use a comprehensive measure of GPR to study its effects on corporate taxes by using an international sample.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt the geopolitical measure constructed by Caldara and Iacoviello (2022) as a proxy for GPR and cash-effective tax rate benchmarked with statutory tax rate to measure corporate tax avoidance. The authors employ panel regression with fixed effects (FEs) to investigate the impact of GPR on corporate tax avoidance. The authors also conduct a battery of robustness tests to ensure the strength of the study’s results.FindingsThis study’s empirical results indicate that sample firms increase their tax avoidance amid increasing GPR. Further analyses show that financial constraints incentivize firms to avoid taxes during rising geopolitical tensions. The authors also provide evidence on the role of firm-level and country-level governance in weakening the association between GPR and tax avoidance.Practical implicationsPolicymakers and governments may strengthen the enforcement rule to limit aggressive tax practices of corporates during GPR to balance fiscal deficit. In addition, this study sheds light on the debate among administrators and politicians over the efficacy of current tax laws and governance structures in the presence of heightened GPR.Originality/valueThe authors extend the literature on GPR by analyzing its effect on corporate tax avoidance. Unlike existing single-country studies, the authors use a cross-country setup to investigate the impact of GPR on tax avoidance, making this study’s results more generalizable as the authors control for a host of country, industry, and time factors. Apart from political uncertainty, terrorism, and climatic issues, the authors document GPR as a strong macroeconomic driver of corporate tax avoidance. The authors make a new contribution to the literature on the moderating role of governance and institutional factors on the association between tax avoidance and GPR in an international context. The authors also contribute to the literature on macroeconomic determinants of tax avoidance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地缘政治风险与企业税收行为:国际证据
目的本研究考察了地缘政治风险(GPR)与企业税之间的关系,企业税是政府的主要收入来源,也是企业的显著显性成本。作者使用GPR的综合衡量方法,通过使用国际样本来研究其对公司税的影响。设计/方法/方法作者采用Caldara和Iacoviello(2022)构建的地缘政治指标作为GPR和以法定税率为基准的现金有效税率的代表,来衡量企业避税行为。作者采用具有固定效应的面板回归(FE)来研究GPR对公司避税的影响。作者还进行了一系列稳健性测试,以确保研究结果的强度。研究结果本研究的实证结果表明,样本企业在GPR增加的同时,避税行为也在增加。进一步的分析表明,在地缘政治紧张局势加剧的情况下,财务约束会激励企业避税。作者还提供了证据,证明企业层面和国家层面的治理在削弱GPR与避税之间的联系方面发挥了作用。实际含义政策制定者和政府可能会加强执行规则,以限制企业在GPR期间的激进税收行为,从而平衡财政赤字。此外,本研究揭示了行政人员和政界人士在GPR.Originality/value提高的情况下对现行税法和治理结构效力的争论。作者通过分析GPR对公司避税的影响来扩展有关GPR的文献。与现有的单一国家研究不同,作者使用跨国设置来调查GPR对避税的影响,这使得本研究的结果更具普遍性,因为作者控制了许多国家、行业和时间因素。除了政治不确定性、恐怖主义和气候问题外,作者还将GPR记录为企业避税的强大宏观经济驱动因素。作者对国际背景下治理和制度因素对避税和GPR之间关系的调节作用的文献做出了新的贡献。作者还为有关避税的宏观经济决定因素的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Treasury and Financial Risk Management ■Redefining, measuring and identifying new methods to manage risk for financing decisions ■The role, costs and benefits of insurance and hedging financing decisions ■The role of rating agencies in managerial decisions Investment and Financing Decision Making ■The uses and applications of forecasting to examine financing decisions measurement and comparisons of various financing options ■The public versus private financing decision ■The decision of where to be publicly traded - including comparisons of market structures and exchanges ■Short term versus long term portfolio management - choice of securities (debt vs equity, convertible vs non-convertible)
期刊最新文献
Examining the Indonesian dual banking system: an exploration of market discipline indicators CEO compensation and bank’s performance following bank-rescue Does corporate sustainability performance matter for cash holdings? International evidence Nonfinancial 8-K disclosures and individual investors' trading during earnings announcement window Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics: evidence from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1