Vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) score for identification of concussion in cases of non-severe head injury: A systematic review

C. Thomas, Stephen H. Thomas, B. Bloom
{"title":"Vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) score for identification of concussion in cases of non-severe head injury: A systematic review","authors":"C. Thomas, Stephen H. Thomas, B. Bloom","doi":"10.1177/20597002231160941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and importance Each year, 1.4 million patients attend a UK ED with a head injury. Mild traumatic brain injury affects up to 300/100 000 admitted patients/year and a greater number of non-admitted patients. Identifying those patients with a head injury that have concussion, and of those, which will have a prolonged recovery, is critical for discharge planning. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening test (VOMS) has been reported as a useful “sideline tool” to evaluate for sports-related concussion (SRC). VOMS has been assessed for utility primarily for predicting in head-injured, which cases will have concussion, and secondarily in predicting in concussed patients, which will have prolonged recovery. Originally described in 2014, VOMS has not been subject to systematic review or meta-analysis, with regard to its predictive performance for concussion. To assess the state of VOMS evidence for dichotomously classifying concussion status in patients with non-severe head injury Systematic review. Studies comprising the review enrolled ambulatory head-injured adults and children, usually from sports-related settings, in Europe or the USA. VOMS. Presence of concussion, presence of prolonged recovery in concussed patients The review identified 17 studies, characterized by a wide variety of specific approaches to administering and scoring VOMS. While VOMS showed promise as a screening tool for concussion, marked study heterogeneity precluded generation of a pooled effect estimate for VOMS performance. VOMS is potentially useful as a concussion screening tool. Available evidence from the SRC arena suggests sensitivity ranging from 58–96%, with specificity 46−92%. Directions for future VOMS research should include evaluation of standardized administration and scoring, potentially of a simpler VOMS (with fewer components), in a general head-injured population. Further analysis of precisely defined VOMS application may be useful to determine the proper place of VOMS screening for the head-injured.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002231160941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

and importance Each year, 1.4 million patients attend a UK ED with a head injury. Mild traumatic brain injury affects up to 300/100 000 admitted patients/year and a greater number of non-admitted patients. Identifying those patients with a head injury that have concussion, and of those, which will have a prolonged recovery, is critical for discharge planning. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening test (VOMS) has been reported as a useful “sideline tool” to evaluate for sports-related concussion (SRC). VOMS has been assessed for utility primarily for predicting in head-injured, which cases will have concussion, and secondarily in predicting in concussed patients, which will have prolonged recovery. Originally described in 2014, VOMS has not been subject to systematic review or meta-analysis, with regard to its predictive performance for concussion. To assess the state of VOMS evidence for dichotomously classifying concussion status in patients with non-severe head injury Systematic review. Studies comprising the review enrolled ambulatory head-injured adults and children, usually from sports-related settings, in Europe or the USA. VOMS. Presence of concussion, presence of prolonged recovery in concussed patients The review identified 17 studies, characterized by a wide variety of specific approaches to administering and scoring VOMS. While VOMS showed promise as a screening tool for concussion, marked study heterogeneity precluded generation of a pooled effect estimate for VOMS performance. VOMS is potentially useful as a concussion screening tool. Available evidence from the SRC arena suggests sensitivity ranging from 58–96%, with specificity 46−92%. Directions for future VOMS research should include evaluation of standardized administration and scoring, potentially of a simpler VOMS (with fewer components), in a general head-injured population. Further analysis of precisely defined VOMS application may be useful to determine the proper place of VOMS screening for the head-injured.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)评分在非严重头部损伤病例中识别脑震荡:一项系统综述
以及重要性每年有140万名头部受伤的患者参加英国急诊室。轻度创伤性脑损伤每年影响多达300/10万名入院患者和更多未入院患者。识别那些患有脑震荡的头部损伤患者,以及那些将长期康复的患者,对于出院计划至关重要。前庭/眼球运动筛查测试(VOMS)已被报道为评估运动相关脑震荡(SRC)的有用“边线工具”。VOMS主要用于预测哪些病例会出现脑震荡,其次用于预测脑震荡患者的康复时间。VOMS最初描述于2014年,就其对脑震荡的预测性能而言,尚未进行系统综述或荟萃分析。评估VOMS证据的状态,以对非重型颅脑损伤患者的脑震荡状态进行二分分类系统综述。包括该综述的研究纳入了欧洲或美国的头部受伤的成人和儿童,通常来自体育相关环境。脑震荡的存在,脑震荡患者恢复时间延长这篇综述确定了17项研究,其特点是VOMS的管理和评分有多种具体方法。虽然VOMS有望成为脑震荡的筛查工具,但显著的研究异质性阻碍了对VOMS性能的汇总效应估计。VOMS作为脑震荡筛查工具具有潜在的实用性。SRC领域的现有证据表明,敏感性在58%-96%之间,特异性在46-92%之间。未来VOMS研究的方向应包括在一般头部受伤人群中评估标准化管理和评分,可能是更简单的VOMS(成分更少)。对精确定义的VOMS应用的进一步分析可能有助于确定头部损伤的VOMS筛查的适当位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do concussed and non-concussed head trauma individuals have similar symptoms? A retrospective chart review of chronic post-concussive symptomatology Providing a clearer insight into how sport-related concussion and physical pain impact mental health, cognition, and quality of life Parents’/guardians’ experiences with their adolescents’ prolonged recovery from a sport-related concussion A mixed methods investigation into athletic trainer and dietitian's nutrition practices for sport-related concussion patients Using eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1