F. McCormack, Richard Machin, Victoria Riley, K. Spyropoulos, K. Dunn, C. Gidlow
{"title":"Building legal literacy in organisations that support people experiencing multiple disadvantage","authors":"F. McCormack, Richard Machin, Victoria Riley, K. Spyropoulos, K. Dunn, C. Gidlow","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2023.2175548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We present a case study of specialist welfare advice and advocacy for people experiencing multiple disadvantage (i.e. a combination of homelessness, contact with the criminal justice system, substance misuse, mental ill health). Drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with staff and stakeholders, we demonstrate the need for, and success of, specialist benefits advice for this customer group. Substantial financial gains were awarded, providing a greater level of security and stability, which increased customers’ housing options. We highlight a need for greater recognition across organisations that work with customers experiencing multiple disadvantage, that welfare benefits are a legal entitlement. Implications for policy and practice are discussed, including the importance of: developing confidence and a ‘law informed’ mindset in frontline staff; advisors building relationships with staff to achieve this; preparatory work with partner organisations to develop a shared understanding of what is involved and expectations. Ultimately, a culture of legal literacy must be cultivated at the individual (frontline staff) and organisational (partner host) levels. Stakeholders had concerns about the future of such initiatives in the context of further funding cuts; there is a risk that legal literacy development programmes become marginalised at a time when they are most needed.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":"45 1","pages":"11 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2175548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present a case study of specialist welfare advice and advocacy for people experiencing multiple disadvantage (i.e. a combination of homelessness, contact with the criminal justice system, substance misuse, mental ill health). Drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with staff and stakeholders, we demonstrate the need for, and success of, specialist benefits advice for this customer group. Substantial financial gains were awarded, providing a greater level of security and stability, which increased customers’ housing options. We highlight a need for greater recognition across organisations that work with customers experiencing multiple disadvantage, that welfare benefits are a legal entitlement. Implications for policy and practice are discussed, including the importance of: developing confidence and a ‘law informed’ mindset in frontline staff; advisors building relationships with staff to achieve this; preparatory work with partner organisations to develop a shared understanding of what is involved and expectations. Ultimately, a culture of legal literacy must be cultivated at the individual (frontline staff) and organisational (partner host) levels. Stakeholders had concerns about the future of such initiatives in the context of further funding cuts; there is a risk that legal literacy development programmes become marginalised at a time when they are most needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law is concerned with social and family law and policy in a UK, European and international context. The policy of the Editors and of the Editorial Board is to provide an interdisciplinary forum to which academics and professionals working in the social welfare and related fields may turn for guidance, comment and informed debate. Features: •Articles •Cases •European Section •Current Development •Ombudsman"s Section •Book Reviews