Enhancing the quality of neonatal care by improving mothers' knowledge, attitude, and practice through checklist intervention

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Clinical Neonatology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jcn.jcn_20_22
S. Arunakumar, Sujatha Ramabhatta, S. Lakshmipathy, B. Raghunandan, K. Rashmi, Dudala Kumaraswamy, P. Mol, C. Anushree
{"title":"Enhancing the quality of neonatal care by improving mothers' knowledge, attitude, and practice through checklist intervention","authors":"S. Arunakumar, Sujatha Ramabhatta, S. Lakshmipathy, B. Raghunandan, K. Rashmi, Dudala Kumaraswamy, P. Mol, C. Anushree","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_20_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study is to improve the newborn and self-care practices among postnatal mothers through quality improvement techniques and to create awareness about newborn and perinatal care practices in the Mother and Child Protection (MCP) Card. Materials and Methods: The barriers to low newborn and self-care practices were identified and evaluated using fishbone analysis. An operational team was formed, and a checklist was created. A total of four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were carried out. Baseline knowledge was collected using the questionnaire from the checklist. Appropriate education and counseling regarding newborns and self-care practices were taught. A variety of measures were used during counseling. The educated mothers were recalled after 5–7 days to assess their knowledge. Results: A total of 102 postnatal mothers were enrolled in the study, and 78 were available for follow-up after 5–7 days. During all study cycles, median checklist scores increased from 38 to 57 (PDSA 1), 37 to 58 (PDSA 2), 37 to 57 (PDSA 3), and 32.5 to 56 (PDSA 4). The increase in median checklist scores in all the PDSA cycles was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median difference in checklist score from baseline in the chronological order of PDSA cycles was 19, 21.5, 22, and 23. After educating the mothers about the MCP Card, the percentage of mothers who read the information in the MCP Card increased from <5% to 38%. Conclusion: Quality Improvement principles such as the introduction of a checklist can be successfully implemented to improve the quality of newborns and self-care practices among postnatal mothers.","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"154 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_20_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to improve the newborn and self-care practices among postnatal mothers through quality improvement techniques and to create awareness about newborn and perinatal care practices in the Mother and Child Protection (MCP) Card. Materials and Methods: The barriers to low newborn and self-care practices were identified and evaluated using fishbone analysis. An operational team was formed, and a checklist was created. A total of four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were carried out. Baseline knowledge was collected using the questionnaire from the checklist. Appropriate education and counseling regarding newborns and self-care practices were taught. A variety of measures were used during counseling. The educated mothers were recalled after 5–7 days to assess their knowledge. Results: A total of 102 postnatal mothers were enrolled in the study, and 78 were available for follow-up after 5–7 days. During all study cycles, median checklist scores increased from 38 to 57 (PDSA 1), 37 to 58 (PDSA 2), 37 to 57 (PDSA 3), and 32.5 to 56 (PDSA 4). The increase in median checklist scores in all the PDSA cycles was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median difference in checklist score from baseline in the chronological order of PDSA cycles was 19, 21.5, 22, and 23. After educating the mothers about the MCP Card, the percentage of mothers who read the information in the MCP Card increased from <5% to 38%. Conclusion: Quality Improvement principles such as the introduction of a checklist can be successfully implemented to improve the quality of newborns and self-care practices among postnatal mothers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过检查表干预改善母亲的知识、态度和实践,提高新生儿护理质量
目的:本研究的目的是通过质量改进技术改善产后母亲的新生儿和自我护理实践,并在母婴保护(MCP)卡中提高对新生儿和围产期护理实践的认识。材料与方法:采用鱼骨分析法对低新生儿和自我保健实践的障碍进行识别和评价。成立了一个操作团队,并创建了一个检查清单。共进行了四个计划-执行-研究-行动周期。使用检查表中的问卷收集基线知识。教授了有关新生儿和自我保健做法的适当教育和咨询。在咨询过程中使用了多种措施。接受教育的母亲在5-7天后被召回,以评估其知识水平。结果:共有102名产后母亲入组,其中78名在5-7天后可随访。在所有研究周期中,检查表得分中位数从38上升到57 (PDSA 1),从37上升到58 (PDSA 2),从37上升到57 (PDSA 3),从32.5上升到56 (PDSA 4)。在所有PDSA周期中,检查表得分中位数上升有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。按PDSA周期的时间顺序,检查表得分与基线的中位数差异分别为19、21.5、22和23。在对母亲进行MCP卡的教育后,阅读MCP卡上信息的母亲比例从<5%增加到38%。结论:采用检查表等质量改进原则可以有效地提高新生儿质量和产后母亲的自我保健行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Congenital Megalourethra Presented with Renal Anomalies Glomerular Filtration Rate in Sick Neonates: A Focus on Cystatin C Neonatal Enteroviral Meningoencephalitis: Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics of a Nosocomial Outbreak in Colombia Aphallia with Anal Stenosis and Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease: A Rare Case Report The Effect of Plastic Wrap Use to Prevent Hypothermia on Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Extreme Preterm Infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1