Physical Therapy in Addition to Standard of Care Improves Patient Satisfaction and Recovery Post-cesarean Section

J. Stone, Katie Skibiski, Sarah K. Hwang, C. Barnes
{"title":"Physical Therapy in Addition to Standard of Care Improves Patient Satisfaction and Recovery Post-cesarean Section","authors":"J. Stone, Katie Skibiski, Sarah K. Hwang, C. Barnes","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Cesarean section represents the most commonly performed inpatient surgical procedure in the United States. The few studies currently available regarding the role of physical therapy in postoperative recovery only look at the first few days or weeks postpartum. The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to assess the impact of physical therapy post-cesarean delivery and to serve as a potential basis for future research. Objective: To evaluate the short- and long-term impact of an individualized, comprehensive physical therapy program on post-cesarean delivery recovery. Study Design: Unblinded randomized controlled trial. Methods: The intervention group went through an individualized 6-week physical therapy program, which included in-clinic treatment and home exercises in addition to usual postoperative care. Outcome measures used were a visual pain rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and self-rated exercise confidence scale. Results: Seventy-two participants were included in final analysis. Satisfaction was significantly higher at 14 weeks (P = .048) and 6 months (P = .047) in the intervention group. Pain rating was significantly lower at 14 weeks (P = .049) in the intervention group. A significant change was found between baseline and 14-week/6-month follow up for Oswestry (P < .0001), patient satisfaction (P = .024), and self-efficacy with exercise (P = .034) in the intervention group. A significant main effect for self-efficacy with exercise (P = .025) in the intervention group was found at all time points compared with standard of care. Significant differences between variables were found for the Oswestry intervention group [8-14 weeks (P = .003), 8 weeks to 6 months (P = .001), and 8 weeks to 1 year (P = .007)] and the standard of care group [8 weeks to 6 months (P = .001) and 8 weeks to 1 year (P = .006)]. Conclusions: Participants who received physical therapy had significantly improved outcomes compared with the standard of care group. This suggests that physical therapy may be a helpful adjunct to cesarean delivery recovery, although larger studies should be done for definitive conclusions.","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"10 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Cesarean section represents the most commonly performed inpatient surgical procedure in the United States. The few studies currently available regarding the role of physical therapy in postoperative recovery only look at the first few days or weeks postpartum. The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to assess the impact of physical therapy post-cesarean delivery and to serve as a potential basis for future research. Objective: To evaluate the short- and long-term impact of an individualized, comprehensive physical therapy program on post-cesarean delivery recovery. Study Design: Unblinded randomized controlled trial. Methods: The intervention group went through an individualized 6-week physical therapy program, which included in-clinic treatment and home exercises in addition to usual postoperative care. Outcome measures used were a visual pain rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and self-rated exercise confidence scale. Results: Seventy-two participants were included in final analysis. Satisfaction was significantly higher at 14 weeks (P = .048) and 6 months (P = .047) in the intervention group. Pain rating was significantly lower at 14 weeks (P = .049) in the intervention group. A significant change was found between baseline and 14-week/6-month follow up for Oswestry (P < .0001), patient satisfaction (P = .024), and self-efficacy with exercise (P = .034) in the intervention group. A significant main effect for self-efficacy with exercise (P = .025) in the intervention group was found at all time points compared with standard of care. Significant differences between variables were found for the Oswestry intervention group [8-14 weeks (P = .003), 8 weeks to 6 months (P = .001), and 8 weeks to 1 year (P = .007)] and the standard of care group [8 weeks to 6 months (P = .001) and 8 weeks to 1 year (P = .006)]. Conclusions: Participants who received physical therapy had significantly improved outcomes compared with the standard of care group. This suggests that physical therapy may be a helpful adjunct to cesarean delivery recovery, although larger studies should be done for definitive conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在护理标准之外的物理治疗可提高患者满意度和剖宫产术后的恢复
文本中提供了补充数字内容。背景:剖宫产是美国最常见的住院手术。目前为数不多的关于物理治疗在术后恢复中的作用的研究只关注产后最初几天或几周。这项试点随机对照试验的目的是评估剖宫产后物理治疗的影响,并作为未来研究的潜在基础。目的:评价个体化综合物理治疗方案对剖宫产术后恢复的短期和长期影响。研究设计:无盲随机对照试验。方法:干预组进行了为期6周的个性化物理治疗计划,除了常规的术后护理外,还包括临床治疗和家庭锻炼。使用的结果测量是视觉疼痛评定量表、奥斯韦斯特里残疾指数、患者满意度问卷和自评运动信心量表。结果:72名参与者被纳入最终分析。干预组在14周(P=0.048)和6个月(P=0.047)时的满意度显著较高。干预组在14周时疼痛评分显著降低(P=0.049)。干预组的Oswestry(P<.0001)、患者满意度(P=.024)和运动自我效能感(P=.034)在基线和14周/6个月随访之间发生了显著变化。与护理标准相比,干预组在所有时间点的运动自我效能感都有显著的主要影响(P=0.025)。Oswestry干预组[8-14周(P=0.003)、8周至6个月(P=0.001)和8周至1年(P=0.007)]和标准护理组[8周至6月(P=0.0001)和8周到1年(P=.006)]的变量之间存在显著差异护理小组。这表明物理治疗可能是剖宫产恢复的一个有用的辅助手段,尽管应该进行更大规模的研究以得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Running Gait Retraining in the Management of a Multiparous Runner With Chronic Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Case Study New Name, New Format! APTA 2023 Combined Sections Meeting Posters and Platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1