Are former commercial farmers in Zimbabwe satisfied with the global compensation agreement?

IF 2.1 Q2 URBAN STUDIES Journal of Property Research Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644
Benita Zulch, Joseph Awoamim Yacim, P. Paradza
{"title":"Are former commercial farmers in Zimbabwe satisfied with the global compensation agreement?","authors":"Benita Zulch, Joseph Awoamim Yacim, P. Paradza","doi":"10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Zimbabwe’s new administration indicated its willingness to end the compensation dispute, which lasted for two decades with former commercial farmers (FCFs), by signing the global compensation agreement (GCA). In the agreement, the Government of Zimbabwe (GoZ) offered to pay the sum of 3.5 billion, United States Dollars (USD) to the FCFs for their expropriated farmlands. A study carried out by the Valuation Consortium (Valcon) before the GCA signing revealed that most of the FCFs accepted the compensation offered by the expropriating authority. Thus far, no study has been done to assess the level of satisfaction of the affected FCFs, with the GCA provisions. Therefore, this study evaluated the views of FCFs and members of the Compensation Committee (MsCC) on this subject. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey which was mailed directly to the Chairperson of the FCFs, who sent it to other members to respond to issues raised. The study found mixed views by the FCFs on their levels of satisfaction with the GCA. Thus, the study concluded that compensation offered was not entirely satisfactory because it did not include accruals for delayed payment, professional fees, and a detailed breakdown of the compensable heads of claim.","PeriodicalId":45726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"97 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2021.1965644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Zimbabwe’s new administration indicated its willingness to end the compensation dispute, which lasted for two decades with former commercial farmers (FCFs), by signing the global compensation agreement (GCA). In the agreement, the Government of Zimbabwe (GoZ) offered to pay the sum of 3.5 billion, United States Dollars (USD) to the FCFs for their expropriated farmlands. A study carried out by the Valuation Consortium (Valcon) before the GCA signing revealed that most of the FCFs accepted the compensation offered by the expropriating authority. Thus far, no study has been done to assess the level of satisfaction of the affected FCFs, with the GCA provisions. Therefore, this study evaluated the views of FCFs and members of the Compensation Committee (MsCC) on this subject. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey which was mailed directly to the Chairperson of the FCFs, who sent it to other members to respond to issues raised. The study found mixed views by the FCFs on their levels of satisfaction with the GCA. Thus, the study concluded that compensation offered was not entirely satisfactory because it did not include accruals for delayed payment, professional fees, and a detailed breakdown of the compensable heads of claim.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦的前商业农民对全球补偿协议满意吗?
津巴布韦新政府表示愿意通过签署全球补偿协议(GCA)来结束与前商业农民(ffc)持续了20年的赔偿纠纷。在协议中,津巴布韦政府(GoZ)提出向ffc支付35亿美元,以补偿其被征用的农田。估价联盟(Valcon)在GCA签署之前进行的一项研究显示,大多数ffc接受了征收当局提供的补偿。到目前为止,还没有进行任何研究来评估受影响的FCFs对GCA规定的满意程度。因此,本研究评估了ffs和薪酬委员会(MsCC)成员对这一主题的看法。数据是通过问卷调查收集的,问卷调查直接邮寄给ffc主席,ffc主席将其发送给其他成员,以回应提出的问题。研究发现,fcf对GCA满意度的看法不一。因此,这项研究的结论是,提供的赔偿并不完全令人满意,因为它不包括迟延付款的应计款项、专业费用和可赔偿索赔额的详细分项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Property Research is an international journal. The title reflects the expansion of research, particularly applied research, into property investment and development. The Journal of Property Research publishes papers in any area of real estate investment and development. These may be theoretical, empirical, case studies or critical literature surveys.
期刊最新文献
Digitalisation and valuations: an empirical analysis of valuers’ supplemental skills requirements From agriculture to new town: land conversion towards new-build gentrification in the southwest of Jakarta, Indonesia The impact of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on SA REITs’ performance Do private rental tenants pay for energy efficiency?: The dynamics of green premiums and brown discounts Changes in risk appreciation, and short memory of house buyers when the market is hot, a case study of Christchurch, New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1