Číst či nečíst? Řecký pohled na egyptské hieroglyfy a principy antického umění paměti

Q4 Arts and Humanities Aither Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.5507/aither.2022.005
Diana Míčková
{"title":"Číst či nečíst? Řecký pohled na egyptské hieroglyfy a principy antického umění paměti","authors":"Diana Míčková","doi":"10.5507/aither.2022.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on Greek and Latin interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphs and its similarity and possible relation to the classical art of memory and the (almost lost) methods of Greek mnemonics. The first part points to the differences between the Egyptian and Greek view on script and written sources, based mostly on mythological stories about the origin(s) of writing. The next part briefly explains the ancient interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphs, focusing on Horapollo’s Hieroglyphica and other sources. The third and last part of the study considers a possible relation of that interpretation to the art of memory. The mechanisms of creating images in ars memoriae , of Egyptian hieroglyphs and the Greek interpretation of them are compared and possible a (re)-use of hieroglyphic signs in some form of Greek mnemonics is suggested.","PeriodicalId":36348,"journal":{"name":"Aither","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aither","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2022.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on Greek and Latin interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphs and its similarity and possible relation to the classical art of memory and the (almost lost) methods of Greek mnemonics. The first part points to the differences between the Egyptian and Greek view on script and written sources, based mostly on mythological stories about the origin(s) of writing. The next part briefly explains the ancient interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphs, focusing on Horapollo’s Hieroglyphica and other sources. The third and last part of the study considers a possible relation of that interpretation to the art of memory. The mechanisms of creating images in ars memoriae , of Egyptian hieroglyphs and the Greek interpretation of them are compared and possible a (re)-use of hieroglyphic signs in some form of Greek mnemonics is suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
读还是不读?希腊人对埃及象形文字的看法和古代记忆艺术的原则
本文的重点是希腊语和拉丁语对埃及象形文字的解释,以及它与古典记忆艺术和(几乎丢失的)希腊助记法的相似性和可能的关系。第一部分指出了埃及人和希腊人对文字和文字来源的不同看法,这些观点主要基于关于文字起源的神话故事。下一部分简要地解释了古埃及象形文字的解释,重点是霍阿波罗的象形文字和其他来源。研究的第三部分也是最后一部分考虑了这种解释与记忆艺术的可能关系。比较了埃及象形文字和希腊对它们的解释,并提出了在某种形式的希腊助记符中可能(重新)使用象形文字的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aither
Aither Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Aristotle on Pain: Pain as hindering the energeia in Nicomachean Ethics Epistemological Issues in Puente Hurtado de Mendoza's Early De fide Review: Aiste Celkyte, The Stoic Theory of Beauty Spinoza: The God-Intoxicated "Atheist" Epistemological Issues in Puente Hurtado de Mendoza's Early De fide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1