Measuring cervical range of motion with gyroscope/accelerometer eyeglasses (JINS MEME) in persons with and without neck pain

Saito Kimio, Karina Rosario, Nagao Masato, L. Pascual, Saam Morshed, Miyakoshi Naohisa, Shimada Yoichi
{"title":"Measuring cervical range of motion with gyroscope/accelerometer eyeglasses (JINS MEME) in persons with and without neck pain","authors":"Saito Kimio, Karina Rosario, Nagao Masato, L. Pascual, Saam Morshed, Miyakoshi Naohisa, Shimada Yoichi","doi":"10.4103/JISPRM-000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Neck pain is common in the general population. Active cervical spine range of motion (ACROM) is often measured in the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of neck pain. However, commonly used measurement tools have been deemed inaccurate or impractical. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Instrument, which uses inclinometers and a magnetic reference, has demonstrated high reproducibility and validity in the measurement of ACROM, however, its practicable use is suboptimal due to its large dimensions. The JINS MEME eyeglass is a lightweight and compact wearable device that contains gyroscope and accelerometer electrodes capable of detecting body motion offering an alternative means of measuring ACROM. Aims: The primary aim of this study is to validate ACROM measurements using the JINS MEME eyeglasses in comparison to the CROM Instrument. The secondary aim is to investigate the variable range of motion patterns between individuals with neck pain (NP group) versus asymptomatic individuals (AS group). Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional, clinical measurement, and reliability study. Subjects and Methods: Seven neck pain and 14 asymptomatic individuals underwent ACROM measurements with the JINS MEME and CROM Instrument concurrently. Statistical Analysis Used: Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability of the JINS MEME and CROM Instrument. Mann–Whitney's U-test was used to assess differences between the two groups (NP group vs. AS group) in ACROM. Results: Using the JINS MEME eyeglasses, we observed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for nearly all ACROM directions (cervical spine flexion, extension, and lateral bending) except for rotation which was considered poor. ACROM was decreased in all directions for neck pain patients when measured by both devices. Conclusions: The JINS MEME eyeglasses showed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for all ACROM movements except for cervical rotation. Comparing the AS group and NP group, the ACROM of the NP group was significantly decreased compared to that of the AS group in all cervical spine directions, similar to findings in previous studies. With the exception of the measurement of cervical rotation, the JINS MEME eyeglasses demonstrated similar accuracy to the CROM Instrument in the assessment of ACROM in both the NP and AS groups.","PeriodicalId":75125,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"141 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPRM-000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Neck pain is common in the general population. Active cervical spine range of motion (ACROM) is often measured in the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of neck pain. However, commonly used measurement tools have been deemed inaccurate or impractical. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Instrument, which uses inclinometers and a magnetic reference, has demonstrated high reproducibility and validity in the measurement of ACROM, however, its practicable use is suboptimal due to its large dimensions. The JINS MEME eyeglass is a lightweight and compact wearable device that contains gyroscope and accelerometer electrodes capable of detecting body motion offering an alternative means of measuring ACROM. Aims: The primary aim of this study is to validate ACROM measurements using the JINS MEME eyeglasses in comparison to the CROM Instrument. The secondary aim is to investigate the variable range of motion patterns between individuals with neck pain (NP group) versus asymptomatic individuals (AS group). Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional, clinical measurement, and reliability study. Subjects and Methods: Seven neck pain and 14 asymptomatic individuals underwent ACROM measurements with the JINS MEME and CROM Instrument concurrently. Statistical Analysis Used: Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability of the JINS MEME and CROM Instrument. Mann–Whitney's U-test was used to assess differences between the two groups (NP group vs. AS group) in ACROM. Results: Using the JINS MEME eyeglasses, we observed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for nearly all ACROM directions (cervical spine flexion, extension, and lateral bending) except for rotation which was considered poor. ACROM was decreased in all directions for neck pain patients when measured by both devices. Conclusions: The JINS MEME eyeglasses showed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for all ACROM movements except for cervical rotation. Comparing the AS group and NP group, the ACROM of the NP group was significantly decreased compared to that of the AS group in all cervical spine directions, similar to findings in previous studies. With the exception of the measurement of cervical rotation, the JINS MEME eyeglasses demonstrated similar accuracy to the CROM Instrument in the assessment of ACROM in both the NP and AS groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用陀螺仪/加速度计眼镜(JINS MEME)测量颈部疼痛和非颈部疼痛患者的颈部运动范围
背景:颈部疼痛在普通人群中很常见。活动性颈椎活动范围(ACROM)通常用于颈部疼痛的诊断、评估和治疗。然而,常用的测量工具被认为是不准确或不切实际的。使用倾斜仪和磁性参考的颈椎运动范围(CROM)仪器在ACROM测量中表现出了很高的再现性和有效性,但由于其尺寸较大,其实际应用并不理想。JINS MEME眼镜是一款轻便小巧的可穿戴设备,包含陀螺仪和加速计电极,能够检测身体运动,为测量ACROM提供了一种替代方法。目的:本研究的主要目的是与CROM仪器相比,验证使用JINS MEME眼镜的ACROM测量结果。次要目的是研究颈部疼痛个体(NP组)与无症状个体(AS组)之间的运动模式的可变范围。设置和设计:这是一项横断面、临床测量和可靠性研究。受试者和方法:7名颈部疼痛患者和14名无症状患者同时使用JINS MEME和CROM仪器进行ACROM测量。使用统计分析:使用组内相关系数来确定JINS MEME和CROM仪器的评分者间和评分者内的可靠性。Mann-Whitney的U型检验用于评估两组(NP组与AS组)在ACROM中的差异。结果:使用JINS MEME眼镜,除了旋转被认为较差外,我们观察到几乎所有ACROM方向(颈椎屈曲、伸展和侧向弯曲)的评分者内和评分者间的可靠性都很高。当用两种设备测量时,颈痛患者的ACROM在各个方向上都降低了。结论:除颈椎旋转外,JINS MEME眼镜在所有ACROM运动中均显示出良好的评分者内和评分者间可靠性。与AS组和NP组相比,NP组的ACROM在所有颈椎方向上都显著低于AS组,这与之前的研究结果相似。除了测量颈部旋转外,JINS MEME眼镜在NP组和AS组的ACROM评估中显示出与CROM仪器相似的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical effectiveness of a standardized community-based supervised post-acute rehabilitation model after total knee arthropathy: A pilot study. Special anatomy series. Imaging inner ear structures with high-frequency ultrasound: Application to physical rehabilitation space medicine. Keynote Speakers Oral Presentation 1 and Oral Presentation 2 Specialty Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1