Lines Left to Cross: Deglobalization and the Domestic Western in Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Critical Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1086/724983
Joseph Jonghyun Jeon
{"title":"Lines Left to Cross: Deglobalization and the Domestic Western in Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite","authors":"Joseph Jonghyun Jeon","doi":"10.1086/724983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article situates Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite (2019) within the historical logics of the Washington Consensus. In this broad context, we might think of the film’s much-heralded class critique as not quite so domestically contained as may initially appear in a film staged primarily in the confines of a single household. Instead, it opens onto a global political economic framework, which it explores through a nested structure in which class dynamics are also mobilized to explore cold-war and trade-war logics, both of which are revealed to be radically interconnected with domestic concerns. Parasite reveals then the inherent dissensus in the Washington Consensus, a dissensus that was always latent but eventually became more explicit. We might say more generally that stories of class difference take on a pointedly different tenor during periods of stagnation; the specific anxiety in Parasite then is not just over the moral fact of social inequality but also specifically about the material distribution of wealth in the face of diminishing resources. The fact of brutal competition emerges from a milieu that seems ostensibly defined by plentitude.","PeriodicalId":48130,"journal":{"name":"Critical Inquiry","volume":"49 1","pages":"557 - 580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article situates Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite (2019) within the historical logics of the Washington Consensus. In this broad context, we might think of the film’s much-heralded class critique as not quite so domestically contained as may initially appear in a film staged primarily in the confines of a single household. Instead, it opens onto a global political economic framework, which it explores through a nested structure in which class dynamics are also mobilized to explore cold-war and trade-war logics, both of which are revealed to be radically interconnected with domestic concerns. Parasite reveals then the inherent dissensus in the Washington Consensus, a dissensus that was always latent but eventually became more explicit. We might say more generally that stories of class difference take on a pointedly different tenor during periods of stagnation; the specific anxiety in Parasite then is not just over the moral fact of social inequality but also specifically about the material distribution of wealth in the face of diminishing resources. The fact of brutal competition emerges from a milieu that seems ostensibly defined by plentitude.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有待跨越的界线:奉俊昊《寄生虫》中的去全球化与西方本土
本文将奉俊昊的《寄生虫》(2019)置于华盛顿共识的历史逻辑之中。在这种广泛的背景下,我们可能会认为这部电影广受欢迎的阶级批判并不像最初出现在一部主要在一个家庭范围内上演的电影中那样在国内受到控制。相反,它打开了一个全球政治经济框架,通过一个嵌套的结构来探索这个框架,在这个结构中,阶级动态也被动员起来探索冷战和贸易战逻辑,这两种逻辑都与国内问题有着根本的联系。《寄生虫》揭示了华盛顿共识中固有的分歧,这种分歧总是潜伏的,但最终变得更加明显。我们可以更普遍地说,阶级差异的故事在停滞时期呈现出明显不同的基调;《寄生虫》中的具体焦虑不仅是社会不平等的道德事实,还特别是在资源不断减少的情况下财富的物质分配。残酷竞争的事实出现在一个表面上似乎由丰富定义的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Inquiry
Critical Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Critical Inquiry has published the best critical thought in the arts and humanities since 1974. Combining a commitment to rigorous scholarship with a vital concern for dialogue and debate, the journal presents articles by eminent critics, scholars, and artists on a wide variety of issues central to contemporary criticism and culture. In CI new ideas and reconsideration of those traditional in criticism and culture are granted a voice. The wide interdisciplinary focus creates surprising juxtapositions and linkages of concepts, offering new grounds for theoretical debate. In CI, authors entertain and challenge while illuminating such issues as improvisations, the life of things, Flaubert, and early modern women"s writing.
期刊最新文献
Victorian Equations :Bread and Freedom: Egypt’s Revolutionary Situation The Draw of the Mark A Peripheral Vision: Framing the Cultural Bias in the Center of Photography :Apropos of Something: A History of Irrelevance and Relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1