Original observational study on disparate treatments for achalasia experienced by patients of white British and South Asian ethnicity

A. Farrukh, J. Mayberry
{"title":"Original observational study on disparate treatments for achalasia experienced by patients of white British and South Asian ethnicity","authors":"A. Farrukh, J. Mayberry","doi":"10.21037/AOE-20-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To date, there have been no studies which have considered whether treatments for achalasia are delivered equitably to different communities within a multi-ethnic society. Methods: Thirteen Trusts across England were sent Freedom of Information requests to provide information on admissions for achalasia between 2010 and 2019. Data were requested for patients of White British and South Asian ethnicity together with treatment details. Trusts which provided complete data were distinguished from those quoting numbers as <10 or <5 and results analysed separately. Treatment types were compared and correlation with deprivation sought. Results: In those Trusts which provided a detailed response there was a significant difference in the pattern of treatment between White British and South Asian patients. ( χ 2 =9.56, P<0.05). 27% of South Asian patients underwent surgical management in the form of a myotomy compared to 19% of White British patients. South Asian patients were significantly more likely to undergo a POEM procedure than White British patients (z=−3.12, P<0.01). Confirmation of a different pattern of treatment was seen in the second group of Trusts where there was a maximum of 865 admissions for treatment of achalasia. When the possible maximum number of patients treated during the decade was considered, significance was comparable ( χ 2 =7.59, P<0.05). If the minimum number of admissions of 736 was considered, then χ 2 =15.77, P<0.001. Deprivation was separately correlated with number of procedures per patient for both White British ethnicity (r s =0.733, P<0.05) and South Asian ethnicity (r s =0.686, P<0.05), indicating this was not the cause of disparate treatment. Conclusions: Patients with achalasia, who are South Asian, receive a different pattern of treatment to White British patients. They were 8% more likely to undergo a surgical form of management and 6% less likely to receive Botulinum toxin therapy. They are more likely to have a POEM procedure in inexperienced centres. In deprived communities both South Asian and White British patients are less likely to receive multiple therapies for long-term management of the disease.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-20-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, there have been no studies which have considered whether treatments for achalasia are delivered equitably to different communities within a multi-ethnic society. Methods: Thirteen Trusts across England were sent Freedom of Information requests to provide information on admissions for achalasia between 2010 and 2019. Data were requested for patients of White British and South Asian ethnicity together with treatment details. Trusts which provided complete data were distinguished from those quoting numbers as <10 or <5 and results analysed separately. Treatment types were compared and correlation with deprivation sought. Results: In those Trusts which provided a detailed response there was a significant difference in the pattern of treatment between White British and South Asian patients. ( χ 2 =9.56, P<0.05). 27% of South Asian patients underwent surgical management in the form of a myotomy compared to 19% of White British patients. South Asian patients were significantly more likely to undergo a POEM procedure than White British patients (z=−3.12, P<0.01). Confirmation of a different pattern of treatment was seen in the second group of Trusts where there was a maximum of 865 admissions for treatment of achalasia. When the possible maximum number of patients treated during the decade was considered, significance was comparable ( χ 2 =7.59, P<0.05). If the minimum number of admissions of 736 was considered, then χ 2 =15.77, P<0.001. Deprivation was separately correlated with number of procedures per patient for both White British ethnicity (r s =0.733, P<0.05) and South Asian ethnicity (r s =0.686, P<0.05), indicating this was not the cause of disparate treatment. Conclusions: Patients with achalasia, who are South Asian, receive a different pattern of treatment to White British patients. They were 8% more likely to undergo a surgical form of management and 6% less likely to receive Botulinum toxin therapy. They are more likely to have a POEM procedure in inexperienced centres. In deprived communities both South Asian and White British patients are less likely to receive multiple therapies for long-term management of the disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国白人和南亚裔患者对贲门失弛缓症不同治疗的原始观察研究
背景:迄今为止,还没有研究考虑到在多民族社会中,对失弛缓症的治疗是否公平地提供给不同的社区。方法:在2010年至2019年期间,向英格兰各地的13个信托机构发送了信息自由请求,以提供贲门失弛缓症的入院信息。要求英国白人和南亚族裔患者的数据以及治疗细节。将提供完整数据的信托与引用数字<10或<5的信托区分开来,并对结果进行单独分析。比较治疗类型并寻求与剥夺的相关性。结果:在那些提供详细答复的信托机构中,英国白人和南亚患者的治疗模式有显著差异。(χ 2 =9.56, p <0.05)。27%的南亚患者接受了肌切开术的手术治疗,而英国白人患者的这一比例为19%。南亚患者比英国白人患者更有可能接受POEM手术(z= - 3.12, P<0.01)。第二组信托基金证实了一种不同的治疗模式,其中最多有865人入院治疗失弛缓症。考虑10年内可能的最大治疗人数,差异具有可比性(χ 2 =7.59, P<0.05)。如果考虑最小入院人数736人,则χ 2 =15.77, P<0.001。剥夺分别与英国白人(r s =0.733, P<0.05)和南亚种族(r s =0.686, P<0.05)的每位患者的手术次数相关,表明这不是导致不同治疗的原因。结论:南亚贲门失弛缓症患者接受的治疗模式与英国白人患者不同。他们接受手术治疗的可能性增加8%,接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的可能性减少6%。他们更有可能在没有经验的中心进行POEM手术。在贫困社区,南亚和英国白人患者都不太可能接受多种长期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1