How Will You Feel on Valentine's Day? Affective Forecasting and Recall Biases as a Function of Anxiety, Depression, and Borderline Personality Disorder Features.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1521/jscp.2022.41.5.491
Christopher D Hughes, Alexandra M King, Katharine Bailey, Maria C Alba, Elizabeth Hoelscher, Shireen L Rizvi
{"title":"How Will You Feel on Valentine's Day? Affective Forecasting and Recall Biases as a Function of Anxiety, Depression, and Borderline Personality Disorder Features.","authors":"Christopher D Hughes, Alexandra M King, Katharine Bailey, Maria C Alba, Elizabeth Hoelscher, Shireen L Rizvi","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2022.41.5.491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prediction of affective experiences, also known as affective forecasting, is an integral component of individuals' decision-making processes. Yet, research consistently demonstrates that affective forecasts (AF) and recollections (AR) are generally inaccurate. Recent research has demonstrated distinct patterns of AF/R bias related to psychopathology. The present study examined the relationship between AF/R and features of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), anxiety, and depression using Valentine's Day as the target event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Undergraduate students (N=263; 33% white; 63% female; <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub>=19.08) predicted their affective states a week before, and then reported their actual affective states on Valentine's Day and the two days after, and recalled Valentine's Day affect two days later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that higher BPD symptomatology predicted a significant overestimation of negative affect (<i>B</i>=.17, <i>p</i>=.02), even after controlling for anxiety and depression. Additionally, individuals' levels of depressive, anxious, and BPD symptomatology were significant predictors of AF of positive affect when entered into regression analyses separately, however when entered together, only depressive symptoms remained significant. Specifically, higher depressive symptoms predicted a significant underestimation of positive affect (<i>B</i>=-.21, <i>p</i>=.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results were in line with prior research indicating that unique patterns of AF biases are associated with symptoms of psychopathology. However, results failed to support prior research linking AR biases to symptoms of psychopathology. Implications for future studies of affective biases and psychopathology more generally are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"491-516"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2022.41.5.491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prediction of affective experiences, also known as affective forecasting, is an integral component of individuals' decision-making processes. Yet, research consistently demonstrates that affective forecasts (AF) and recollections (AR) are generally inaccurate. Recent research has demonstrated distinct patterns of AF/R bias related to psychopathology. The present study examined the relationship between AF/R and features of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), anxiety, and depression using Valentine's Day as the target event.

Methods: Undergraduate students (N=263; 33% white; 63% female; Mage=19.08) predicted their affective states a week before, and then reported their actual affective states on Valentine's Day and the two days after, and recalled Valentine's Day affect two days later.

Results: Results indicate that higher BPD symptomatology predicted a significant overestimation of negative affect (B=.17, p=.02), even after controlling for anxiety and depression. Additionally, individuals' levels of depressive, anxious, and BPD symptomatology were significant predictors of AF of positive affect when entered into regression analyses separately, however when entered together, only depressive symptoms remained significant. Specifically, higher depressive symptoms predicted a significant underestimation of positive affect (B=-.21, p=.01).

Discussion: Results were in line with prior research indicating that unique patterns of AF biases are associated with symptoms of psychopathology. However, results failed to support prior research linking AR biases to symptoms of psychopathology. Implications for future studies of affective biases and psychopathology more generally are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情人节你会有什么感觉?情感预测和回忆偏差与焦虑、抑郁和边缘型人格障碍特征的关系
引言:情感体验的预测,也称为情感预测,是个人决策过程中不可或缺的组成部分。然而,研究一致表明,情感预测(AF)和回忆(AR)通常是不准确的。最近的研究已经证明了与精神病理学相关的房颤/房颤偏倚的不同模式。本研究以情人节为目标事件,研究了AF/R与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、焦虑和抑郁特征之间的关系。方法:大学生(N=263;33%为白人;63%为女性;Mage=19.08)在一周前预测自己的情感状态,然后在情人节和情人节后两天报告自己的实际情感状态,并在两天后回忆情人节情感。结果:结果表明,即使在控制了焦虑和抑郁之后,较高的BPD症状也预示着对负面影响的显著高估(B=.17,p=.02)。此外,当单独进入回归分析时,个体的抑郁、焦虑和BPD症状水平是积极影响AF的重要预测因素,但当一起进入时,只有抑郁症状仍然显著。具体而言,较高的抑郁症状预示着对积极情感的严重低估(B=−.21,p=.01)。讨论:结果与先前的研究一致,表明AF偏见的独特模式与精神病理学症状有关。然而,研究结果未能支持先前将AR偏见与精神病理学症状联系起来的研究。讨论了对情感偏见和精神病理学未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Mapping and Rewiring Biology via Proximity Induction Synthesis, Structure, and Function of Heparan Sulfate Glycopolymers to Investigate Glycosaminoglycan-Protein Interactions. Designing Fullerene-Based Nanomedicines for Treating Inflammatory Diseases: From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1