Firm productivity, heterogeneity and macroeconomic dynamics: a data-driven investigation

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Baltic Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/1406099X.2019.1633897
Mihnea Constantinescu, Aurelija Proškutė
{"title":"Firm productivity, heterogeneity and macroeconomic dynamics: a data-driven investigation","authors":"Mihnea Constantinescu, Aurelija Proškutė","doi":"10.1080/1406099X.2019.1633897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we offer a unique firm-level view of the empirical regularities underlying the evolution of the Lithuanian economy over the period of 2000–2014. Employing a novel dataset, we investigate key distributional moments of real and financial variables of Lithuanian firms. We focus in particular on the issues related to productivity, firm birth and death and the associated employment creation and destruction across firm sizes, industry classification and trade status (exporting vs. non-exporting). We refrain from any structural modelling attempt in order to map out the key economic processes across industries and selected firm characteristics. Nevertheless, existing theoretical and empirical findings guide our analysis and the selection of the main variables to investigate. We uncover similar regularities as already highlighted in the literature: trade participation and firm productivity are strongly positively linked, the 2008 recession has had a cleansing effect on the non-tradable sector, firm birth (death) is highly pro(counter)-cyclical. The richness of the dataset allows us to produce additional insights: for example, we observe an increasing share of exporting but a constant share of importing firms since 2000.","PeriodicalId":43756,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economics","volume":"19 1","pages":"216 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1406099X.2019.1633897","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2019.1633897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we offer a unique firm-level view of the empirical regularities underlying the evolution of the Lithuanian economy over the period of 2000–2014. Employing a novel dataset, we investigate key distributional moments of real and financial variables of Lithuanian firms. We focus in particular on the issues related to productivity, firm birth and death and the associated employment creation and destruction across firm sizes, industry classification and trade status (exporting vs. non-exporting). We refrain from any structural modelling attempt in order to map out the key economic processes across industries and selected firm characteristics. Nevertheless, existing theoretical and empirical findings guide our analysis and the selection of the main variables to investigate. We uncover similar regularities as already highlighted in the literature: trade participation and firm productivity are strongly positively linked, the 2008 recession has had a cleansing effect on the non-tradable sector, firm birth (death) is highly pro(counter)-cyclical. The richness of the dataset allows us to produce additional insights: for example, we observe an increasing share of exporting but a constant share of importing firms since 2000.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业生产率、异质性和宏观经济动态:一项数据驱动的调查
在本文中,我们提供了一个独特的企业层面的观点,在2000年至2014年期间立陶宛经济演变的经验规律。采用新颖的数据集,我们调查了立陶宛公司的真实和金融变量的关键分布时刻。我们特别关注与生产率、企业的诞生和死亡以及企业规模、行业分类和贸易状况(出口与非出口)相关的就业创造和破坏有关的问题。为了绘制出跨行业的关键经济过程和选定的企业特征,我们避免了任何结构建模的尝试。然而,现有的理论和实证研究结果指导我们的分析和选择的主要变量进行调查。我们发现了文献中已经强调的类似规律:贸易参与和企业生产率之间存在强烈的正相关关系,2008年的衰退对非贸易部门产生了清洁效应,企业的诞生(死亡)具有高度的顺(反)周期。数据集的丰富性使我们能够产生额外的见解:例如,我们观察到自2000年以来出口公司的份额不断增加,但进口公司的份额保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Economic upgrading of Central and Eastern European economies through global value chain participation and foreign direct investment Are Poles stuck in overeducation? Individual dynamics of educational mismatch in Poland Choosing the European fiscal rule A long-run perspective on Latvian regional gross domestic product inequality, 1925–2016 The communication reaction function of the European Central Bank. An analysis using topic modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1