Voyage of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Using Multiparametric Flow Cytometry

N. Das, Ritu Gupta
{"title":"Voyage of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Using Multiparametric Flow Cytometry","authors":"N. Das, Ritu Gupta","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM) has emerged as one of the strongest and independent biomarkers to evaluate therapeutic response for the prediction of long-term treatment outcome. With the incorporation of MRD in response assessment criterion by International Myeloma Working Group, it has become the routine parameter to be assessed at various time points after therapy. Among various techniques to assess MRD, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC)-based MRD estimation has evolved dramatically over the last two decades achieving sensitivity comparable to molecular methods. Next-generation flow cytometry with the incorporation of innovative tools in MRD detection including consortium-based guidelines for preanalytical and analytical factors led to the overall improvement in MFC-based MRD detection. However, flow cytometry assays suffer from inherent challenges ranging from procedural hemodilution to lack of harmonization and standardization across the centers. This review article outlines and summarizes the essential laboratory prerequisites for reproducible MRD analysis by flow cytometry. Furthermore, a brief account of the utility of MRD evaluation in clinical practice as predictor of response and long-term treatment outcome has also been discussed. Considering the evolution of MFC-based MRD over two decades from a scientific research tool to a routine clinical diagnostic assay, it needs to be explored further in studying complex phenomenon like clonal evolution, clonal switches, and identification of treatment refractory clones for guiding more effective therapies improving overall survival.","PeriodicalId":13513,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM) has emerged as one of the strongest and independent biomarkers to evaluate therapeutic response for the prediction of long-term treatment outcome. With the incorporation of MRD in response assessment criterion by International Myeloma Working Group, it has become the routine parameter to be assessed at various time points after therapy. Among various techniques to assess MRD, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC)-based MRD estimation has evolved dramatically over the last two decades achieving sensitivity comparable to molecular methods. Next-generation flow cytometry with the incorporation of innovative tools in MRD detection including consortium-based guidelines for preanalytical and analytical factors led to the overall improvement in MFC-based MRD detection. However, flow cytometry assays suffer from inherent challenges ranging from procedural hemodilution to lack of harmonization and standardization across the centers. This review article outlines and summarizes the essential laboratory prerequisites for reproducible MRD analysis by flow cytometry. Furthermore, a brief account of the utility of MRD evaluation in clinical practice as predictor of response and long-term treatment outcome has also been discussed. Considering the evolution of MFC-based MRD over two decades from a scientific research tool to a routine clinical diagnostic assay, it needs to be explored further in studying complex phenomenon like clonal evolution, clonal switches, and identification of treatment refractory clones for guiding more effective therapies improving overall survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用多参数流式细胞术评估多发性骨髓瘤的可测量残余疾病(MRD)
摘要多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的可测量残余疾病(MRD)已成为评估治疗反应以预测长期治疗结果的最强和独立的生物标志物之一。随着国际骨髓瘤工作组将MRD纳入反应评估标准,它已成为治疗后不同时间点评估的常规参数。在评估MRD的各种技术中,基于多参数流式细胞术(MFC)的MRD估计在过去二十年中发生了巨大的变化,实现了与分子方法相当的灵敏度。下一代流式细胞术在MRD检测中引入了创新工具,包括基于联盟的预分析和分析因子指南,从而全面改进了基于MFC的MRD检测。然而,流式细胞术检测面临着固有的挑战,从程序性血液稀释到各中心缺乏协调和标准化。这篇综述文章概述并总结了通过流式细胞术进行可重复MRD分析的基本实验室先决条件。此外,还简要介绍了MRD评估在临床实践中作为反应和长期治疗结果的预测指标的效用。考虑到20多年来基于MFC的MRD从一种科学研究工具演变为常规临床诊断分析,它需要在研究克隆进化、克隆转换和鉴定治疗难治性克隆等复杂现象方面进行进一步探索,以指导更有效的治疗,提高整体生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to medical and pediatric oncology in human well being including ethical and social issues. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Crizotinib Readministration in Patients with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement: Case Report and Review of Literature Advanced Pediatric-Type Follicular Lymphoma, Consequences of a Late Presentation in a Resource-Poor Setting: Case Report and Literature Review Renal Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor in an Infant: Case Report with Review of Literature Primary Resistance to ALK Inhibitors in a Patient with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement: A Case Report with Review of Literature Approach to Diagnosis of BCR::ABL1 -Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1