Effect of Peer Support on Health Literacy in Diabetic Patients With Limited Access to Support Resources in Iran: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Education and Community Health Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.34172/jech.2022.6
A. Shahsavari, F. Estebsari, F. Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Mahnaz Ilkhani
{"title":"Effect of Peer Support on Health Literacy in Diabetic Patients With Limited Access to Support Resources in Iran: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"A. Shahsavari, F. Estebsari, F. Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Mahnaz Ilkhani","doi":"10.34172/jech.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health literacy (HL) is one of the factors influencing the use of health-related information by patients with diabetes. As a social support resource, peers can help improve diabetes knowledge in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of peer support on HL in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with low support resources. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 patients with T2D referring to a diabetes clinic in Aligoudarz. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected by the random sampling method and randomly assigned to two groups of intervention and control each containing 40 cases. The data were collected using the Test of Functional Health literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) at the beginning of the study and after 3 months of educational peer support intervention. Eventually, data were analyzed by the statistical tests of chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, t test, and paired t test. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean (±SD) HL between the two groups before the intervention (53.12±13.86 vs. 56.62±10.34, P=0.204). However, the mean HL in the intervention group represented a significant improvement after 3 months of peer intervention compared to the control group (70.27±9.78 vs. 56.87±10.07, P<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, peer support was found to be effective in improving the HL of diabetic patients with limited access to support resources. Therefore, it is recommended to use the capacity of peers as a social support resource in diabetes care programs.","PeriodicalId":36491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jech.2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health literacy (HL) is one of the factors influencing the use of health-related information by patients with diabetes. As a social support resource, peers can help improve diabetes knowledge in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of peer support on HL in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with low support resources. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 patients with T2D referring to a diabetes clinic in Aligoudarz. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected by the random sampling method and randomly assigned to two groups of intervention and control each containing 40 cases. The data were collected using the Test of Functional Health literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) at the beginning of the study and after 3 months of educational peer support intervention. Eventually, data were analyzed by the statistical tests of chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, t test, and paired t test. Results: The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean (±SD) HL between the two groups before the intervention (53.12±13.86 vs. 56.62±10.34, P=0.204). However, the mean HL in the intervention group represented a significant improvement after 3 months of peer intervention compared to the control group (70.27±9.78 vs. 56.87±10.07, P<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, peer support was found to be effective in improving the HL of diabetic patients with limited access to support resources. Therefore, it is recommended to use the capacity of peers as a social support resource in diabetes care programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗支持资源有限的糖尿病患者同伴支持对健康素养的影响:一项随机临床试验
背景:健康素养(HL)是影响糖尿病患者使用健康相关信息的因素之一。作为一种社会支持资源,同伴可以帮助这些患者提高糖尿病知识。本研究的目的是确定同伴支持对支持资源不足的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者HL的影响。方法:在Aligoudarz的一家糖尿病诊所对80名T2D患者进行随机对照试验。采用随机抽样方法选择符合纳入标准的患者,并将其随机分为两组干预组和对照组,每组40例。在研究开始时和经过3个月的教育同伴支持干预后,使用成人功能健康素养测试(TOFHLA)收集数据。最后,通过卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、t检验和配对t检验对数据进行分析。结果:干预前两组的平均(±SD)HL无显著差异(53.12±13.86 vs.56.62±10.34,P=0.004)。然而,与对照组相比,干预组的平均HL在同伴干预3个月后有显著改善(70.27±9.78 vs.56.87±10.07,P<0.001),研究发现,同伴支持在改善获得支持资源有限的糖尿病患者的HL方面是有效的。因此,建议将同龄人的能力作为糖尿病护理项目的社会支持资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education and Community Health
Journal of Education and Community Health Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Social Support Theory as a Predictor of Sleep Hygiene Behaviors Among Older Adults Preventive Behaviors of Iranian Women Toward Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Perspective of Motivation Protection Theory Factors Influencing Substance Use Relapse in People Referring to Addiction Recovery Centers in Jiroft, Kerman Investigating the Effect of Tailored Educational Program Based on Protection Motivation Theory on Mammography Adherence in Iranian Women Subjective Well-Being and Its Relationship With Personality Traits, Irrational Beliefs, and Social Support: A Model Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1