Challenges of Written Response to Student Writing: Praise, Over-Commenting and Appropriation

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS AAA-ARBEITEN AUS ANGLISTIK UND AMERIKANISTIK Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.24053/aaa-2022-0006
Cvetka Sokolov
{"title":"Challenges of Written Response to Student Writing: Praise, Over-Commenting and Appropriation","authors":"Cvetka Sokolov","doi":"10.24053/aaa-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ marginal and end comments are an essential part of teaching and evaluating students’ written work. However, the method can backfire when teachers resort to insincere formulaic praise, fall into the trap of over-commenting, and lose sight of the actual author of the text, appropriating it in the process. The challenges of providing effective written feedback require an examination of students’ attitudes toward it, both to reassure teachers that they are doing better than they think they are, but also to make them aware that there is much room for improvement. For one thing, the remaining weaknesses can be addressed in systematic teacher training on written feedback, which has been lacking. Second, these same teachers should then teach their students how to interpret marginal and final comments and use them to revise their work. The article reviews the research to date in this area and presents a case study that sheds more light on the topic, making it clear that more systematic and holistic research and training would be needed in this area.","PeriodicalId":41564,"journal":{"name":"AAA-ARBEITEN AUS ANGLISTIK UND AMERIKANISTIK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAA-ARBEITEN AUS ANGLISTIK UND AMERIKANISTIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24053/aaa-2022-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ marginal and end comments are an essential part of teaching and evaluating students’ written work. However, the method can backfire when teachers resort to insincere formulaic praise, fall into the trap of over-commenting, and lose sight of the actual author of the text, appropriating it in the process. The challenges of providing effective written feedback require an examination of students’ attitudes toward it, both to reassure teachers that they are doing better than they think they are, but also to make them aware that there is much room for improvement. For one thing, the remaining weaknesses can be addressed in systematic teacher training on written feedback, which has been lacking. Second, these same teachers should then teach their students how to interpret marginal and final comments and use them to revise their work. The article reviews the research to date in this area and presents a case study that sheds more light on the topic, making it clear that more systematic and holistic research and training would be needed in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对学生写作的书面回应的挑战:表扬、过度评论和挪用
教师的边缘评论和结束评论是学生写作教学和评价的重要组成部分。然而,当教师诉诸于不真诚的公式化赞扬,陷入过度评论的陷阱,并忽视文本的实际作者,在这个过程中挪用文本时,这种方法可能会适得其反。提供有效书面反馈的挑战需要检查学生对反馈的态度,既要让老师相信他们做得比他们想象的要好,又要让他们意识到还有很大的改进空间。首先,剩余的弱点可以通过对教师进行系统的书面反馈培训来解决,而这一培训一直缺乏。其次,这些老师应该教学生如何解读边缘和最终的评论,并用它们来修改他们的作品。这篇文章回顾了迄今为止在这一领域的研究,并提出了一个案例研究,对这一主题有了更多的了解,明确表明这一领域需要更系统、更全面的研究和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal’s main purpose is to demonstrate and celebrate the diversity of English and American Studies, providing a medium for its different branches, especially in the Central European academic context (but not restricted to it). Topics thus range from literary studies to linguistics, from theoretical to applied, from text-focused to culturally-oriented, from novel to film, from textual to contextual, from England to Australia and from the USA to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
Current perspectives on Learner Corpus Research Franz Karl Stanzel, Gratwanderung zwischen Facta und Ficta. Ziele, Zufälle und Umwege in meiner Karriere als anglistischer Literaturwissenschafter. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2022 ELT in the digitale age: We have come a long way Secrets, leaks and the novel. Writers, British intelligence and the public sphere after World War Two Heinz Tschachler, Washington Irving and the fantasy of masculinity. Escaping the woman within. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1