Promoting Social and Emotional Competencies in Elementary School

4区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences Future of Children Pub Date : 2017-03-22 DOI:10.1353/FOC.2017.0003
Stephanie M. Jones, Sophie P. Barnes, Rebecca F. Bailey, E. J. Doolittle
{"title":"Promoting Social and Emotional Competencies in Elementary School","authors":"Stephanie M. Jones, Sophie P. Barnes, Rebecca F. Bailey, E. J. Doolittle","doi":"10.1353/FOC.2017.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary:There's a strong case for making social and emotional learning (SEL) skills and competencies a central feature of elementary school. Children who master SEL skills get along better with others, do better in school, and have more successful careers and better mental and physical health as adults.But evidence from the most rigorous studies of elementary-school SEL programs is ambiguous. Some studies find few or no effects, while others find important and meaningful effects. Or studies find effects for some groups of students but not for others. What causes such variation isn't clear, making it hard to interpret and act on the evidence.What are the sources of variation in the impacts of SEL programs designed for the elementary years? To find out, Stephanie Jones, Sophie Barnes, Rebecca Bailey, and Emily Doolittle examine how the theories of change behind 11 widely used school-based SEL interventions align with the way those interventions measure outcomes. Their central conclusion is that what appears to be variation in impacts may instead stem from imprecise program targets misaligned with too-general measures of outcomes. That is to say, program evaluations often fail to measure whether students have mastered the precise skills the programs seek to impart.The authors make three recommendations for policy makers, practitioners, and researchers. The first is that we should focus more on outcomes at the teacher and classroom level, because teachers' own social-emotional competency and the quality of the classroom environment can have a huge effect on students' SEL. Second, because the elementary years span a great many developmental and environmental transitions, SEL programs should take care to focus on the skills appropriate to each grade and age, rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach. Third, they write, measurement of SEL skills among children in this age range should grow narrower in focus but broader in context and depth.","PeriodicalId":51448,"journal":{"name":"Future of Children","volume":"27 1","pages":"49 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FOC.2017.0003","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Children","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FOC.2017.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

Summary:There's a strong case for making social and emotional learning (SEL) skills and competencies a central feature of elementary school. Children who master SEL skills get along better with others, do better in school, and have more successful careers and better mental and physical health as adults.But evidence from the most rigorous studies of elementary-school SEL programs is ambiguous. Some studies find few or no effects, while others find important and meaningful effects. Or studies find effects for some groups of students but not for others. What causes such variation isn't clear, making it hard to interpret and act on the evidence.What are the sources of variation in the impacts of SEL programs designed for the elementary years? To find out, Stephanie Jones, Sophie Barnes, Rebecca Bailey, and Emily Doolittle examine how the theories of change behind 11 widely used school-based SEL interventions align with the way those interventions measure outcomes. Their central conclusion is that what appears to be variation in impacts may instead stem from imprecise program targets misaligned with too-general measures of outcomes. That is to say, program evaluations often fail to measure whether students have mastered the precise skills the programs seek to impart.The authors make three recommendations for policy makers, practitioners, and researchers. The first is that we should focus more on outcomes at the teacher and classroom level, because teachers' own social-emotional competency and the quality of the classroom environment can have a huge effect on students' SEL. Second, because the elementary years span a great many developmental and environmental transitions, SEL programs should take care to focus on the skills appropriate to each grade and age, rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach. Third, they write, measurement of SEL skills among children in this age range should grow narrower in focus but broader in context and depth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提升小学的社交和情感能力
总结:将社交和情感学习(SEL)技能和能力作为小学教育的核心特征是有充分理由的。掌握SEL技能的孩子与他人相处得更好,在学校表现更好,成年后事业更成功,身心更健康。但是,对小学SEL项目进行的最严格的研究得出的证据并不明确。一些研究发现很少或没有影响,而另一些研究发现了重要和有意义的影响。或者研究发现对某些学生群体有影响,但对其他学生群体没有影响。导致这种差异的原因尚不清楚,因此很难解释并根据证据采取行动。为小学设计的SEL项目影响的差异来源是什么?为了找到答案,Stephanie Jones, Sophie Barnes, Rebecca Bailey和Emily Doolittle研究了11种广泛使用的基于学校的SEL干预措施背后的变化理论是如何与这些干预措施衡量结果的方式相一致的。他们的中心结论是,看似影响的变化,实际上可能源于不精确的项目目标与过于笼统的结果衡量标准不一致。也就是说,课程评估常常无法衡量学生是否掌握了课程试图传授的精确技能。作者对政策制定者、从业者和研究人员提出了三点建议。首先,我们应该更多地关注教师和课堂层面的结果,因为教师自身的社会情感能力和课堂环境的质量会对学生的SEL产生巨大影响。其次,由于小学阶段跨越了许多发展和环境的转变,SEL项目应该注意关注适合每个年级和年龄的技能,而不是采取一种放之四海而皆准的方法。第三,他们写道,在这个年龄段的儿童中,SEL技能的测量应该在重点上缩小,但在背景和深度上扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future of Children
Future of Children Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Future of Children is a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution. The mission of The Future of Children is to translate the best social science research about children and youth into information that is useful to policymakers, practitioners, grant-makers, advocates, the media, and students of public policy. The project publishes two journals and policy briefs each year, and provides various short summaries of our work. Topics range widely -- from income policy to family issues to education and health – with children’s policy as the unifying element. The senior editorial team is diverse, representing two institutions and multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the Issue Introducing the Issue Scaling Early Childhood Evidence-Based Interventions through RPPs Building Capacity for Research and Practice: A Partnership Approach A Unique Opportunity for Education Policy Makers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1