In the footsteps of Flora Tristan a political biography

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Modern & Contemporary France Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1080/09639489.2022.2082395
M. Audin
{"title":"In the footsteps of Flora Tristan a political biography","authors":"M. Audin","doi":"10.1080/09639489.2022.2082395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"meeting some of the expectations of life-writing, then, the Ostinato project also witheringly dismantles every assumption of the genre, replacing teleological narrative with a fragmentary yet always rhetorically elaborate idiom (the influence of Gerard Manley Hopkins whose work Des Forêts helped translate in the mid-1980s is here hard to miss). The paradox of Ostinato, then, following on from what Blanchot in 1963 described as the ‘almost [sic] infinite nihilism’ of Le Bavard, is that, while traversed throughout with an uncompromising sense of the limitations, frailties, and shortcomings of language, it nevertheless carries on: Pas à pas, i.e., step by step, negation by negation, as Des Forêts’s posthumous 2001 title would have it, jusqu’au dernier, i.e., till the very last, albeit a very last that forcibly would forever remain inaccessible. If it is true then that the Ostinato project opens onto ‘ineluctable cosmic void’, as Maclachlan convincingly shows, it nevertheless also remains the case, he judiciously adds, that in Des Forêts’s work ‘persistence in responding to the demands of writing is seen as a manifestation of a life force, even if the latter is inescapably bound up with death’s own relentless approach’. ‘Optimists write badly’, Valéry once put it. ‘But pessimists’, Blanchot rejoined, ‘don’t write at all’. In emphasizing the convergence between Des Forêts’s enterprise and the late work of Derrida (though it is perhaps disappointing that the book doesn’t engage with Yves Bonnefoy’s admiring, lengthy, but discordant 1986 reading of Des Forêts’s œuvre), Maclachlan is able to demonstrate the singular excess of language over its own avowed deficiencies, and provide affirmative evidence, not of the possibility of autobiography, but of its far-reaching, never-ending impossibility.","PeriodicalId":44362,"journal":{"name":"Modern & Contemporary France","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern & Contemporary France","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2022.2082395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

meeting some of the expectations of life-writing, then, the Ostinato project also witheringly dismantles every assumption of the genre, replacing teleological narrative with a fragmentary yet always rhetorically elaborate idiom (the influence of Gerard Manley Hopkins whose work Des Forêts helped translate in the mid-1980s is here hard to miss). The paradox of Ostinato, then, following on from what Blanchot in 1963 described as the ‘almost [sic] infinite nihilism’ of Le Bavard, is that, while traversed throughout with an uncompromising sense of the limitations, frailties, and shortcomings of language, it nevertheless carries on: Pas à pas, i.e., step by step, negation by negation, as Des Forêts’s posthumous 2001 title would have it, jusqu’au dernier, i.e., till the very last, albeit a very last that forcibly would forever remain inaccessible. If it is true then that the Ostinato project opens onto ‘ineluctable cosmic void’, as Maclachlan convincingly shows, it nevertheless also remains the case, he judiciously adds, that in Des Forêts’s work ‘persistence in responding to the demands of writing is seen as a manifestation of a life force, even if the latter is inescapably bound up with death’s own relentless approach’. ‘Optimists write badly’, Valéry once put it. ‘But pessimists’, Blanchot rejoined, ‘don’t write at all’. In emphasizing the convergence between Des Forêts’s enterprise and the late work of Derrida (though it is perhaps disappointing that the book doesn’t engage with Yves Bonnefoy’s admiring, lengthy, but discordant 1986 reading of Des Forêts’s œuvre), Maclachlan is able to demonstrate the singular excess of language over its own avowed deficiencies, and provide affirmative evidence, not of the possibility of autobiography, but of its far-reaching, never-ending impossibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟随Flora Tristan的脚步——一本政治传记
在满足生活写作的一些期望的同时,“固定”项目也令人失望地拆除了这一类型的每一个假设,用一个零碎但总是精心修饰的习惯用语取代了目的论叙事(杰拉德·曼利·霍普金斯的影响,他的作品Des Forêts在20世纪80年代中期帮助翻译)。因此,从1963年布朗肖所描述的勒巴伐德的“几乎无限的虚无主义”出发,《固定》的悖论在于,尽管它贯穿始终,对语言的局限性、脆弱性和缺点有着毫不妥协的认识,但它仍在继续:Pas Pas,即一步一步,否定一个又一个的否定,正如Des Forêts在2001年去世后的标题所说的那样,jusqu 'au dernier,即直到最后一刻,尽管这最后一刻将永远无法接近。如果这是真的,那么,正如麦克拉克伦令人信服地表明的那样,“固定的计划”打开了“不可避免的宇宙虚空”,然而,情况仍然如此,他明智地补充说,在Des Forêts的作品中,“坚持响应写作的要求被视为一种生命力的表现,即使后者不可避免地与死亡自己无情的方式联系在一起”。“乐观主义者写得很糟糕”,瓦尔杰里曾经说过。“但是悲观主义者,”布朗肖回答说,“根本就不写。”通过强调Des Forêts的事业与德里达晚期作品之间的融合(尽管这本书没有涉及伊夫·博内福伊(Yves Bonnefoy) 1986年对Des Forêts的œuvre的欣赏,冗长但不和谐的阅读,这可能令人失望),麦克拉克伦能够展示语言的独特过剩,而不是其公开的缺陷,并提供肯定的证据,不是自传的可能性,而是其深远的,永无止境的不可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Cacaphonies: the excremental canon of French literature The deluge: France’s 2024 legislative elections Un-layering Greece: imagined classical heritages in French nationalist travel writing Filiations abortives : l’avortement dans la littérature française de l’extrême contemporain À la recherche de l’homme nouveau – Alberto Savinio et les avant-gardes à Paris 1911–1937
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1