A complex balance: assessing perspectives on decommissioning large dams to restore river ecosystems

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Water International Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/02508060.2023.2234225
Joshua Matanzima, Teboho Mosuoe-Tsietsi
{"title":"A complex balance: assessing perspectives on decommissioning large dams to restore river ecosystems","authors":"Joshua Matanzima, Teboho Mosuoe-Tsietsi","doi":"10.1080/02508060.2023.2234225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, critics of large dams have raised fundamental questions around the necessity and benefits of large dams. A large dam is defined as one with a height of 15 m or more from the lowest foundation to the crest, or a dam between 5 and 15 m impounding more than 3 million cubic metres of water (International Commission on Large Dams, 2011). Since the focus of this article is on large dams, the term ‘dams’ may be used in reference to large dams. Two significant questions have reoccurred in debates on large dams: Should we build more dams or not? Is there a good large dam? Thayer Scudder has expressed a clear opposition to ‘good’ large dams (Scudder, 2017). This is largely due to the evidence that suggests that the persistent, negative socio-economic and environmental costs of large dams exceed their proclaimed economic benefits (Schulz & Adams, 2019; Sovacool & Bulan, 2011). Based on a statistical analysis of 245 large dams in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and North America built between 1934 and 2007, Ansar et al. (2014, p. 2) concluded that ‘even before accounting for negative impacts on human society and the environment, the actual construction costs of large dams are too high to yield a positive return’. Consequently, there have been calls not only to cease the construction of large dams but also to decommission existing ‘unnecessary’ dams (Ansar et al., 2014; Scudder, 2017, 2019). An unnecessary dam is one whose existence is deemed unjustifiable because its negative risks and impacts are considered to outweigh its perceived benefits. Dam decommissioning refers to the process of removing or ceasing the operation of a dam because its negative effects outweigh their perceived benefits. Dam removal is an important tool for river restoration and addressing ageing infrastructure. It is an ongoing process as a large number of ageing dams that are no longer serving their original purposes have become safety liabilities, or represent potential for river system restoration if they are taken down (Duda & Bellmore, 2022). There are two categories of dam removal processes: full and partial decommissioning. Full removal entirely reestablishes the free-flowing conditions in a river because all physical obstacles are abolished, and the river’s continuity is restored (Ayboga, n.d.). Dam removal allows for","PeriodicalId":49371,"journal":{"name":"Water International","volume":"48 1","pages":"615 - 630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2023.2234225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, critics of large dams have raised fundamental questions around the necessity and benefits of large dams. A large dam is defined as one with a height of 15 m or more from the lowest foundation to the crest, or a dam between 5 and 15 m impounding more than 3 million cubic metres of water (International Commission on Large Dams, 2011). Since the focus of this article is on large dams, the term ‘dams’ may be used in reference to large dams. Two significant questions have reoccurred in debates on large dams: Should we build more dams or not? Is there a good large dam? Thayer Scudder has expressed a clear opposition to ‘good’ large dams (Scudder, 2017). This is largely due to the evidence that suggests that the persistent, negative socio-economic and environmental costs of large dams exceed their proclaimed economic benefits (Schulz & Adams, 2019; Sovacool & Bulan, 2011). Based on a statistical analysis of 245 large dams in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and North America built between 1934 and 2007, Ansar et al. (2014, p. 2) concluded that ‘even before accounting for negative impacts on human society and the environment, the actual construction costs of large dams are too high to yield a positive return’. Consequently, there have been calls not only to cease the construction of large dams but also to decommission existing ‘unnecessary’ dams (Ansar et al., 2014; Scudder, 2017, 2019). An unnecessary dam is one whose existence is deemed unjustifiable because its negative risks and impacts are considered to outweigh its perceived benefits. Dam decommissioning refers to the process of removing or ceasing the operation of a dam because its negative effects outweigh their perceived benefits. Dam removal is an important tool for river restoration and addressing ageing infrastructure. It is an ongoing process as a large number of ageing dams that are no longer serving their original purposes have become safety liabilities, or represent potential for river system restoration if they are taken down (Duda & Bellmore, 2022). There are two categories of dam removal processes: full and partial decommissioning. Full removal entirely reestablishes the free-flowing conditions in a river because all physical obstacles are abolished, and the river’s continuity is restored (Ayboga, n.d.). Dam removal allows for
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个复杂的平衡:评估大型水坝退役以恢复河流生态系统的观点
近年来,大型水坝的批评者围绕大型水坝的必要性和效益提出了根本性的问题。大坝是指从最低基础到坝顶高度为15米或以上的大坝,或蓄水量超过300万立方米的5米至15米的大坝(国际大坝委员会,2011年)。由于本文的重点是大型水坝,因此“水坝”一词可用于指代大型水坝。在关于大型水坝的辩论中,两个重要问题再次出现:我们是否应该建造更多的水坝?有好的大坝吗?Thayer Scudder明确反对“好的”大型水坝(Scudder,2017)。这在很大程度上是因为有证据表明,大型水坝持续的负面社会经济和环境成本超过了其宣称的经济效益(Schulz&Adams,2019;Sovacool和Bulan,2011年)。根据对1934年至2007年间在非洲、亚洲、欧洲、拉丁美洲和北美建造的245座大坝的统计分析,Ansar等人(2014,第2页)得出结论,“即使在考虑对人类社会和环境的负面影响之前,大坝的实际建造成本也太高,无法产生积极的回报”。因此,不仅有人呼吁停止建造大型水坝,还呼吁退役现有的“不必要”水坝(Ansar等人,2014;斯库德尔,20172019)。不必要的大坝是指其存在被认为是不合理的,因为其负面风险和影响被认为超过了其感知的好处。大坝退役是指拆除或停止大坝运行的过程,因为其负面影响超过了其感知的好处。大坝拆除是恢复河流和解决老化基础设施问题的重要工具。这是一个持续的过程,因为大量不再用于其原始目的的老化大坝已成为安全责任,或者如果被拆除,则代表着河流系统恢复的潜力(Duda&Bellmore,2022)。大坝拆除过程分为两类:完全退役和部分退役。完全拆除完全重建了河流的自由流动条件,因为所有物理障碍都被消除了,河流的连续性也得到了恢复(Ayboga,n.d.)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water International
Water International 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Water International is the official journal of the International Water Resources Association (IWRA), founded in 1972 to serve as an international gateway to the people, ideas and networks that are critical to the sustainable management of water resources around the world. Water International''s articles, state-of-the-art reviews, technical notes and other matter are policy-relevant and aimed at communicating in-depth knowledge to a multidisciplinary and international community. Water International publishes both individual contributions and thematic special issues and sections on cutting edge issues. All individual manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal and peer review by the Deputy Editor in Chief and the Associate Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by at least one independent, anonymous expert referee. All external peer review is double blind. Thematic issues and sections are handled under comparable procedures by guest editors under the oversight of the Editor in Chief.
期刊最新文献
Irrigation is more than irrigating: agricultural green water interventions contribute to blue water depletion and the global water crisis Editors’ introduction Basin organization and members’ development agenda in the Global South Lessons from the last 30 years for future water resource management in national and transboundary catchments Introduction to section 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1