Deny, Reassure, and Deflect: Evidence and Implications of Forms and Norms of Fat Talk

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Cross-Cultural Research Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1177/10693971231199373
Cindi Sturtzsreetharan, Monet Ghorbani, A. Brewis, A. Wutich
{"title":"Deny, Reassure, and Deflect: Evidence and Implications of Forms and Norms of Fat Talk","authors":"Cindi Sturtzsreetharan, Monet Ghorbani, A. Brewis, A. Wutich","doi":"10.1177/10693971231199373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fat talk is a conversational interaction recognized through comments like “Does this make me look fat?” In the US, based on psychological lab-based investigations, fat talk is defined as highly damaging for women and actively targeted for various interventions. Using a discourse completion task (DCT), we present normative responses ( N = 313) to fat talk prompts testing women’s fat talk patterns across diverse languages and socio-cultural contexts. Based on replies from the DCT deployed in seven countries, we find that the normative response in all sites is always denial (“No, you aren’t!”) and often followed by additional reassurance (“you look good”). The consistency of findings suggests fat talk is an emergent global conversational form with shared, recognized rules among casual acquaintances. The normative denial response suggests positive functions where interactional fat talk reaffirms and reassures peer affiliation and membership. Ultimately, we suggest that fat talk may serve as a mundane rejection of everyday fatphobia; interventions posing fat talk as always harmful may simply reaffirm experiences of fat stigma by attempting to restrict the interpretation to only negative.","PeriodicalId":47154,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971231199373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fat talk is a conversational interaction recognized through comments like “Does this make me look fat?” In the US, based on psychological lab-based investigations, fat talk is defined as highly damaging for women and actively targeted for various interventions. Using a discourse completion task (DCT), we present normative responses ( N = 313) to fat talk prompts testing women’s fat talk patterns across diverse languages and socio-cultural contexts. Based on replies from the DCT deployed in seven countries, we find that the normative response in all sites is always denial (“No, you aren’t!”) and often followed by additional reassurance (“you look good”). The consistency of findings suggests fat talk is an emergent global conversational form with shared, recognized rules among casual acquaintances. The normative denial response suggests positive functions where interactional fat talk reaffirms and reassures peer affiliation and membership. Ultimately, we suggest that fat talk may serve as a mundane rejection of everyday fatphobia; interventions posing fat talk as always harmful may simply reaffirm experiences of fat stigma by attempting to restrict the interpretation to only negative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
否认、安抚与转移:肥胖谈话形式与规范的证据与启示
肥胖谈话是一种对话互动,通过诸如“这会让我看起来胖吗?”之类的评论来识别。在美国,根据基于心理实验室的调查,肥胖谈话被定义为对女性的高度伤害,并积极针对各种干预措施。使用话语完成任务(DCT),我们提出了对肥胖谈话提示的规范性反应(N=313),测试了不同语言和社会文化背景下女性的肥胖谈话模式。根据部署在七个国家的DCT的回复,我们发现所有网站的规范回复总是否认(“不,你不是!”),然后往往是额外的保证(“你看起来很好”)。研究结果的一致性表明,肥胖谈话是一种新兴的全球对话形式,在普通熟人之间有着共同的、公认的规则。规范性的否认反应表明,互动式的肥胖言论重申并保证了同伴关系和成员身份,具有积极的作用。最终,我们认为肥胖言论可能是对日常肥胖恐惧症的一种世俗拒绝;将肥胖言论视为总是有害的干预措施可能只是通过试图将解释限制在负面来重申肥胖污名化的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cross-Cultural Research
Cross-Cultural Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Cross-Cultural Research, formerly Behavior Science Research, is sponsored by the Human Relations Area Files, Inc. (HRAF) and is the official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research. The mission of the journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles describing cross-cultural or comparative studies in all the social/behavioral sciences and other sciences dealing with humans, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, economics, human ecology, and evolutionary biology. Worldwide cross-cultural studies are particularly welcomed, but all kinds of systematic comparisons are acceptable so long as they deal explicity with cross-cultural issues pertaining to the constraints and variables of human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Cultural Correlates of Adult Attachment Dimensions: Comparing the US and Turkey Regional Variation in Social Norms and Domestic Anti-Immigrant Hostility COVID-19 and Social Distancing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Interpersonal Distance Preferences and Touch Behaviors Before and During the Pandemic Populism and Protest Intensity: A Cross-National Analysis Relationships Between Response Styles and the Hofstede and GLOBE Dimensions of Culture in a Sample of Adolescents From 33 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1