The Abstraction of Sovereignty: The Ottoman Empire in Early Twentieth-Century Socialist Thought

IF 1.1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Twentieth Century British History Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1093/tcbh/hwac023
F. Zaman
{"title":"The Abstraction of Sovereignty: The Ottoman Empire in Early Twentieth-Century Socialist Thought","authors":"F. Zaman","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwac023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the way British socialists came to provide intellectual and political weight to the ‘internationalizing’ of non-European territory during and after the First World War. While there is now a substantial body of scholarship articulating the continuities between Victorian liberal imperialism and the liberal internationalism of the early twentieth century that gave rise, most notably, to the League of Nations’ mandates system, parallel developments within socialist thought in Britain have been less readily noted. Critically, leading Fabian Society intellectuals reaffirmed the late nineteenth-century belief that European powers had the legal as well as moral right to partition and internationalize territories and markets in the name of preserving peace and advancing prosperity. Indeed, in the drive to produce conceptually robust positions on problems of world order, in certain respects socialists went furthest in scope and ambition. An aspect of this dynamic is explored here by paying particular attention to the place of the Ottoman Empire in socialist discussions of international government and the mandates system.","PeriodicalId":46051,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth Century British History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth Century British History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwac023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the way British socialists came to provide intellectual and political weight to the ‘internationalizing’ of non-European territory during and after the First World War. While there is now a substantial body of scholarship articulating the continuities between Victorian liberal imperialism and the liberal internationalism of the early twentieth century that gave rise, most notably, to the League of Nations’ mandates system, parallel developments within socialist thought in Britain have been less readily noted. Critically, leading Fabian Society intellectuals reaffirmed the late nineteenth-century belief that European powers had the legal as well as moral right to partition and internationalize territories and markets in the name of preserving peace and advancing prosperity. Indeed, in the drive to produce conceptually robust positions on problems of world order, in certain respects socialists went furthest in scope and ambition. An aspect of this dynamic is explored here by paying particular attention to the place of the Ottoman Empire in socialist discussions of international government and the mandates system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主权的抽象:20世纪早期社会主义思想中的奥斯曼帝国
本文考察了英国社会主义者在第一次世界大战期间和之后为非欧洲领土的“国际化”提供知识和政治份量的方式。虽然现在有大量的学术研究阐明了维多利亚时代的自由帝国主义与20世纪初的自由国际主义之间的连续性,其中最引人注目的是国际联盟的授权制度,但英国社会主义思想内部的平行发展却很少被注意到。重要的是,费边社的主要知识分子重申了19世纪末的一种信念,即欧洲列强在维护和平和促进繁荣的名义下,既有法律上的权利,也有道德上的权利来分割和国际化领土和市场。的确,在对世界秩序问题提出概念上强有力的立场的过程中,在某些方面,社会主义者在范围和野心上走得最远。通过特别关注奥斯曼帝国在社会主义关于国际政府和委任制度的讨论中的地位,本文探讨了这种动态的一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Twentieth Century British History covers the variety of British history in the twentieth century in all its aspects. It links the many different and specialized branches of historical scholarship with work in political science and related disciplines. The journal seeks to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries, in order to foster the study of patterns of change and continuity across the twentieth century. The editors are committed to publishing work that examines the British experience within a comparative context, whether European or Anglo-American.
期刊最新文献
Imagining Economic Growth in Post-War Britain. Duncan Tanner Essay Prize Winner 2022. Going Up in Smoke: Tobacco and Government Policy in the Age of Austerity, 1945-50. The European Dimension of the 'talks process' in Northern Ireland. Mass-Observation and Vernacular Politics at the 1945 General Election.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1