School culture change through the arts: a case study of the turnaround arts program

Q1 Arts and Humanities Arts Education Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1080/10632913.2021.2023059
Ryan D. Shaw, C. Bernard
{"title":"School culture change through the arts: a case study of the turnaround arts program","authors":"Ryan D. Shaw, C. Bernard","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.2023059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, arts education has become a focus of some school improvement efforts, with consistent evidence emerging that vibrant arts programs can improve factors commonly listed as goals in school improvement plans, including engagement, attendance, and school climate. Such models mainly make use of arts integration, an approach that marries content in traditionally tested subjects with artistic processes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the implementation and understanding of an arts-focused school improvement model, the national Turnaround Arts program. Through a multiple case study design, we interviewed stakeholders and analyzed policy documents from the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C. and in two school districts in the United States. Findings suggested that the program was implemented through a flexible framework. Stakeholders understood the program as aligning arts integration strategies with school improvement goals, which ensured program sustainability. Turnaround Arts primarily exists as a collection of strategies and resources for classroom teachers, facilitated by strategic planning, a commitment of resources, and professional development.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"171 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.2023059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, arts education has become a focus of some school improvement efforts, with consistent evidence emerging that vibrant arts programs can improve factors commonly listed as goals in school improvement plans, including engagement, attendance, and school climate. Such models mainly make use of arts integration, an approach that marries content in traditionally tested subjects with artistic processes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the implementation and understanding of an arts-focused school improvement model, the national Turnaround Arts program. Through a multiple case study design, we interviewed stakeholders and analyzed policy documents from the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C. and in two school districts in the United States. Findings suggested that the program was implemented through a flexible framework. Stakeholders understood the program as aligning arts integration strategies with school improvement goals, which ensured program sustainability. Turnaround Arts primarily exists as a collection of strategies and resources for classroom teachers, facilitated by strategic planning, a commitment of resources, and professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过艺术改变学校文化:转型艺术项目的案例研究
近年来,艺术教育已成为一些学校改进工作的焦点,有一致的证据表明,充满活力的艺术课程可以改善学校改进计划中通常列出的目标,包括参与度、出勤率和学校氛围。这种模式主要利用艺术整合,一种将传统测试科目的内容与艺术过程结合起来的方法。本研究的目的是调查一个以艺术为中心的学校改善模式,即国家转型艺术计划的实施和理解。通过多案例研究设计,我们采访了利益相关者,并分析了来自华盛顿特区肯尼迪中心和美国两个学区的政策文件。调查结果表明,该计划是通过灵活的框架实施的。利益相关者将该项目理解为将艺术整合战略与学校改进目标相结合,从而确保项目的可持续性。周转艺术主要是作为课堂教师的策略和资源的集合,通过战略规划、资源承诺和专业发展来促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Recruit, retain, repair: Toward diversity in the North Carolina Music Educators Association The beat goes on? The current presence of music education in Australian public universities Who’s the best? Investigating the NAMM Foundation’s “Best Communities of Music Education” awardees Strengthening music teacher professional development: the P–12 music administrator’s role Arts education in Hong Kong kindergartens: provision of activities and impact of teachers’ demographics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1