The Perception of Telemedicine as a Consultation Method by Antenatal Women in a Covid 19 Pandemic

Vijaya Sree Medarametla, Garapati Meghana Choudary
{"title":"The Perception of Telemedicine as a Consultation Method by Antenatal Women in a Covid 19 Pandemic","authors":"Vijaya Sree Medarametla, Garapati Meghana Choudary","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i7.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nCovid 19 is a pandemic which created anxiety especially among the antenatal women regarding their health and the fetus in the womb. During the lockdown period this apprehension doubled and we had to use telemedicine as a tool for clearing their queries. We wanted to assess the perception of telemedicine as a consultation method by antenatal women in a covid 19 pandemic. \nMETHODS \nIt was a cross sectional study involving 100 antenatal women conducted in 2019 for over three months. The telephonic consultation was done and counseled them regarding nutrition, covid prevention, warning signs and high risk factors where she has to report to the hospital immediately. Feedback on their perception was obtained by Likert scale and analysed. \nRESULTS \nA majority of antenatal women (92%) opined that telemedicine was useful for clearing their queries. They felt that it should be integrated on regular basis and done continuosly. All 100 women were asked the same questions. Teleconsultation was satisfactory for 84%, for 12% it was just satisfactory: They were from urban area & educated, on the other extreme 4% women were highly satisfied: They were from rural area & illiterate. Irrespective of socioeconomic status we got calls. Patients’ views on telemedicine were - Asset for gaining confidence (72%), Useful for themselves & family members (10%), excellent for clearing apprehension and anxiety (8%), wanted multiple counselling sessions through out pregnancy (6%) and could avoid issues related to high risk pregnancy (4%). On the whole, majority ( 94%) of them expressed that examination part was missing and they were still worried about baby. \nCONCLUSIONS \nThough the traditional approach was missing, telemedicine was good for antenatal women on the whole for better communication with the doctors in the lockdown period due to covid 19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i7.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Covid 19 is a pandemic which created anxiety especially among the antenatal women regarding their health and the fetus in the womb. During the lockdown period this apprehension doubled and we had to use telemedicine as a tool for clearing their queries. We wanted to assess the perception of telemedicine as a consultation method by antenatal women in a covid 19 pandemic. METHODS It was a cross sectional study involving 100 antenatal women conducted in 2019 for over three months. The telephonic consultation was done and counseled them regarding nutrition, covid prevention, warning signs and high risk factors where she has to report to the hospital immediately. Feedback on their perception was obtained by Likert scale and analysed. RESULTS A majority of antenatal women (92%) opined that telemedicine was useful for clearing their queries. They felt that it should be integrated on regular basis and done continuosly. All 100 women were asked the same questions. Teleconsultation was satisfactory for 84%, for 12% it was just satisfactory: They were from urban area & educated, on the other extreme 4% women were highly satisfied: They were from rural area & illiterate. Irrespective of socioeconomic status we got calls. Patients’ views on telemedicine were - Asset for gaining confidence (72%), Useful for themselves & family members (10%), excellent for clearing apprehension and anxiety (8%), wanted multiple counselling sessions through out pregnancy (6%) and could avoid issues related to high risk pregnancy (4%). On the whole, majority ( 94%) of them expressed that examination part was missing and they were still worried about baby. CONCLUSIONS Though the traditional approach was missing, telemedicine was good for antenatal women on the whole for better communication with the doctors in the lockdown period due to covid 19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎19大流行中产前妇女对远程医疗作为咨询方法的认识
背景新冠肺炎19是一种流行病,它引起了产前妇女对自己的健康和子宫内胎儿的焦虑。在封锁期间,这种担忧增加了一倍,我们不得不使用远程医疗作为清除他们查询的工具。我们想评估新冠肺炎19大流行中产前妇女对远程医疗作为咨询方法的看法。方法这是一项涉及100名产前妇女的横断面研究,于2019年进行,为期三个多月。电话咨询已经完成,并就营养、新冠肺炎预防、警告信号和高危因素向他们提供咨询,她必须立即向医院报告。通过Likert量表获得对他们感知的反馈并进行分析。结果大多数产前妇女(92%)认为远程医疗有助于澄清她们的疑问。他们认为,应该定期加以整合,并持续不断地进行。所有100名女性都被问到了同样的问题。84%的人对远程咨询感到满意,12%的人只是满意:他们来自城市地区,受过教育,另一方面,4%的女性非常满意:她们来自农村地区,不识字。不管社会经济地位如何,我们都会接到电话。患者对远程医疗的看法是——有助于获得信心(72%),对自己和家人有用(10%),非常有助于消除恐惧和焦虑(8%),希望在怀孕期间进行多次咨询(6%),并可以避免与高危妊娠相关的问题(4%)。总的来说,大多数(94%)的人表示检查部位不见了,他们仍然担心孩子。结论尽管传统方法缺失,但在新冠肺炎19大流行导致的封锁期间,远程医疗总体上有利于产前妇女与医生更好地沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1