The Virtues of Mediation: Milton’s Ludlow Maske

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE REVIEW OF ENGLISH STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1093/res/hgad030
Namratha Rao
{"title":"The Virtues of Mediation: Milton’s Ludlow Maske","authors":"Namratha Rao","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay, partly by way of Milton’s Spenserian engagements, argues that A Maske is neither a celebration of resolve, nor a univocal assertion of exceptional virtue that facilitates some fusion of pleasure and virtue, but is instead a risky exploration of the mediacy of virtue and the virtues of mediation, however much they fail to satisfy. Several kinds of mediation texture A Maske: mediation as the middle ground between disparate things, mediation as intervention in conflict, mediation as the making sensuous of ideas or putting into medium, and, above all, mediation as the material and social process that takes place in and through opposites that both require and condition one another. Consequently, Milton exploits rather than forecloses the dialectical promise of the masque form and leaves open, but not unanswered, the difficult questions of immediacy and transcendence. Drawing on the writings of T. W. Adorno, this essay suggests that mediation—and his related concept, ‘constellation’—afford supple and illuminating ways with which to think through the contradictions of Milton’s poetic-philosophical thought. It offers new interpretations of cruxes in A Maske and shows how each of its characters entails others through a combination of fissures and resemblances. In presenting not an isolated form of virtue, but sketching instead a constellation of interrelated forms, A Maske reveals how—in tending to its mediations—the drear woods of the world might be made to disclose the starry threshold with which we begin and from which we are removed.","PeriodicalId":46496,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF ENGLISH STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF ENGLISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay, partly by way of Milton’s Spenserian engagements, argues that A Maske is neither a celebration of resolve, nor a univocal assertion of exceptional virtue that facilitates some fusion of pleasure and virtue, but is instead a risky exploration of the mediacy of virtue and the virtues of mediation, however much they fail to satisfy. Several kinds of mediation texture A Maske: mediation as the middle ground between disparate things, mediation as intervention in conflict, mediation as the making sensuous of ideas or putting into medium, and, above all, mediation as the material and social process that takes place in and through opposites that both require and condition one another. Consequently, Milton exploits rather than forecloses the dialectical promise of the masque form and leaves open, but not unanswered, the difficult questions of immediacy and transcendence. Drawing on the writings of T. W. Adorno, this essay suggests that mediation—and his related concept, ‘constellation’—afford supple and illuminating ways with which to think through the contradictions of Milton’s poetic-philosophical thought. It offers new interpretations of cruxes in A Maske and shows how each of its characters entails others through a combination of fissures and resemblances. In presenting not an isolated form of virtue, but sketching instead a constellation of interrelated forms, A Maske reveals how—in tending to its mediations—the drear woods of the world might be made to disclose the starry threshold with which we begin and from which we are removed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调解的美德:弥尔顿的勒德洛面具
这篇文章,部分是通过弥尔顿斯宾塞式的参与,认为《面具》既不是对决心的庆祝,也不是对特殊美德的明确主张,这种特殊美德促进了快乐和美德的融合,而是对美德的中介性和调解的美德的冒险探索,不管它们有多不能满足。《面具》的中介性有几种:中介性是不同事物之间的中间地带,中介性是对冲突的介入,中介性是对观念的感官化或媒介化,最重要的是,中介性是物质的和社会的过程,它发生在相互要求和制约的对立面中。因此,弥尔顿利用了,而不是排除了,假面形式的辩证承诺,留下了,但不是没有答案的,直接性和超越性的难题。这篇文章借鉴了阿多诺的著作,提出了冥想——以及他的相关概念,“星座”——提供了灵活而有启发性的方式来思考弥尔顿诗歌哲学思想的矛盾。它为《面具》中的十字架提供了新的解释,并展示了每个角色如何通过裂缝和相似性的组合来吸引其他人。《面具》展现的不是一种孤立的美德形式,而是一群相互关联的形式,它揭示了如何在倾向于它的中介的情况下,使世界的沉闷森林揭示出我们开始和离开的星光门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
期刊最新文献
Daniel Blank. Shakespeare and University Drama in Early Modern England Margreta de Grazia. Shakespeare Without a Life Sarah Green. Sexual Restraint and Aesthetic Experience in Victorian Literary Decadence Ann C Colley. Coleridge and the Geometric Idiom: Walking with Euclid Carl Kears. MS Junius 11 and its Poetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1