Staying in Touch with Affect: Maintaining Vital Access to the Body while Working Online

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2023.2204537
M. Bayles
{"title":"Staying in Touch with Affect: Maintaining Vital Access to the Body while Working Online","authors":"M. Bayles","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2023.2204537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presented here is a verbatim session conducted online. The session integrates the ideas of Aline LaPierre’s therapeutic touch model into psychoanalytic practice. Allan Schore introduced LaPierre’s work in Psychologist/Psychoanalyst in 2003, arguing that, “it is time to reappraise the central role of the operations of the bodily self in psychopathogenisis and treatment” (p. 9). More specifically, he wrote, “Whatever the nature of the clinical issues, there is now solid evidence for the critical role of touch in human psychology and biology” (p. 9). This article presents a somatically informed, right hemispheric way of relating that enlivens and deepens the clinical process. Importantly, it presents a perspective that responds to Russell’s (2015) unease about the loss of functional equivalence as we move our face-to-face sessions online. In particular, with its focus on engaging affect at the somatic level, it addresses Russell’s concern about the loss of the fast paced, body-to body implicit processes, which she argues results in the loss of “the kind of holding environment that supports the in-dwelling of the psyche in the soma” (Bayles, 2016, p. 654).","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"58 1","pages":"522 - 544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2023.2204537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presented here is a verbatim session conducted online. The session integrates the ideas of Aline LaPierre’s therapeutic touch model into psychoanalytic practice. Allan Schore introduced LaPierre’s work in Psychologist/Psychoanalyst in 2003, arguing that, “it is time to reappraise the central role of the operations of the bodily self in psychopathogenisis and treatment” (p. 9). More specifically, he wrote, “Whatever the nature of the clinical issues, there is now solid evidence for the critical role of touch in human psychology and biology” (p. 9). This article presents a somatically informed, right hemispheric way of relating that enlivens and deepens the clinical process. Importantly, it presents a perspective that responds to Russell’s (2015) unease about the loss of functional equivalence as we move our face-to-face sessions online. In particular, with its focus on engaging affect at the somatic level, it addresses Russell’s concern about the loss of the fast paced, body-to body implicit processes, which she argues results in the loss of “the kind of holding environment that supports the in-dwelling of the psyche in the soma” (Bayles, 2016, p. 654).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与情感保持联系:在线工作时保持与身体的重要联系
这里呈现的是在线进行的逐字记录。本课程将把Aline LaPierre的治疗性触摸模型整合到精神分析实践中。2003年,Allan Schore在《心理学家/精神分析学家》一书中介绍了LaPierre的工作,他认为,“是时候重新评估身体自我在精神发病和治疗中的核心作用了”(第9页)。更具体地说,他写道,“无论临床问题的性质如何,现在都有确凿的证据证明触摸在人类心理学和生物学中的关键作用”(第9页)。激活和深化临床过程的右半球联系方式。重要的是,它提出了一个观点,回应了罗素(2015)的担忧,即随着我们将面对面的会议转移到网上,功能对等的丧失。特别是,由于它关注躯体层面的参与影响,它解决了罗素对失去快节奏的、身体对身体的内隐过程的担忧,她认为这会导致失去“那种支持灵魂在躯体中居住的保持环境”(Bayles, 2016, p. 654)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Slipping Glimpser We Don’t Trust You Reflections on anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis Review of Transference, Love, Being: Essential Essays from the Field Review of Opera on the Couch An Intergenerational Look at Abortion, the 1970s vs Now: Reflections on Papers by Isheh Beck and Naomi Snider
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1