Knowledge among patients about postoperative home self-care following cataract surgery in Northern and Western India

SG Prem Kumar, Shobhana Chavan, Dhanaji Ranpise, Pankaj Vishwakarma, E. Kurian
{"title":"Knowledge among patients about postoperative home self-care following cataract surgery in Northern and Western India","authors":"SG Prem Kumar, Shobhana Chavan, Dhanaji Ranpise, Pankaj Vishwakarma, E. Kurian","doi":"10.4103/jcor.jcor_47_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Inadequate knowledge of patients regarding postoperative home self-care can result in numerous complications and poor visual outcomes. We investigated the knowledge levels of patients on home self-care precautions postdischarge and suggested ways to improve these. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study used a random sample from six partner hospitals in north and west India. Patient's knowledge regarding postoperative home self-care was assessed in three domains (i) general eye care precautions (GECP), (ii) eye cleaning procedures (ECP), and (iii) instilling medications in the eye (IME). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 616 patients provided interviews and visual acuity (VA) assessments. The median ages were 65 and 63 years for males and females, respectively. Postsurgery, an overwhelming number had either very good or good VA (91.2%). Overall, the knowledge levels were “moderately adequate” for GECP at 57.9%. However, “inadequate” knowledge levels were found pertaining to ECP and IME domains with 69.8% and 84.3%, respectively. With multiple logistic regression, female patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–4.2) were significantly more likely to have moderate to adequate knowledge of GECP. Those attending both the postoperative review visits were significantly more likely to have moderate to adequate knowledge of ECP (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.4) and IME (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8–2.7), respectively. Conclusion: Knowledge levels were moderately adequate for GECP, while inadequate for ECP and IME domains, respectively. Strategies to improve patient participation in postoperative review visits and improve patient education modalities are recommended and discussed.","PeriodicalId":33073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"172 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcor.jcor_47_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inadequate knowledge of patients regarding postoperative home self-care can result in numerous complications and poor visual outcomes. We investigated the knowledge levels of patients on home self-care precautions postdischarge and suggested ways to improve these. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study used a random sample from six partner hospitals in north and west India. Patient's knowledge regarding postoperative home self-care was assessed in three domains (i) general eye care precautions (GECP), (ii) eye cleaning procedures (ECP), and (iii) instilling medications in the eye (IME). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 616 patients provided interviews and visual acuity (VA) assessments. The median ages were 65 and 63 years for males and females, respectively. Postsurgery, an overwhelming number had either very good or good VA (91.2%). Overall, the knowledge levels were “moderately adequate” for GECP at 57.9%. However, “inadequate” knowledge levels were found pertaining to ECP and IME domains with 69.8% and 84.3%, respectively. With multiple logistic regression, female patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–4.2) were significantly more likely to have moderate to adequate knowledge of GECP. Those attending both the postoperative review visits were significantly more likely to have moderate to adequate knowledge of ECP (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.4) and IME (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8–2.7), respectively. Conclusion: Knowledge levels were moderately adequate for GECP, while inadequate for ECP and IME domains, respectively. Strategies to improve patient participation in postoperative review visits and improve patient education modalities are recommended and discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度北部和西部白内障手术后患者的家庭自我护理知识
目的:患者对术后家庭自我护理的认识不足会导致许多并发症和视力不良。我们调查了患者出院后家庭自我护理注意事项的知识水平,并提出了改善这些知识的方法。材料和方法:本横断面研究使用了来自印度北部和西部六家合作医院的随机样本。患者对术后家庭自我护理的知识在三个方面进行了评估(i)一般眼科护理预防措施(GECP), (ii)眼睛清洁程序(ECP)和(iii)向眼睛内灌注药物(IME)。使用结构化问卷收集数据。结果:616例患者接受了访谈和视力(VA)评估。男性和女性的中位年龄分别为65岁和63岁。术后绝大多数患者VA非常好或良好(91.2%)。总体而言,对GECP的知识水平为57.9%,为“中等”。然而,与ECP和IME领域相关的知识水平“不足”的比例分别为69.8%和84.3%。通过多元logistic回归,女性患者(优势比[OR]为2.7,95%可信区间[CI]为1.8-4.2)对GECP有中度至充分认识的可能性显著增加。参加两次术后复查的患者更有可能分别对ECP (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.4)和IME (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.7)有中度至充分的了解。结论:GECP知识水平适中,ECP和IME知识水平分别不足。建议并讨论了提高患者参与术后复查和改善患者教育模式的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 and Ocular Surface Disease Index in assessing dry eye symptoms Modulation transfer function and higher order aberrations with and without corneo scleral lens in an eye with keratoconus Typical cytomegalovirus retinitis in non-human immunodeficiency virus partially immunosuppressed patients: A case series To study visual evoked potential in patients with optic nerve diseases Corneal morphology following use of Malyugin versus B-hex pupil expansion rings in small pupil phacoemulsification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1