FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM SATELLITE IMAGES USING SEGNET AND FULLY CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS (FCN)

IF 3.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.26833/ijeg.645426
Batuhan Sariturk, B. Bayram, Z. Duran, D. Seker
{"title":"FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM SATELLITE IMAGES USING SEGNET AND FULLY CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS (FCN)","authors":"Batuhan Sariturk, B. Bayram, Z. Duran, D. Seker","doi":"10.26833/ijeg.645426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object detection and classification are among the most popular topics in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing studies. With technological developments, a large number of high-resolution satellite images have been obtained and it has become possible to distinguish many different objects. Despite all these developments, the need for human intervention in object detection and classification is seen as one of the major problems. Machine learning has been used as a priority option to this day to reduce this need. Although success has been achieved with this method, human intervention is still needed. Deep learning provides a great convenience by eliminating this problem. Deep learning methods carry out the learning process on raw data unlike traditional machine learning methods. Although deep learning has a long history, the main reasons for its increased popularity in recent years are; the availability of sufficient data for the training process and the availability of hardware to process the data. In this study, a performance comparison was made between two different convolutional neural network architectures (SegNet and Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN)) which are used for object segmentation and classification on images. These two different models were trained using the same training dataset and their performances have been evaluated using the same test dataset. The results show that, for building segmentation, there is not much significant difference between these two architectures in terms of accuracy, but FCN architecture is more successful than SegNet by 1%. However, this situation may vary according to the dataset used during the training of the system.","PeriodicalId":42633,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.645426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Object detection and classification are among the most popular topics in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing studies. With technological developments, a large number of high-resolution satellite images have been obtained and it has become possible to distinguish many different objects. Despite all these developments, the need for human intervention in object detection and classification is seen as one of the major problems. Machine learning has been used as a priority option to this day to reduce this need. Although success has been achieved with this method, human intervention is still needed. Deep learning provides a great convenience by eliminating this problem. Deep learning methods carry out the learning process on raw data unlike traditional machine learning methods. Although deep learning has a long history, the main reasons for its increased popularity in recent years are; the availability of sufficient data for the training process and the availability of hardware to process the data. In this study, a performance comparison was made between two different convolutional neural network architectures (SegNet and Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN)) which are used for object segmentation and classification on images. These two different models were trained using the same training dataset and their performances have been evaluated using the same test dataset. The results show that, for building segmentation, there is not much significant difference between these two architectures in terms of accuracy, but FCN architecture is more successful than SegNet by 1%. However, this situation may vary according to the dataset used during the training of the system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于SEGNET和全卷积网络的卫星图像特征提取
目标检测和分类是摄影测量和遥感研究中最受欢迎的课题之一。随着技术的发展,已经获得了大量的高分辨率卫星图像,并且可以区分许多不同的物体。尽管有这些发展,但在物体检测和分类方面需要人为干预被视为主要问题之一。机器学习一直被用作减少这种需求的优先选择。尽管这种方法已经取得了成功,但仍然需要人为干预。深度学习通过消除这个问题提供了极大的便利。与传统的机器学习方法不同,深度学习方法在原始数据上进行学习过程。尽管深度学习有着悠久的历史,但近年来它越来越受欢迎的主要原因是:;用于训练过程的足够数据的可用性以及处理数据的硬件的可用性。在本研究中,对用于图像对象分割和分类的两种不同卷积神经网络架构(SegNet和全卷积网络(FCN))进行了性能比较。这两个不同的模型使用相同的训练数据集进行训练,并使用相同的测试数据集评估了它们的性能。结果表明,对于建筑物分割,这两种架构在准确性方面没有太大差异,但FCN架构比SegNet成功了1%。然而,这种情况可能会根据系统训练期间使用的数据集而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Registration of Interferometric DEM by Deep Artificial Neural Networks Using GPS Control Points’ Coordinates as Network Target Comparative Analysis of Non-Invasive Measurement Methods for Optimizing Architectural Documentation A benchmark dataset for deep learning-based airplane detection: HRPlanes Methodology of real-time 3D point cloud mapping with UAV lidar Proliferation of Dichotomy Urban Settlements Plight: Land Governance And Sustainable Built Environment In Tanzania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1