Intertrochanteric fracture fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw: Is tip-apex distance measurement useful for predicting fixation failure?

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Medical Journal Malaysia Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI:10.31436/IMJM.V15I1.404
Goh Kian Liang, Z. Zamzuri, S. MohdAriff, M. Ma
{"title":"Intertrochanteric fracture fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw: Is tip-apex distance measurement useful for predicting fixation failure?","authors":"Goh Kian Liang, Z. Zamzuri, S. MohdAriff, M. Ma","doi":"10.31436/IMJM.V15I1.404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Application of dynamic hip screw (DHS) implant for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures continues to raise concern related to risk of lag screw cut-out with or without subsequent damage to the acetabulum. Measurement of tip-apex distances (TAD) has been recommended to guide the optimal placement of lag screw and to predict subsequent risk of screw cut-out. In this study, the value of TAD was evaluated to verify its usefulness. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 33 consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with DHS. Demographic data of the patients were traced from their case notes. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed by focusing on measurement of TAD on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Radiographs at one year follow-up were reviewed to depict any fixation-related failure or complication. Results: Fifty two percent of patients did not achieved the recommended TAD of ≤ 25mm. The mean post-operative TAD was 25.9mm and elderly patients were likely to achieve TAD of ≤ 25mm. The overall complication rate of 6% was attributed to screw cut-out in two cases. The unstable left-sided fracture was identified to be a potential risk for screw cut-out or migration. Conclusion: TAD is a valuable measurement to guide optimal placement of lag screw during DHS fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.","PeriodicalId":53575,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/IMJM.V15I1.404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Application of dynamic hip screw (DHS) implant for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures continues to raise concern related to risk of lag screw cut-out with or without subsequent damage to the acetabulum. Measurement of tip-apex distances (TAD) has been recommended to guide the optimal placement of lag screw and to predict subsequent risk of screw cut-out. In this study, the value of TAD was evaluated to verify its usefulness. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 33 consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with DHS. Demographic data of the patients were traced from their case notes. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed by focusing on measurement of TAD on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Radiographs at one year follow-up were reviewed to depict any fixation-related failure or complication. Results: Fifty two percent of patients did not achieved the recommended TAD of ≤ 25mm. The mean post-operative TAD was 25.9mm and elderly patients were likely to achieve TAD of ≤ 25mm. The overall complication rate of 6% was attributed to screw cut-out in two cases. The unstable left-sided fracture was identified to be a potential risk for screw cut-out or migration. Conclusion: TAD is a valuable measurement to guide optimal placement of lag screw during DHS fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动力髋螺钉转子间骨折内固定:尖端距离测量对预测内固定失败有用吗?
引言:动力髋螺钉(DHS)植入物在治疗不稳定转子间骨折中的应用继续引起人们对拉力螺钉切除风险的关注,无论是否对髋臼造成损伤。建议测量尖端顶点距离(TAD),以指导拉力螺钉的最佳放置,并预测螺钉切除的后续风险。在本研究中,对TAD的价值进行了评估,以验证其有用性。方法:对33例股骨粗隆间骨折患者采用DHS治疗进行回顾性研究。患者的人口统计数据来源于他们的病例记录。术后X线片通过前后和侧位X线片上TAD的测量进行回顾。回顾一年随访的放射照片,以描述任何与固定相关的失败或并发症。结果:52%的患者未达到建议的TAD≤25mm。术后平均TAD为25.9mm,老年患者可能达到≤25mm的TAD。两例患者的总并发症发生率为6%。不稳定的左侧骨折被认为是螺钉切除或移位的潜在风险。结论:TAD是指导DHS内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折时拉力螺钉最佳位置的一种有价值的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Medical Journal Malaysia
International Medical Journal Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: International Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM) is the official journal of the Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia. It serves primarily as a forum for education and intellectual discourse for health professionals namely in clinical medicine but covers diverse issues relating to medical ethics, professionalism as well as medical developments and research in basic medical sciences. It also serves the unique purpose of highlighting issues and research pertaining to the Muslim world. Contributions to the IMJM reflect its international and multidisciplinary readership and include current thinking across a range of specialties, ethnicities and societies.
期刊最新文献
Sources of Perceived Social Support and Associated Factors for Depression amongst Malay Primary School Adolescents in Kelantan, Malaysia A Multidimensional Strategy: Ways to Combat Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome with Hiatus Hernia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in A Young Adult Female Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Klebsiella Pneumonia Bacteraemia in Adult Confronting Global Obesity Epidemic: Art of Simplicity, Puzzle of Complexity Influence of Creativity Stimulation on Brain Connectivity during Divergent Thinking Tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1