Suffering, Sacred, or Free: Romantic Revolutions of the Word, with Special Reference to Byron

IF 0.4 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM Pub Date : 2021-07-16 DOI:10.1353/srm.2021.0017
J. McGann
{"title":"Suffering, Sacred, or Free: Romantic Revolutions of the Word, with Special Reference to Byron","authors":"J. McGann","doi":"10.1353/srm.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:A few signal commonplaces of Romantic poetry are addressed: first, that the movement executed a “revolution of the word”—or perhaps “revolutions,” given the diversity of Romantic practice; that the shift was announced in Wordsworth’s manifesto, the Lyrical Ballads “Preface,” and most elaborately theorized in Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria; and that while Byron was part of the revolution, he didn’t theorize his practice. But like Blake, because Byron’s work took an explicitly anti-systematic position, his “theory” is regularly presented as an argument by poetic practice: a show and tell performance of a language revolution that, he argued, was notably capacious and free.","PeriodicalId":44848,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/srm.2021.0017","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2021.0017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:A few signal commonplaces of Romantic poetry are addressed: first, that the movement executed a “revolution of the word”—or perhaps “revolutions,” given the diversity of Romantic practice; that the shift was announced in Wordsworth’s manifesto, the Lyrical Ballads “Preface,” and most elaborately theorized in Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria; and that while Byron was part of the revolution, he didn’t theorize his practice. But like Blake, because Byron’s work took an explicitly anti-systematic position, his “theory” is regularly presented as an argument by poetic practice: a show and tell performance of a language revolution that, he argued, was notably capacious and free.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苦难,神圣,还是自由:世界的浪漫主义革命,特别提到拜伦
摘要:论述了浪漫主义诗歌的几个信号共性:首先,鉴于浪漫主义实践的多样性,这场运动执行了一场“文字革命”——或者可能是“革命”;这一转变在华兹华斯的宣言《抒情歌谣“序言”》中得到了宣布,在柯勒律治的《文学传》中也得到了最为详尽的理论阐述;虽然拜伦是革命的一部分,但他并没有将自己的实践理论化。但和布莱克一样,由于拜伦的作品采取了明确的反系统立场,他的“理论”经常被诗歌实践作为一种论点来呈现:他认为,这是一场语言革命的展示和讲述,尤其是广阔和自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Studies in Romanticism was founded in 1961 by David Bonnell Green at a time when it was still possible to wonder whether "romanticism" was a term worth theorizing (as Morse Peckham deliberated in the first essay of the first number). It seemed that it was, and, ever since, SiR (as it is known to abbreviation) has flourished under a fine succession of editors: Edwin Silverman, W. H. Stevenson, Charles Stone III, Michael Cooke, Morton Palet, and (continuously since 1978) David Wagenknecht. There are other fine journals in which scholars of romanticism feel it necessary to appear - and over the years there are a few important scholars of the period who have not been represented there by important work.
期刊最新文献
Serial Forms: The Unfinished Project of Modernity, 1815–1848 by Clare Pettitt (review) Notes on Contributors Text Books for Innocence: Moravian-Swedenborgian Infant Education and William Blake's Songs of Innocence and Experience England Re-Oriented: How Central and South Asian Travelers Imagined the West, 1750–1857 by Humberto Garcia (review) Romantic Sociability, Deaf Comedy, and John Poole's Deaf as a Post (1823)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1