Evaluating possible improvements in indwelling urinary catheter insertion from nurses' point of view: A pilot comparative study of simulated insertion between the novel T-Control® and a Foley-type catheter

C. S. Molina-Mazón RN, MSN, M. Serrano PhD, L. Luque MSc, C. Armas BSc, M. Mòdol MSc, S. Endrényi MEc, M. Luque RN
{"title":"Evaluating possible improvements in indwelling urinary catheter insertion from nurses' point of view: A pilot comparative study of simulated insertion between the novel T-Control® and a Foley-type catheter","authors":"C. S. Molina-Mazón RN, MSN,&nbsp;M. Serrano PhD,&nbsp;L. Luque MSc,&nbsp;C. Armas BSc,&nbsp;M. Mòdol MSc,&nbsp;S. Endrényi MEc,&nbsp;M. Luque RN","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aims of this study are to simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with experienced healthcare professionals in bladder catheterisation and evaluate the usability and functionality of the new catheter compared to conventional Foley-type catheter open and closed systems. A small-scale quantitative study was conducted with 11 professionals who had a minimum of 3 years of professional experience, and 1 year of experience in bladder catheterisation. To test the advantages of the new T-Control® urinary catheter, a Living Lab, which is an instrument designed to test innovative solutions in real-life environments with users, was performed. The catheters used in the simulation were: a conventional Foley-type catheter in an open system, a conventional Foley-type catheter in a closed system, and the new T-Control® catheter. The participants evaluated the insertions through a satisfaction questionnaire and by a nurse expert utilizing a usability questionnaire after the complete visualization of the Living Lab was recorded. T-Control® reduced by 27.3% the contamination of the urine collection bag and the contamination of the urine collection bag connector. Accidental spillages when connecting the urine collection bag were also reduced by 54.5% using the T-Control® catheter, reducing the workload and reducing occupational accidents before connecting the urine bag. The trainer considered satisfactory 9/12 T-Control® insertions performed, improving the number of satisfactory insertions observed with the Foley-type catheter open and closed systems (with 3/12 and 7/12 results respectively). T-Control® was the best-rated product by the participants, requiring less time, and physical and mental effort. Fifty percent of the nurses would exclusively recommend T-Control® in their units, while the other half would recommend it in combination with others. The insertion of T-Control® makes the bladder catheterisation procedure easier and safer. The preparation of the sterile field requires less material since it does not include the urine collection bag while the fluid-controlling system favours the reduction of contamination and accidental spillages. Based on the nurses’ evaluation, T-Control® with its integrated urine-controlling system could bring additional benefits to the healthcare staff for catheterisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 3","pages":"226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study are to simulate the insertion of the new T-Control® urinary catheter with experienced healthcare professionals in bladder catheterisation and evaluate the usability and functionality of the new catheter compared to conventional Foley-type catheter open and closed systems. A small-scale quantitative study was conducted with 11 professionals who had a minimum of 3 years of professional experience, and 1 year of experience in bladder catheterisation. To test the advantages of the new T-Control® urinary catheter, a Living Lab, which is an instrument designed to test innovative solutions in real-life environments with users, was performed. The catheters used in the simulation were: a conventional Foley-type catheter in an open system, a conventional Foley-type catheter in a closed system, and the new T-Control® catheter. The participants evaluated the insertions through a satisfaction questionnaire and by a nurse expert utilizing a usability questionnaire after the complete visualization of the Living Lab was recorded. T-Control® reduced by 27.3% the contamination of the urine collection bag and the contamination of the urine collection bag connector. Accidental spillages when connecting the urine collection bag were also reduced by 54.5% using the T-Control® catheter, reducing the workload and reducing occupational accidents before connecting the urine bag. The trainer considered satisfactory 9/12 T-Control® insertions performed, improving the number of satisfactory insertions observed with the Foley-type catheter open and closed systems (with 3/12 and 7/12 results respectively). T-Control® was the best-rated product by the participants, requiring less time, and physical and mental effort. Fifty percent of the nurses would exclusively recommend T-Control® in their units, while the other half would recommend it in combination with others. The insertion of T-Control® makes the bladder catheterisation procedure easier and safer. The preparation of the sterile field requires less material since it does not include the urine collection bag while the fluid-controlling system favours the reduction of contamination and accidental spillages. Based on the nurses’ evaluation, T-Control® with its integrated urine-controlling system could bring additional benefits to the healthcare staff for catheterisation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从护士的角度评估留置导尿管置入的可能改进:一项新型T - Control®和Foley型导尿管模拟置入的试点比较研究
本研究的目的是模拟新的T-Control®导尿管与经验丰富的医疗保健专业人员在膀胱导尿中的插入,并与传统的foley型导尿管开放和封闭系统相比,评估新导尿管的可用性和功能。对11名至少有3年专业经验和1年膀胱导尿经验的专业人员进行了一项小规模定量研究。为了测试新型T-Control®导尿管的优势,进行了Living Lab,这是一种旨在与用户在现实生活环境中测试创新解决方案的仪器。在模拟中使用的导管是:开放系统中的传统foley型导管,封闭系统中的传统foley型导管和新型T-Control®导管。参与者通过满意度问卷和护士专家使用可用性问卷评估插入,在生活实验室的完整可视化记录后。T-Control®减少了27.3%的尿液收集袋污染和尿液收集袋连接器污染。使用T-Control®导尿管,连接尿液收集袋时的意外溢出也减少了54.5%,减少了工作量,减少了连接尿液袋前的职业事故。培训师认为完成了9/12次T-Control®插入,提高了foley型导管开放和封闭系统观察到的令人满意的插入次数(分别为3/12和7/12)。T-Control®是参与者评价最好的产品,需要更少的时间和体力和精神努力。50%的护士会在他们的单位单独推荐T-Control®,而另一半则会联合推荐T-Control®。T-Control®的插入使膀胱导尿过程更容易、更安全。无菌场的准备需要较少的材料,因为它不包括尿液收集袋,而流体控制系统有利于减少污染和意外溢出。根据护士的评价,T-Control集成尿控系统可以为医护人员导尿带来额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1