Job satisfaction among NHS and private orthotists: a cross-sectional comparative study

K. Prosser, N. Achour
{"title":"Job satisfaction among NHS and private orthotists: a cross-sectional comparative study","authors":"K. Prosser, N. Achour","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2021.0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The orthotic profession is facing a national staff shortage, which has been compounded by high attrition rates. Overall, 70% of NHS orthotic services in the UK are subcontracted out to private companies, but there has been little investigation of how this has affected job satisfaction and intention to remain in the profession among orthotists. This study evaluated and compared job satisfaction among orthotists employed by the NHS and private organisations. A mixed-methods, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted. A total of 123 orthotists (36 employed by the NHS, 82 employed privately) completed an online questionnaire comprising 32 questions regarding their working conditions and job satisfaction, with a combination of free-text and 5-point Likert scale formats. Quantitative analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 24), with P≤0.05 indicating significance. Over a third (37.4%, n=46) of respondents indicated that they would leave the orthotic profession if they could. The strongest predicting variable for intent to leave was how well staff felt that they were treated by their employer. Respondents consistently reported that their working environments were poor, but this was worse for those who were privately employed. Overall job satisfaction was low in both groups. The orthotic profession may be facing a staff retention crisis. Employers should focus on improving working environments and ensuring that staff feel appreciated. Further research is required to investigate the impact of these issues on patient care.","PeriodicalId":35342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2021.0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The orthotic profession is facing a national staff shortage, which has been compounded by high attrition rates. Overall, 70% of NHS orthotic services in the UK are subcontracted out to private companies, but there has been little investigation of how this has affected job satisfaction and intention to remain in the profession among orthotists. This study evaluated and compared job satisfaction among orthotists employed by the NHS and private organisations. A mixed-methods, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted. A total of 123 orthotists (36 employed by the NHS, 82 employed privately) completed an online questionnaire comprising 32 questions regarding their working conditions and job satisfaction, with a combination of free-text and 5-point Likert scale formats. Quantitative analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 24), with P≤0.05 indicating significance. Over a third (37.4%, n=46) of respondents indicated that they would leave the orthotic profession if they could. The strongest predicting variable for intent to leave was how well staff felt that they were treated by their employer. Respondents consistently reported that their working environments were poor, but this was worse for those who were privately employed. Overall job satisfaction was low in both groups. The orthotic profession may be facing a staff retention crisis. Employers should focus on improving working environments and ensuring that staff feel appreciated. Further research is required to investigate the impact of these issues on patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国民保健服务和私人矫形师的工作满意度:一项横断面比较研究
骨科行业正面临着全国员工短缺的问题,而高流失率又加剧了这一问题。总体而言,英国70%的NHS矫形服务被分包给私营公司,但很少有调查表明,这是如何影响矫形师的工作满意度和留在这个行业的意愿的。本研究评估并比较了NHS和私人机构所雇用的矫形师的工作满意度。采用混合方法进行横断面比较研究。共有123名矫形师(36名受雇于NHS, 82名受雇于私人)完成了一份在线问卷,其中包括32个问题,涉及他们的工作条件和工作满意度,结合了自由文本和5点李克特量表格式。采用Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 24)进行定量分析,P≤0.05为显著性。超过三分之一(37.4%,n=46)的受访者表示,如果可以的话,他们会离开矫形专业。离职意向的最强预测变量是员工感觉自己受到雇主的待遇有多好。受访者一致表示,他们的工作环境很差,但对于那些私人雇员来说,情况更糟。两组的总体工作满意度都很低。矫形专业可能面临员工保留危机。雇主应该专注于改善工作环境,确保员工感到受到重视。需要进一步的研究来调查这些问题对病人护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Healthcare Management (BJHCM) is the independent monthly journal which is essential reading for all health service managers, policymakers, influencers and commentators. Launched in 1995, BJHCM mixes peer-reviewed management articles with interviews, analysis and comment to bring you a sharp, topical and valuable insight into what"s happening in and around the NHS. To reflect the way that the NHS is changing, the journal has recently received a major face-lift and several new features now appear alongside BJHCM"s excellent state-of-the-art review articles and celebrated columnists.
期刊最新文献
In memory of monica duncan, 1950–2023 Does switching from tobacco to reduced-risk products free up hospital resources? Value-based pricing of add-on life-extending medicines based on economic evaluation Sociodemographic determinants of structural empowerment and organisational commitment among critical care nurses in Saudi Arabia: a comparative cross-sectional study One-fifth of adults in England will have a major illness by 2040: a reflection for healthcare managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1