Temporal trend of opioid and nonopioid pain medications: results from a national in-home survey, 2001 to 2018

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001010
Yun Wang, Dan Wu, A. Chan, Chih-Hung Chang, V. Lee, M. Nichol
{"title":"Temporal trend of opioid and nonopioid pain medications: results from a national in-home survey, 2001 to 2018","authors":"Yun Wang, Dan Wu, A. Chan, Chih-Hung Chang, V. Lee, M. Nichol","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Introduction: The opioid epidemic persists in the United States. The use of opioid medications is often assessed by claims data but potentially underestimated. Objectives: We evaluated the temporal trend in the use of opioid and nonopioid pain medications from a national survey. Methods: Using data from the 2001 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we examined the current use of prescription analgesics in the past 30 days among 50,201 respondents aged 20 years or older. Joinpoint regressions were used to test statistically meaningful trends of opioid vs nonopioid analgesics. Results: The mean percentage of people who had pain medications in the past 30 days was 6.4% (5.3%-7.1%) for opioid and 11.3% (9.0%-14.8%) for nonopioid analgesics. The availability of opioid and nonopioid prescriptions at home has remained stable, except for the slight decline of opioids among cancer-free patients in 2005 to 2018. The most frequently used opioid analgesic medications included hydrocodone/acetaminophen, tramadol, and hydrocodone. Conclusion: We uniquely measured the proportion of people who had opioid and nonopioid pain medications at home in the United States and supplemented the previous knowledge of prescription rates mainly obtained from claims data.","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Abstract Introduction: The opioid epidemic persists in the United States. The use of opioid medications is often assessed by claims data but potentially underestimated. Objectives: We evaluated the temporal trend in the use of opioid and nonopioid pain medications from a national survey. Methods: Using data from the 2001 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we examined the current use of prescription analgesics in the past 30 days among 50,201 respondents aged 20 years or older. Joinpoint regressions were used to test statistically meaningful trends of opioid vs nonopioid analgesics. Results: The mean percentage of people who had pain medications in the past 30 days was 6.4% (5.3%-7.1%) for opioid and 11.3% (9.0%-14.8%) for nonopioid analgesics. The availability of opioid and nonopioid prescriptions at home has remained stable, except for the slight decline of opioids among cancer-free patients in 2005 to 2018. The most frequently used opioid analgesic medications included hydrocodone/acetaminophen, tramadol, and hydrocodone. Conclusion: We uniquely measured the proportion of people who had opioid and nonopioid pain medications at home in the United States and supplemented the previous knowledge of prescription rates mainly obtained from claims data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类和非阿片类止痛药的时间趋势:2001年至2018年全国家庭调查结果
文本中提供了补充数字内容。摘要简介:阿片类药物在美国持续流行。阿片类药物的使用通常通过索赔数据进行评估,但可能被低估。目的:我们从一项全国性调查中评估了阿片类和非阿片类止痛药使用的时间趋势。方法:使用2001年至2018年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)的数据,我们调查了50201名20岁或以上受访者在过去30天内处方止痛药的使用情况。联合点回归用于检验阿片类止痛药与非阿片类镇痛药的统计学意义趋势。结果:在过去30天内服用止痛药的平均百分比为6.4%(5.3%-7.1%)的阿片类药物和11.3%(9.0%-14.8%)的非阿片类止痛药。除了2005年至2018年无癌症患者中的阿片类药物略有下降外,国内阿片类和非阿片类处方的供应保持稳定。最常用的阿片类镇痛药物包括氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚、曲马多和氢可酮。结论:我们独特地测量了在美国家中服用阿片类和非阿片类止痛药的比例,并补充了之前主要从索赔数据中获得的处方率知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preexisting chronic pain is not associated with moderate-to-severe acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Why might fears and worries persist after a pain education-grounded multimodal intervention for chronic back pain? A qualitative study. Pain and small fiber pathology in men with fibromyalgia syndrome. Upregulated spinal histone deacetylases induce nociceptive sensitization by inhibiting the GABA system in chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathy in rats. Integrated manual therapies: IASP taskforce viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1