Conceptual Design of a Cybersecurity Resilience Maturity Measurement (CRMM) Framework

U. Mbanaso, Lucienne Abrahams, Oghenevovwero Zion Apene
{"title":"Conceptual Design of a Cybersecurity Resilience Maturity Measurement (CRMM) Framework","authors":"U. Mbanaso, Lucienne Abrahams, Oghenevovwero Zion Apene","doi":"10.23962/10539/27535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African countries are at high risk with respect to cybersecurity breaches and are experiencing substantial financial losses. Amongst the top cybersecurity frameworks, many focus on guidelines with respect to detection, protection and response, but few offer formal frameworks for measuring actual cybersecurity resilience. This article presents the conceptual design for a cybersecurity resilience maturity measurement (CRMM) framework to be applied in organisations, notably for critical information infrastructure (CII), as part of cyber risk management treatment. The main thrusts of the framework are to establish, through assessment in terms of quantitative measures, which cybersecurity controls exist in an organisation, how effective and efficient these controls are with respect to cybersecurity resilience, and steps that need to be taken to improve resilience maturity. The CRMM framework we outline is conceptualised as being applicable both preand post-cyber attack. Drawing on the NIST cybersecurity framework (NIST CSF) and other relevant frameworks, the CRMM approach conceptualised in this article would be able to depict an organisation’s cybersecurity practices and gauge the organisation’s cybersecurity maturity at regular intervals. This CRMM approach is grounded in the idea that, by quantifying an organisation’s current practices against established baseline security controls and global best practices, the resulting status measurement can provide the appropriate basis for managing cyber risk in a consistent and proportionate fashion. The CRMM framework defines four cybersecurity resilience quadrants (CRQs), which depict four different degrees of organisational preparedness, in terms of both risk and resilience.","PeriodicalId":33369,"journal":{"name":"The African Journal of Information and Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The African Journal of Information and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/27535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

African countries are at high risk with respect to cybersecurity breaches and are experiencing substantial financial losses. Amongst the top cybersecurity frameworks, many focus on guidelines with respect to detection, protection and response, but few offer formal frameworks for measuring actual cybersecurity resilience. This article presents the conceptual design for a cybersecurity resilience maturity measurement (CRMM) framework to be applied in organisations, notably for critical information infrastructure (CII), as part of cyber risk management treatment. The main thrusts of the framework are to establish, through assessment in terms of quantitative measures, which cybersecurity controls exist in an organisation, how effective and efficient these controls are with respect to cybersecurity resilience, and steps that need to be taken to improve resilience maturity. The CRMM framework we outline is conceptualised as being applicable both preand post-cyber attack. Drawing on the NIST cybersecurity framework (NIST CSF) and other relevant frameworks, the CRMM approach conceptualised in this article would be able to depict an organisation’s cybersecurity practices and gauge the organisation’s cybersecurity maturity at regular intervals. This CRMM approach is grounded in the idea that, by quantifying an organisation’s current practices against established baseline security controls and global best practices, the resulting status measurement can provide the appropriate basis for managing cyber risk in a consistent and proportionate fashion. The CRMM framework defines four cybersecurity resilience quadrants (CRQs), which depict four different degrees of organisational preparedness, in terms of both risk and resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络安全弹性成熟度测量(CRMM)框架的概念设计
非洲国家在网络安全漏洞方面面临高风险,并正在经历巨大的经济损失。在顶级网络安全框架中,许多框架侧重于检测、保护和响应方面的指导方针,但很少提供衡量实际网络安全弹性的正式框架。本文介绍了网络安全弹性成熟度测量(CRMM)框架的概念设计,该框架将应用于组织,特别是关键信息基础设施(CII),作为网络风险管理处理的一部分。该框架的主要目标是通过定量措施的评估,确定组织中存在哪些网络安全控制措施,这些控制措施在网络安全弹性方面的有效性和效率,以及需要采取哪些步骤来提高弹性成熟度。我们概述的CRMM框架被概念化为既适用于网络攻击前,也适用于网络攻击后。利用NIST网络安全框架(NIST CSF)和其他相关框架,本文中概念化的CRMM方法将能够描述组织的网络安全实践,并定期衡量组织的网络安全成熟度。这种CRMM方法基于这样一种理念,即通过量化组织当前的实践,对照已建立的基线安全控制和全球最佳实践,由此产生的状态测量可以为以一致和相称的方式管理网络风险提供适当的基础。CRMM框架定义了四个网络安全弹性象限(crq),从风险和弹性两个方面描述了四种不同程度的组织准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Media Use, Disbelief and (Mis)information During a Pandemic: An Examination of Young Adult Nigerians’ Interactions with COVID-19 Public Health Messaging Intermediation Capabilities of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Ghana’s Agricultural Extension System Cybersecurity Policymaking in the BRICS Countries: From Addressing National Priorities to Seeking International Cooperation Applying Blockchain Technology to Security-Related Aspects of Electronic Healthcare Record Infrastructure A Sociocultural Framework to Analyse M-Learning Options for Early Childhood Development (ECD) Practitioner Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1