Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants between Born at 34+0 to 34+6 Weeks and at 35+0 to 36+6 Weeks of Gestation

Hyung-Joon Joo, G. Shim, M. Chey
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants between Born at 34+0 to 34+6 Weeks and at 35+0 to 36+6 Weeks of Gestation","authors":"Hyung-Joon Joo, G. Shim, M. Chey","doi":"10.5385/nm.2020.27.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We compared perinatal characteristics, clinical outcomes, and treatment between late preterm infants born at 34 weeks and 35 to 36 weeks of gestation. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 254 neonates (gestational age 34 to 36 weeks) who were born at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital between July 1, 2013 and June 31, 2018. Late preterm infants were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (born at 34 weeks, n=88) and Group 2 (born at 35 to 36 weeks, n=162). We compared the clinical outcomes, treatment, and readmission within 12 months after birth between two groups. Results: Group 1 showed higher frequencies of antenatal steroid administration, prema­ ture membrane rupture, maternal antibiotic use, and histologic chorioamnionitis. Group 1 also had significantly more medical problems such as respiratory distress, feed ing intolerance, gavage feeding, neonatal jaundice, apnea or bradycardia, and hypocalcemia. Treatment during hospital stay including respiratory support, nutritional sup port, and antibiotics use over 24 hours was also significantly higher in Group 1. In addition, delayed discharge was more frequent in Group 1. Conclusion: Late preterm infants born at 34 weeks gestation had significantly higher morbidity, required more aggressive management, and more often had delayed dis­ charge compared to those in late preterm infants born at 35 to 36 weeks’ gestation.","PeriodicalId":32945,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2020.27.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We compared perinatal characteristics, clinical outcomes, and treatment between late preterm infants born at 34 weeks and 35 to 36 weeks of gestation. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 254 neonates (gestational age 34 to 36 weeks) who were born at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital between July 1, 2013 and June 31, 2018. Late preterm infants were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (born at 34 weeks, n=88) and Group 2 (born at 35 to 36 weeks, n=162). We compared the clinical outcomes, treatment, and readmission within 12 months after birth between two groups. Results: Group 1 showed higher frequencies of antenatal steroid administration, prema­ ture membrane rupture, maternal antibiotic use, and histologic chorioamnionitis. Group 1 also had significantly more medical problems such as respiratory distress, feed ing intolerance, gavage feeding, neonatal jaundice, apnea or bradycardia, and hypocalcemia. Treatment during hospital stay including respiratory support, nutritional sup port, and antibiotics use over 24 hours was also significantly higher in Group 1. In addition, delayed discharge was more frequent in Group 1. Conclusion: Late preterm infants born at 34 weeks gestation had significantly higher morbidity, required more aggressive management, and more often had delayed dis­ charge compared to those in late preterm infants born at 35 to 36 weeks’ gestation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠34+0 ~ 34+6周和35+0 ~ 36+6周出生的晚期早产儿临床结局的比较
目的:我们比较了妊娠34周和35至36周出生的晚期早产儿的围产期特征、临床结果和治疗。方法:我们回顾了2013年7月1日至2018年6月31日期间在仁杰大学桑吉白医院出生的254名新生儿(胎龄34至36周)的医疗记录。晚期早产儿分为两组:第1组(出生34周,n=88)和第2组(出生35-36周,n=162)。我们比较了两组患者在出生后12个月内的临床结果、治疗和再次入院情况。结果:第1组显示,产前使用类固醇、胎膜破裂、母体使用抗生素和组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎的频率较高。第1组也有明显更多的医疗问题,如呼吸窘迫、进食不耐受、灌胃喂养、新生儿黄疸、呼吸暂停或心动过缓以及低钙血症。住院期间的治疗,包括呼吸支持、营养支持和24小时以上的抗生素使用,在第1组中也显著增加。此外,延迟出院在第1组中更为常见。结论:与妊娠35至36周出生的晚期早产儿相比,妊娠34周出生的后期早产儿的发病率明显更高,需要更积极的管理,并且更经常出现延迟出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Full-Term Baby with Cerebellar Hemorrhage Referred for Severe Jaundice Occurring within the First 3 Days of Life Should We Consider UGT1A1 Mutation Analysis in Evaluating the Prolonged Jaundice of Newborn Infants? A Case of Oropharyngeal Teratoma Associated with Subluxation of Temporomandibular Joint: A Case Report Does Neonatal Microbiome Research Encompass the Placental Transfer Pathway? Beta Thalassemia Presenting with Neonatal Cholestasis and Extensive Hemosiderosis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1