Eric Lenneberg and Motor Control

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Biolinguistics Pub Date : 2017-12-31 DOI:10.5964/bioling.9113
A. Cohen
{"title":"Eric Lenneberg and Motor Control","authors":"A. Cohen","doi":"10.5964/bioling.9113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I began my graduate career in 1970. I was somewhat familiar with Eric Lenneberg, having met him during an event for faculty in Psychology and Neuroscience—the fields in which I was interested at the time. He had just arrived at Cornell, as had I, and he didn’t have many other graduate students at that time. I chose him as my graduate faculty advisor. He directed me toward the study of the development of motor control, one of his fields of interest (cf. Lenneberg’s classic, Biological Foundations of Language, 1967). His other students were urged to study the development of language, in which he was most well known. These students went with Eric to New York to study patients with aphasia, while I stayed behind at Cornell in Ithaca, with my young children. That ended up suiting me well! When I began graduate school, I was unsure of the direction or level I wished to attain. This was the 1960s and women were not particularly accustomed to graduate school or aiming high, especially if already married with children, which I was. My husband was a faculty member in the Cornell Mathematics Department, and our children were quite young: one was six and one was four. Eric Lenneberg, who had just begun his time as a faculty member at Cornell University, had participated in a forum I organized for theoreticians of science, and was the only faculty member of neuroscience I knew at all well, since he had participated in the forum. My thesis, when finally completed also included results of a project done after Eric’s death with Professors Carl Gans, University of Michigan, and Farish Jenkins, Harvard University, on rat muscle activity during running. Both sets of results were integrated into my dissertation on rat locomotion, unfortunately, with Professor Gans as my advisor and without Eric on my committee. As a post-doctoral fellow, I remained at Cornell for a few years with funding from a National Institutes of Helath (NIH) grant, which fortunately, I was able to obtain independently. At that point I also became interested in mathematical modeling of the phenomena on which I was working, another area that Eric had urged me toward and about which he was enthusiastic. This resulted in my most cited publication: Cohen, Holmes & Rand (1982). It has been perhaps my most important publication and the fact that it was and still is being widely cited is a testament to its importance in establishing theoretical neuroscience. After this work, which was completed early with two mathematical colleagues, Philip Holmes and Richard Rand, both professors at Cornell at that time, I continued doing research in my own laboratory, also at Cornell. I chose the detailed study","PeriodicalId":54041,"journal":{"name":"Biolinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biolinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.9113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I began my graduate career in 1970. I was somewhat familiar with Eric Lenneberg, having met him during an event for faculty in Psychology and Neuroscience—the fields in which I was interested at the time. He had just arrived at Cornell, as had I, and he didn’t have many other graduate students at that time. I chose him as my graduate faculty advisor. He directed me toward the study of the development of motor control, one of his fields of interest (cf. Lenneberg’s classic, Biological Foundations of Language, 1967). His other students were urged to study the development of language, in which he was most well known. These students went with Eric to New York to study patients with aphasia, while I stayed behind at Cornell in Ithaca, with my young children. That ended up suiting me well! When I began graduate school, I was unsure of the direction or level I wished to attain. This was the 1960s and women were not particularly accustomed to graduate school or aiming high, especially if already married with children, which I was. My husband was a faculty member in the Cornell Mathematics Department, and our children were quite young: one was six and one was four. Eric Lenneberg, who had just begun his time as a faculty member at Cornell University, had participated in a forum I organized for theoreticians of science, and was the only faculty member of neuroscience I knew at all well, since he had participated in the forum. My thesis, when finally completed also included results of a project done after Eric’s death with Professors Carl Gans, University of Michigan, and Farish Jenkins, Harvard University, on rat muscle activity during running. Both sets of results were integrated into my dissertation on rat locomotion, unfortunately, with Professor Gans as my advisor and without Eric on my committee. As a post-doctoral fellow, I remained at Cornell for a few years with funding from a National Institutes of Helath (NIH) grant, which fortunately, I was able to obtain independently. At that point I also became interested in mathematical modeling of the phenomena on which I was working, another area that Eric had urged me toward and about which he was enthusiastic. This resulted in my most cited publication: Cohen, Holmes & Rand (1982). It has been perhaps my most important publication and the fact that it was and still is being widely cited is a testament to its importance in establishing theoretical neuroscience. After this work, which was completed early with two mathematical colleagues, Philip Holmes and Richard Rand, both professors at Cornell at that time, I continued doing research in my own laboratory, also at Cornell. I chose the detailed study
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eric Lenneberg和电机控制
我从1970年开始了我的研究生生涯。我对Eric Lenneberg有些熟悉,是在当时我感兴趣的心理学和神经科学学院的一次活动中认识他的。他和我刚到康奈尔大学,那时他没有多少其他研究生。我选择他作为我的研究生导师。他指导我研究运动控制的发展,这是他感兴趣的领域之一(参见Lenneberg的经典著作《语言的生物学基础》,1967年)。他的其他学生被要求学习语言的发展,他在这方面最为人所知。这些学生和埃里克一起去了纽约研究失语症患者,而我和年幼的孩子们留在伊萨卡的康奈尔大学。这很适合我!当我开始读研究生时,我不确定自己想要达到的方向或水平。那是20世纪60年代,女性并不特别习惯读研或追求高目标,尤其是如果已经结婚生子,我就是这样。我丈夫是康奈尔大学数学系的一名教员,我们的孩子都很小:一个六岁,一个四岁。Eric Lenneberg刚刚开始在康奈尔大学担任教员,他参加了我为科学理论家组织的一个论坛,也是我唯一熟悉的神经科学教员,因为他参加了这个论坛。我的论文最终完成时,还包括埃里克去世后与密歇根大学的卡尔·甘斯教授和哈佛大学的法里什·詹金斯教授共同完成的一个项目的结果,该项目研究了老鼠在跑步过程中的肌肉活动。不幸的是,这两组结果都被整合到了我关于老鼠运动的论文中,甘斯教授是我的顾问,埃里克没有加入我的委员会。作为一名博士后研究员,我在康奈尔大学呆了几年,得到了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的资助,幸运的是,我能够独立获得这笔资助。在那一点上,我也对我正在研究的现象的数学建模感兴趣,这是埃里克敦促我去做的另一个领域,也是他热衷的领域。这导致了我被引用最多的出版物:Cohen,Holmes&Rand(1982)。它可能是我最重要的出版物,它过去和现在都被广泛引用,这证明了它在建立理论神经科学方面的重要性。这项工作很早就与当时康奈尔大学的两位数学同事菲利普·霍姆斯和理查德·兰德一起完成了,之后我继续在自己的实验室里做研究,也在康奈尔大学。我选择了详细的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biolinguistics
Biolinguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biolinguistics end-of-year notice 2023 Why large language models are poor theories of human linguistic cognition: A reply to Piantadosi Social evolution and commitment: Bridging the gap between formal linguistic theories and language evolution research A future without a past: Philosophical consequences of Merge Eademne sunt?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1