The relation of autonomic biomarkers to the patient's outcome with acute coronary syndrome

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.22317/jcms.v9i1.1264
Zana Abdi, Hishyar MS Garmavy Hussein, S. Rasool
{"title":"The relation of autonomic biomarkers to the patient's outcome with acute coronary syndrome","authors":"Zana Abdi, Hishyar MS Garmavy Hussein, S. Rasool","doi":"10.22317/jcms.v9i1.1264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the neurohormonal activity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and their relation to clinical outcomes by measuring plasma chromogranin A and plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity.\nMethods: In this case-control study, cardiac and neurohormonal parameters were compared between fifty-one patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to the cardiac center in Azadi teaching Hospital in Duhok-Iraq, and thirty comparable gender and age-healthy subjects.\nResults: A significant increase in sympathetic activity was reported in patients with the acute coronary syndrome, reflected by the rise in the plasma chromogranin A compared to the control group (994.47 vs. 1203.95 ng/L, respectively, P<0.05). Meanwhile, cardiac troponin was significantly elevated in those patients compared to healthy subjects (0.17 vs. 4.82 ng/ml, respectively). However, the parasympathetic biomarkers (plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity) did not differ substantially between patients and healthy controls (0.83 vs. 0.92, P > 0.05 and 1.36 vs. 1.37, P>0.05, respectively). Serum troponin I was more valid than chromogranin A in differentiating acute coronary syndrome from healthy subjects. The area under the curve for troponin I was (0.989) compared to ( 0.724) for chromogranin A. Furthermore, plasma chromogranin A but not plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity was significantly increased in fatal cases compared to nonfatal patients (1166.68 vs. 3435.64 ng/L).\nConclusion: Plasma chromogranin A was less effective than troponin I in detecting acute coronary cases; however, it can be helpful as a prognostic marker in those patients. Parasympathetic biomarkers were not appreciable in diagnosing and detecting risky patients. ","PeriodicalId":42860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v9i1.1264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the neurohormonal activity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and their relation to clinical outcomes by measuring plasma chromogranin A and plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity. Methods: In this case-control study, cardiac and neurohormonal parameters were compared between fifty-one patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to the cardiac center in Azadi teaching Hospital in Duhok-Iraq, and thirty comparable gender and age-healthy subjects. Results: A significant increase in sympathetic activity was reported in patients with the acute coronary syndrome, reflected by the rise in the plasma chromogranin A compared to the control group (994.47 vs. 1203.95 ng/L, respectively, P<0.05). Meanwhile, cardiac troponin was significantly elevated in those patients compared to healthy subjects (0.17 vs. 4.82 ng/ml, respectively). However, the parasympathetic biomarkers (plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity) did not differ substantially between patients and healthy controls (0.83 vs. 0.92, P > 0.05 and 1.36 vs. 1.37, P>0.05, respectively). Serum troponin I was more valid than chromogranin A in differentiating acute coronary syndrome from healthy subjects. The area under the curve for troponin I was (0.989) compared to ( 0.724) for chromogranin A. Furthermore, plasma chromogranin A but not plasma and RBC cholinesterase activity was significantly increased in fatal cases compared to nonfatal patients (1166.68 vs. 3435.64 ng/L). Conclusion: Plasma chromogranin A was less effective than troponin I in detecting acute coronary cases; however, it can be helpful as a prognostic marker in those patients. Parasympathetic biomarkers were not appreciable in diagnosing and detecting risky patients. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主神经生物标志物与急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的关系
目的:本研究旨在通过测量血浆嗜铬粒蛋白A、血浆和红细胞胆碱酯酶活性来评估急性冠状动脉综合征患者的神经激素活性及其与临床结果的关系。方法:在这项病例对照研究中,比较了伊拉克杜霍克阿扎迪教学医院心脏中心收治的51名急性冠状动脉综合征患者与30名性别和年龄相当的健康受试者的心脏和神经激素参数。结果:与对照组相比,急性冠状动脉综合征患者的交感神经活性显著增加,反映为血浆嗜铬粒蛋白A的升高(分别为994.47和1203.95纳克/升,P分别为0.05和1.36和1.37,P>0.05)。血清肌钙蛋白I在区分急性冠状动脉综合征和健康受试者方面比嗜铬粒蛋白A更有效。肌钙蛋白I的曲线下面积为(0.989),而嗜铬粒蛋白A为(0.724)。此外,与非致命患者相比,致命病例中血浆嗜铬粒素A而非血浆和红细胞胆碱酯酶活性显著增加(1166.68 vs.3435.64 ng/mL);然而,它可以作为这些患者的预后标志物。副交感神经生物标志物在诊断和检测高危患者方面并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Inadequate Sleep on Blood Pressure among the Population in Zakho District Autism in Iraqi Children: Investigating the CNTNAP2 rs7794745 Polymorphism in the Middle Euphratesv Detection, Optimization, Characterization, and Cytotoxic Effect of Vaginolysin Extracted from Gardnerella Vaginalis Isolated from Iraqi Women Who Had Abortions Determine Biofilm Genes in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolated from Clinical and Environmental Samples Prevalence and Determine Knowledge and Attitude of Tobacco Smoking Among Secondary School Students in Sulaimani City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1