Some reflections on the way ahead for UK private international law after Brexit

P. Beaumont
{"title":"Some reflections on the way ahead for UK private international law after Brexit","authors":"P. Beaumont","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2021.1894757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1 January 2021 the UK has moved out of the implementation period for its withdrawal from the European Union (EU) and it is an appropriate time to reflect on the way forward for the UK in developing private international law. This article considers the practical steps that the UK should take in the near future. There is significant work that the UK can do to progress its commitment to the “progressive unification of the rules of private international law” by improving its commitment to the effective functioning of several key Conventions concluded by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Some of these steps can and should be taken immediately, notably accepting the accessions of other States to the Hague Evidence and Child Abduction Conventions and extending the scope of the UK’s ratification of the Adults Convention to England and Wales, and Northern Ireland. Other things require more consultation and time but there are great opportunities to provide leadership in the world by ratifying the Hague Judgments Convention 2019 and, when implementing that Convention which is based on minimum harmonisation, providing leadership in the Commonwealth by implementing, at least to some extent, the Commonwealth Model Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments. Within the UK, as a demonstration of best constitutional practice, intergovernmental cooperation between the UK Government and the devolved administrations should take place to consider how intra-UK private international law could be reformed learning the lessons from the UK Supreme Court’s highly divided decision in Villiers. Such work should involve the best of the UK’s experts (from each of its systems of law) on private international law from academia, the judiciary and legal practice. Doing so, would avoid accusations that Brexit will see a UK run by generalists who give too little attention and weight to the views of experts. This use of experts should also extend to the UK’s involvement in the future work of HCCH at all levels. The HCCH will only be able to be an effective international organisation if its Members show a commitment to harnessing the talents of experts in the subject within the work of the HCCH.","PeriodicalId":44028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Private International Law","volume":"17 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441048.2021.1894757","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Private International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2021.1894757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since 1 January 2021 the UK has moved out of the implementation period for its withdrawal from the European Union (EU) and it is an appropriate time to reflect on the way forward for the UK in developing private international law. This article considers the practical steps that the UK should take in the near future. There is significant work that the UK can do to progress its commitment to the “progressive unification of the rules of private international law” by improving its commitment to the effective functioning of several key Conventions concluded by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Some of these steps can and should be taken immediately, notably accepting the accessions of other States to the Hague Evidence and Child Abduction Conventions and extending the scope of the UK’s ratification of the Adults Convention to England and Wales, and Northern Ireland. Other things require more consultation and time but there are great opportunities to provide leadership in the world by ratifying the Hague Judgments Convention 2019 and, when implementing that Convention which is based on minimum harmonisation, providing leadership in the Commonwealth by implementing, at least to some extent, the Commonwealth Model Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments. Within the UK, as a demonstration of best constitutional practice, intergovernmental cooperation between the UK Government and the devolved administrations should take place to consider how intra-UK private international law could be reformed learning the lessons from the UK Supreme Court’s highly divided decision in Villiers. Such work should involve the best of the UK’s experts (from each of its systems of law) on private international law from academia, the judiciary and legal practice. Doing so, would avoid accusations that Brexit will see a UK run by generalists who give too little attention and weight to the views of experts. This use of experts should also extend to the UK’s involvement in the future work of HCCH at all levels. The HCCH will only be able to be an effective international organisation if its Members show a commitment to harnessing the talents of experts in the subject within the work of the HCCH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对脱欧后英国国际私法发展的几点思考
自2021年1月1日起,英国已经走出了退出欧盟(EU)的执行期,现在是反思英国在发展国际私法方面的前进道路的合适时机。本文考虑了英国在不久的将来应该采取的实际步骤。通过改善其对海牙国际私法会议(HCCH)缔结的几项关键公约的有效运作的承诺,英国可以做大量工作来推进其对“国际私法规则的逐步统一”的承诺。其中一些步骤可以而且应该立即采取,特别是接受其他国家加入《海牙证据和儿童绑架公约》,并将英国批准《成人公约》的范围扩大到英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰。其他事情需要更多的协商和时间,但有很大的机会通过批准《2019年海牙判决公约》在世界上发挥领导作用,并在实施基于最低限度协调的《公约》时,至少在一定程度上通过实施《英联邦承认和执行民商事判决示范法》在英联邦发挥领导作用。在联合王国内部,作为最佳宪法实践的示范,英国政府和地方分权政府之间的政府间合作应该发生,以考虑如何改革联合王国内部的国际私法,并吸取英国最高法院在维利耶斯一案中高度分歧的判决的教训。这项工作应该包括来自学术界、司法部门和法律实践的英国最优秀的国际私法专家(来自其各个法律体系)。这样做可以避免这样的指责:英国脱欧后,英国将由多面手管理,这些人对专家的观点关注和重视太少。专家的这种使用也应扩大到联合王国参与未来各级的HCCH工作。HCCH只有在其成员承诺在HCCH的工作范围内利用该领域专家的才能时,才能成为一个有效的国际组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The common law marriage in Australian private international law Sustainability and jurisdiction in the international civil litigation market The EU private international law framework for civil disputes concerning credit ratings: Exploring the status quo and prospects of reform The Brussels IIb Regulation – Most significant changes compared to its predecessor and enhancement of the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction When migration meets private international law: issues of private international law in divorce actions of Syrian migrants under temporary protection before the Turkish courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1