Modelling of Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of Water-Based Nanofluids using Machine-Learning Techniques

Sai Ganga, Z. Uddin, R. Asthana, H. Hassan, Arpit Bhardwaj
{"title":"Modelling of Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of Water-Based Nanofluids using Machine-Learning Techniques","authors":"Sai Ganga, Z. Uddin, R. Asthana, H. Hassan, Arpit Bhardwaj","doi":"10.33889/ijmems.2023.8.5.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a variety of machine-learning algorithms are used to predict the viscosity and thermal conductivity of several water-based nanofluids. Machine learning algorithms, namely decision tree, random forest, extra tree, KNN, and polynomial regression, have been used, and their performances have been compared. The input parameters for the prediction of the thermal conductivity of nanofluids include temperature, concentration, and the thermal conductivity of nanoparticles. A three-input and a two-input model were utilized in modelling the viscosity of nanofluid. Both models considered temperature and concentration as input parameters, and additionally, the type of nanoparticle was considered for the three-input model. The order of importance of the most influential parameters in predicting both viscosity and thermal conductivity was studied. A wider range of input parameters have been considered in an open-access database. With the existing experimental data, all of the developed machine learning models exhibit reasonable agreement. Extra trees were found to provide the best results for estimating thermal conductivity, with a value of 0.9403. In predicting viscosity using a three-input model, extra trees were found to provide the best result with a value of 0.9771, and decision trees were found to provide the best results for estimating the viscosity using a two-input model with a value of 0.9678. In order to study heat transport phenomena through mathematical modelling, it is important to have an explicit mathematical expression. Therefore, the formulation of mathematical expressions for predicting viscosity and thermal conductivity has been carried out. Additionally, a comparison with the Xue and Maxwell thermal conductivity models is made to validate the results of this study, and the results are observed to be reliable.","PeriodicalId":44185,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2023.8.5.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a variety of machine-learning algorithms are used to predict the viscosity and thermal conductivity of several water-based nanofluids. Machine learning algorithms, namely decision tree, random forest, extra tree, KNN, and polynomial regression, have been used, and their performances have been compared. The input parameters for the prediction of the thermal conductivity of nanofluids include temperature, concentration, and the thermal conductivity of nanoparticles. A three-input and a two-input model were utilized in modelling the viscosity of nanofluid. Both models considered temperature and concentration as input parameters, and additionally, the type of nanoparticle was considered for the three-input model. The order of importance of the most influential parameters in predicting both viscosity and thermal conductivity was studied. A wider range of input parameters have been considered in an open-access database. With the existing experimental data, all of the developed machine learning models exhibit reasonable agreement. Extra trees were found to provide the best results for estimating thermal conductivity, with a value of 0.9403. In predicting viscosity using a three-input model, extra trees were found to provide the best result with a value of 0.9771, and decision trees were found to provide the best results for estimating the viscosity using a two-input model with a value of 0.9678. In order to study heat transport phenomena through mathematical modelling, it is important to have an explicit mathematical expression. Therefore, the formulation of mathematical expressions for predicting viscosity and thermal conductivity has been carried out. Additionally, a comparison with the Xue and Maxwell thermal conductivity models is made to validate the results of this study, and the results are observed to be reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习技术的水基纳米流体粘度和导热性建模
在这项研究中,使用了多种机器学习算法来预测几种水基纳米流体的粘度和导热性。使用了机器学习算法,即决策树、随机森林、额外树、KNN和多项式回归,并比较了它们的性能。用于预测纳米流体热导率的输入参数包括温度、浓度和纳米颗粒的热导率。采用三输入和两输入模型对纳米流体的黏度进行建模。两种模型都考虑了温度和浓度作为输入参数,此外,三输入模型还考虑了纳米颗粒的类型。研究了影响粘度和导热系数预测的各参数的重要程度。在开放获取的数据库中考虑了更大范围的输入参数。与现有的实验数据相比,所开发的机器学习模型都表现出合理的一致性。发现额外的树可以提供最佳的热导率估算结果,其值为0.9403。使用三输入模型预测粘度时,发现额外树提供最佳结果,其值为0.9771;使用两输入模型估计粘度时,发现决策树提供最佳结果,其值为0.9678。为了通过数学建模来研究热传递现象,重要的是要有一个明确的数学表达式。因此,推导出预测黏度和导热系数的数学表达式。并与Xue和Maxwell导热模型进行了对比,验证了本研究的结果,结果是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
57
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: IJMEMS is a peer reviewed international journal aiming on both the theoretical and practical aspects of mathematical, engineering and management sciences. The original, not-previously published, research manuscripts on topics such as the following (but not limited to) will be considered for publication: *Mathematical Sciences- applied mathematics and allied fields, operations research, mathematical statistics. *Engineering Sciences- computer science engineering, mechanical engineering, information technology engineering, civil engineering, aeronautical engineering, industrial engineering, systems engineering, reliability engineering, production engineering. *Management Sciences- engineering management, risk management, business models, supply chain management.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the Decisional Leadership Role Reliability Analysis of the Functional Capabilities of an Autonomous Vehicle Modeling Developable Surfaces using Quintic Bézier and Hermite Curves Deep Learning based Model for Detection of Vitiligo Skin Disease using Pre-trained Inception V3 A Comparative Study using Scale-2 and Scale-3 Haar Wavelet for the Solution of Higher Order Differential Equation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1