From Antigone to Mother Courage: The Quest for “Lyricism and Societal Truth”

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/10848770.2022.2157284
Peter Zazzali
{"title":"From Antigone to Mother Courage: The Quest for “Lyricism and Societal Truth”","authors":"Peter Zazzali","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2022.2157284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every so often the field of theatre is gifted with an extraordinary artist whose work inspires a generation of colleagues and students. Heinz-Uwe Haus is one such example, as evidenced by his contributions to Cypriot and Greek theatre over the past forty-seven years. Since his 1975 staging of Brecht’s Caucasian Chalk Circle in Nicosia, his oeuvre as a director/scholar/teacher has changed lives and reimagined theatre’s sociopolitical role in these two countries. Uwe Haus’s illustrious career as such is resourcefully cataloged in Heinz-Uwe Haus and Theatre Making in Cyprus and Greece. The book opens with a lengthy yet informative Introduction that puts Haus’s work in Cyprus and Greece in perspective. It is organized in four parts that include a conversation with his co-editor Meyer-Dinkgräfe, as well as well as a section entitled “Brecht’s ‘Use Value’ and Aristotle’s Artistic Proof.’” While the Introduction neither signals nor explains the book’s trajectory, it effectively contextualizes the “indelible mark” that Haus has left on Cypriot and Greek theatre (32). Meyer-Dinkgräfe’s interview offers an overview of Haus’s work in Greece and Cyprus, wherein the latter recounts his harrowing experiences in dealing with the Stasi and German Democratic Republic (CDR), his country of origin and where he has been living for most of his life. His tireless advocacy for liberalism unleashed a “creative force” that has been germane to his aesthetic (3). It is little wonder that Brecht became the benchmark of Haus’s theatre-making. Transferring Brechtian principles to his productions in Cyprus and Greece would be especially important to him and became the genesis of this book. As such, the monograph is jointly an artistic and political enterprise. Haus’s comparison of Brecht and Aristotle proves as much in that he positions the social and philosophical ethos of the latter in relationship to the artistry of his contemporary and fellow German. The opening chapter recounts Haus’s Brechtian productions in Greece between 1975 and 1990. From The Caucasian Chalk Circle and Mother Courage to The Good Person of Szechuan and The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui, Haus and Dinkgräfe source reviews and testimonials that provide a remarkable archive of Brechtian performance under the former’s direction. It is a treatise offering insights into his expert staging of Brecht’s","PeriodicalId":55962,"journal":{"name":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","volume":"28 1","pages":"405 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2022.2157284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every so often the field of theatre is gifted with an extraordinary artist whose work inspires a generation of colleagues and students. Heinz-Uwe Haus is one such example, as evidenced by his contributions to Cypriot and Greek theatre over the past forty-seven years. Since his 1975 staging of Brecht’s Caucasian Chalk Circle in Nicosia, his oeuvre as a director/scholar/teacher has changed lives and reimagined theatre’s sociopolitical role in these two countries. Uwe Haus’s illustrious career as such is resourcefully cataloged in Heinz-Uwe Haus and Theatre Making in Cyprus and Greece. The book opens with a lengthy yet informative Introduction that puts Haus’s work in Cyprus and Greece in perspective. It is organized in four parts that include a conversation with his co-editor Meyer-Dinkgräfe, as well as well as a section entitled “Brecht’s ‘Use Value’ and Aristotle’s Artistic Proof.’” While the Introduction neither signals nor explains the book’s trajectory, it effectively contextualizes the “indelible mark” that Haus has left on Cypriot and Greek theatre (32). Meyer-Dinkgräfe’s interview offers an overview of Haus’s work in Greece and Cyprus, wherein the latter recounts his harrowing experiences in dealing with the Stasi and German Democratic Republic (CDR), his country of origin and where he has been living for most of his life. His tireless advocacy for liberalism unleashed a “creative force” that has been germane to his aesthetic (3). It is little wonder that Brecht became the benchmark of Haus’s theatre-making. Transferring Brechtian principles to his productions in Cyprus and Greece would be especially important to him and became the genesis of this book. As such, the monograph is jointly an artistic and political enterprise. Haus’s comparison of Brecht and Aristotle proves as much in that he positions the social and philosophical ethos of the latter in relationship to the artistry of his contemporary and fellow German. The opening chapter recounts Haus’s Brechtian productions in Greece between 1975 and 1990. From The Caucasian Chalk Circle and Mother Courage to The Good Person of Szechuan and The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui, Haus and Dinkgräfe source reviews and testimonials that provide a remarkable archive of Brechtian performance under the former’s direction. It is a treatise offering insights into his expert staging of Brecht’s
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从安提戈涅到勇气母亲:对“抒情与社会真理”的探索
戏剧领域不时涌现出一位非凡的艺术家,他的作品激励了一代同事和学生。海因茨·乌韦·豪斯就是这样一个例子,他在过去四十七年中对塞浦路斯和希腊戏剧的贡献就是明证。自1975年在尼科西亚上演布莱希特的《高加索粉笔圈》以来,他作为导演/学者/教师的作品改变了这两个国家的生活,并重新想象了戏剧的社会政治角色。乌韦·豪斯杰出的职业生涯被资源丰富地收录在《海因茨·乌韦·豪斯》和《塞浦路斯和希腊的戏剧制作》中。这本书以一篇冗长而翔实的引言开篇,对豪斯在塞浦路斯和希腊的作品进行了透视。它分为四个部分,其中包括与他的联合编辑Meyer Dinkgräfe的对话,以及题为“布莱希特的‘使用价值’和亚里士多德的艺术证明”的部分。虽然引言既没有表明也没有解释这本书的轨迹,但它有效地将豪斯在塞浦路斯和希腊戏剧上留下的“不可磨灭的印记”置于背景中(32)。Meyer Dinkgräfe的采访概述了豪斯在希腊和塞浦路斯的工作,后者讲述了他在与斯塔西和德意志民主共和国打交道时的悲惨经历,他的原籍国以及他一生中大部分时间都生活在那里。他对自由主义的不懈倡导释放了一股与他的美学密切相关的“创造力”(3)。难怪布莱希特成为豪斯戏剧创作的标杆。将布莱希特原则转移到他在塞浦路斯和希腊的作品中对他来说尤其重要,并成为本书的起源。因此,这部专著既是一部艺术作品,也是一部政治作品。豪斯对布莱希特和亚里士多德的比较也证明了这一点,他将后者的社会和哲学精神与当代德国同胞的艺术联系起来。开篇叙述了豪斯1975年至1990年间在希腊创作的布莱希特作品。从《高加索粉笔圈》和《勇气母亲》到《四川好人》和《阿图罗·乌伊的反抗崛起》,豪斯和丁克格拉夫的评论和证词为布莱希特在前者的指导下的表演提供了一个引人注目的档案。这是一篇论文,提供了他对布莱希特
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊最新文献
Meeting a Hero Grandmother Zofia’s Table Symphony as Event: The Significance of Political Philosophy On Aging: A Personal Account Joseph Brodsky and the Aesthetic Origins of Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1