Determinants of Well-being for Developing and Developed Countries and their Role in Policy-making: A Panel Data Analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2019-06-10 DOI:10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.5
J. Ng, Santha Vaithilingam, Jing Moon Chua
{"title":"Determinants of Well-being for Developing and Developed Countries and their Role in Policy-making: A Panel Data Analysis","authors":"J. Ng, Santha Vaithilingam, Jing Moon Chua","doi":"10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gross domestic product has been the traditional indicator used to measure economic growth, with almost every country having national policies that are growth-centric in nature. Underlying this practice is the assumption that higher income levels precede higher levels of utility, or well-being. However, the Easterlin paradox discovered by Easterlin in the 1970s contradicts this economic assumption and has subsequently ignited interest in the study of subjective well-being and its determinants. Using the countries’ responses to the life satisfaction question in the World Values Survey as the measure of subjective well-being over a period of time, this study utilises panel data techniques to identify the key determinants of life satisfaction for developing and developed countries. The study also determines the relative importance of these key determinants for the two groups of countries. The findings of this study show that the determinants of life satisfaction differ across developed and developing countries, with religiosity being the only common determinant. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gross domestic product has been the traditional indicator used to measure economic growth, with almost every country having national policies that are growth-centric in nature. Underlying this practice is the assumption that higher income levels precede higher levels of utility, or well-being. However, the Easterlin paradox discovered by Easterlin in the 1970s contradicts this economic assumption and has subsequently ignited interest in the study of subjective well-being and its determinants. Using the countries’ responses to the life satisfaction question in the World Values Survey as the measure of subjective well-being over a period of time, this study utilises panel data techniques to identify the key determinants of life satisfaction for developing and developed countries. The study also determines the relative importance of these key determinants for the two groups of countries. The findings of this study show that the determinants of life satisfaction differ across developed and developing countries, with religiosity being the only common determinant. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家和发达国家福祉的决定因素及其在政策制定中的作用:面板数据分析
国内生产总值(gdp)一直是衡量经济增长的传统指标,几乎每个国家都有以增长为中心的国家政策。这种做法背后的假设是,更高的收入水平先于更高的效用或福祉水平。然而,伊斯特林在20世纪70年代发现的伊斯特林悖论与这一经济假设相矛盾,并随后引发了对主观幸福感及其决定因素研究的兴趣。利用各国对世界价值观调查中生活满意度问题的回答作为一段时间内主观幸福感的衡量标准,本研究利用面板数据技术来确定发展中国家和发达国家生活满意度的关键决定因素。该研究还确定了这些关键决定因素对两类国家的相对重要性。这项研究的结果表明,生活满意度的决定因素在发达国家和发展中国家有所不同,宗教信仰是唯一共同的决定因素。讨论了这些发现的政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1