Idiosyncratic information and the cost of equity capital: A meta-analytic review of the literature

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting Literature Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acclit.2018.07.001
Max Schreder
{"title":"Idiosyncratic information and the cost of equity capital: A meta-analytic review of the literature","authors":"Max Schreder","doi":"10.1016/j.acclit.2018.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides a quantitative review of the literature on the repercussions of idiosyncratic information on firms’ cost of equity (CoE) capital. In total, I review the results of 113 unique studies examining the CoE effects of information <em>Quantity</em>, <em>Precision</em> and <em>Asymmetry</em>. My results suggest that the association between firm-specific information and CoE is subject to moderate effects. First, the link between <em>Quantity</em> and CoE is moderated by disclosure types and country-level factors in that firms in comparatively weakly regulated countries tend to enjoy up to four times greater CoE benefits from more expansive disclosure—depending on the type of disclosure—than firms in strongly regulated markets. Second, a negative relationship between <em>Precision</em> and CoE is only significant in studies using non-accrual quality proxies for <em>Precision</em> and risk factor-based (RFB)/valuation model-based (VMB) proxies for CoE. Third, almost all VMB studies confirm the positive association between <em>Asymmetry</em> and CoE, but there is notable variation in the conclusions reached when <em>ex post</em> CoE measurers are used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Literature","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 142-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737460717301192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper provides a quantitative review of the literature on the repercussions of idiosyncratic information on firms’ cost of equity (CoE) capital. In total, I review the results of 113 unique studies examining the CoE effects of information Quantity, Precision and Asymmetry. My results suggest that the association between firm-specific information and CoE is subject to moderate effects. First, the link between Quantity and CoE is moderated by disclosure types and country-level factors in that firms in comparatively weakly regulated countries tend to enjoy up to four times greater CoE benefits from more expansive disclosure—depending on the type of disclosure—than firms in strongly regulated markets. Second, a negative relationship between Precision and CoE is only significant in studies using non-accrual quality proxies for Precision and risk factor-based (RFB)/valuation model-based (VMB) proxies for CoE. Third, almost all VMB studies confirm the positive association between Asymmetry and CoE, but there is notable variation in the conclusions reached when ex post CoE measurers are used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特质资讯与股权资本成本:文献的元分析回顾
本文对有关特殊信息对企业股权成本(CoE)资本影响的文献进行了定量回顾。总的来说,我回顾了113项研究的结果,这些研究检验了信息量、精确度和不对称性的CoE效应。我的研究结果表明,企业特定信息和CoE之间的关联受到适度的影响。首先,数量和CoE之间的联系受到披露类型和国家层面因素的调节,监管相对较弱的国家的公司往往比监管严格的市场中的公司从更广泛的披露中获得高达四倍的CoE收益(取决于披露类型)。其次,精度和CoE之间的负相关关系仅在使用非应计质量代理精度和基于风险因素(RFB)/基于估值模型(VMB)代理CoE的研究中才显着。第三,几乎所有的VMB研究都证实了不对称与CoE之间的正相关,但当使用事后CoE测量时,得出的结论存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal is to publish papers that make a fundamental and substantial contribution to the understanding of accounting phenomena. To this end, the Journal intends to publish papers that (1) synthesize an area of research in a concise and rigorous manner to assist academics and others to gain knowledge and appreciation of diverse research areas or (2) present high quality, multi-method, original research on a broad range of topics relevant to accounting, auditing and taxation. Topical coverage is broad and inclusive covering virtually all aspects of accounting. Consistent with the historical mission of the Journal, it is expected that the lead article of each issue will be a synthesis article on an important research topic. Other manuscripts to be included in a given issue will be a mix of synthesis and original research papers. In addition to traditional research topics and methods, we actively solicit manuscripts of the including, but not limited to, the following: • meta-analyses • field studies • critiques of papers published in other journals • emerging developments in accounting theory • commentaries on current issues • innovative experimental research with strong grounding in cognitive, social or anthropological sciences • creative archival analyses using non-standard methodologies or data sources with strong grounding in various social sciences • book reviews • "idea" papers that don''t fit into other established categories.
期刊最新文献
Ontological basis of the creative accounting phenomenon as a financial misstatement The valuation and determinants of franking account balances Unveiling the hidden symphony: board dynamics and carbon emission disclosure – a meta-analysis study in the realm of developed markets Trade-based money laundering: a systematic literature review Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1