The World Turned Upside Down, Again: Hauntings of the English Revolution and Archaeologies of Futures Past in Contemporary British Films

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Journal of British Cinema and Television Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3366/jbctv.2023.0655
M. Schmitt
{"title":"The World Turned Upside Down, Again: Hauntings of the English Revolution and Archaeologies of Futures Past in Contemporary British Films","authors":"M. Schmitt","doi":"10.3366/jbctv.2023.0655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1960s and 1970s, the period of the Civil War and the English Revolution featured prominently in a variety of films ranging from the mainstream historical drama Cromwell to the independent Winstanley and the folk horror film Witchfinder General. Film-makers’ interest in the period at that time coincided with the cultural, social and political turmoil of 1968 as well as with the increasingly popularised revision of the period in Marxist historiography, such as Christopher Hill’s seminal book The World Turned Upside Down. Recently, there has been a renewed interest of British film-makers in Hill’s focus on the subcultures of the English Revolution, such as the Diggers, as well as in the aesthetics of earlier films about the period. This article analyses two contemporary films about the period, Ben Wheatley’s A Field in England and Thomas Clay’s Fanny Lye Deliver’d, and through historicisation and contextualisation within film, genre and media history seeks to understand the significance of their return to the historical material of the seventeenth century as well as to the style of their filmic models from the 1960s and 1970s. The article argues that the two films perform an ‘archaeology of the future’ (Jameson) that excavates utopian ‘futures past’ (Koselleck) in British cultural history as well as in British film and media history. By analysing Wheatley and Clay’s films as hauntological and archaeological texts, the article explores the potential of the cinematic image for engaging with national and film history as well as with visions of the past and the future.","PeriodicalId":43079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British Cinema and Television","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British Cinema and Television","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jbctv.2023.0655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the 1960s and 1970s, the period of the Civil War and the English Revolution featured prominently in a variety of films ranging from the mainstream historical drama Cromwell to the independent Winstanley and the folk horror film Witchfinder General. Film-makers’ interest in the period at that time coincided with the cultural, social and political turmoil of 1968 as well as with the increasingly popularised revision of the period in Marxist historiography, such as Christopher Hill’s seminal book The World Turned Upside Down. Recently, there has been a renewed interest of British film-makers in Hill’s focus on the subcultures of the English Revolution, such as the Diggers, as well as in the aesthetics of earlier films about the period. This article analyses two contemporary films about the period, Ben Wheatley’s A Field in England and Thomas Clay’s Fanny Lye Deliver’d, and through historicisation and contextualisation within film, genre and media history seeks to understand the significance of their return to the historical material of the seventeenth century as well as to the style of their filmic models from the 1960s and 1970s. The article argues that the two films perform an ‘archaeology of the future’ (Jameson) that excavates utopian ‘futures past’ (Koselleck) in British cultural history as well as in British film and media history. By analysing Wheatley and Clay’s films as hauntological and archaeological texts, the article explores the potential of the cinematic image for engaging with national and film history as well as with visions of the past and the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界再次颠倒:英国革命的闹鬼与当代英国电影对未来的考古
在20世纪60年代和70年代,内战和英国革命时期在各种电影中都占有突出地位,从主流历史剧《克伦威尔》到独立的《温斯坦利》和民间恐怖电影《巫师将军》。电影制作人对这一时期的兴趣恰逢1968年的文化、社会和政治动荡,以及马克思主义史学对这一时代的日益普及的修订,如克里斯托弗·希尔的开创性著作《世界颠倒了》。最近,英国电影制作人对希尔关注英国革命的亚文化,如《挖掘者》,以及关于这一时期的早期电影的美学重新产生了兴趣。本文分析了两部关于这一时期的当代电影,本·惠特利的《英格兰的田野》和托马斯·克莱的《范妮·李的交付》,并通过电影中的历史化和语境化,类型和媒体史试图理解他们回归17世纪的历史材料以及20世纪60年代和70年代电影模式的意义。文章认为,这两部电影进行了一场“未来考古”(詹姆逊),挖掘了英国文化史以及英国电影和媒体史上乌托邦式的“未来过去”(科塞莱克)。通过将惠特利和克莱的电影作为闹鬼和考古文本进行分析,本文探讨了电影形象在参与国家和电影历史以及过去和未来愿景方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of British Cinema and Television
Journal of British Cinema and Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Matthew Smith, The Child in British Cinema Melanie Williams, A Taste of Honey Unionist Screws: Depictions of Northern Irish Unionists in British and Irish Cinema Charles Barr, British Cinema: A Very Short Introduction Rapid Evidence Analysis of Diversity in UK Public Service Television: What Do We Know and What Should We Find Out?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1