Local Governance and Traditional Authority in the Kingdom of Eswatini: The Evolving Tinkhundla Regime

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES African Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00020184.2021.1940843
Ntombini Marrengane
{"title":"Local Governance and Traditional Authority in the Kingdom of Eswatini: The Evolving Tinkhundla Regime","authors":"Ntombini Marrengane","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2021.1940843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Landmark constitutional and local government reforms have reshaped local governance in the Kingdom of Eswatini, formerly the Kingdom of Swaziland, since the promulgation of the first post-independence constitution in 2005. After more than 30 years of suspended constitutional rule under the leadership of the Ngwenyama (the Lion) and King governed by the Swazi system of traditional authority, a critical step has been taken to define and regulate the dual system of authority, constituted of administrative local government and traditional leaders. However, the legacy of the long-established bifurcated system of local governance has proven challenging to overcome. This article presents a view of the Kingdom of Eswatini from the perspective of local administration, which at present maintains two systems of governance – urban local government and the tinkhundla (traditional authority systems that operate the length and breadth of the country, including in urban areas). In the face of urbanisation, the administrative state has developed and modified its approach to urban management and engagement with traditional authorities over time. Drawing on a case study of the Mbabane upgrading and finance project, launched in 2005 and aimed at creating a ‘city without slums’, this paper analyses how local authorities in Eswatini responded to the imperative to engage with traditional authorities in the wake of unsuccessful and sustained efforts to bypass their influence. Three different strategies were adopted by the urban local authorities to effectively govern urban areas and manage the influence of traditional authorities. These shifting strategies reflect the evolving policy agenda at the urban scale in Eswatini and the limitations of a rigid bifurcated system in contemporary Swazi cities.","PeriodicalId":51769,"journal":{"name":"African Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"249 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00020184.2021.1940843","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2021.1940843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Landmark constitutional and local government reforms have reshaped local governance in the Kingdom of Eswatini, formerly the Kingdom of Swaziland, since the promulgation of the first post-independence constitution in 2005. After more than 30 years of suspended constitutional rule under the leadership of the Ngwenyama (the Lion) and King governed by the Swazi system of traditional authority, a critical step has been taken to define and regulate the dual system of authority, constituted of administrative local government and traditional leaders. However, the legacy of the long-established bifurcated system of local governance has proven challenging to overcome. This article presents a view of the Kingdom of Eswatini from the perspective of local administration, which at present maintains two systems of governance – urban local government and the tinkhundla (traditional authority systems that operate the length and breadth of the country, including in urban areas). In the face of urbanisation, the administrative state has developed and modified its approach to urban management and engagement with traditional authorities over time. Drawing on a case study of the Mbabane upgrading and finance project, launched in 2005 and aimed at creating a ‘city without slums’, this paper analyses how local authorities in Eswatini responded to the imperative to engage with traditional authorities in the wake of unsuccessful and sustained efforts to bypass their influence. Three different strategies were adopted by the urban local authorities to effectively govern urban areas and manage the influence of traditional authorities. These shifting strategies reflect the evolving policy agenda at the urban scale in Eswatini and the limitations of a rigid bifurcated system in contemporary Swazi cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯威士兰王国的地方治理与传统权威:廷昆德拉政权的演变
摘要:自2005年颁布第一部独立后宪法以来,斯威士兰王国(前身为斯威士兰王国)的宪法和地方政府改革重塑了地方治理。在恩文亚马(狮子)和国王的领导下,在斯威士兰传统权力体系的统治下,宪法统治暂停了30多年,现在已经迈出了定义和规范由行政地方政府和传统领导人组成的双重权力体系的关键一步。然而,长期建立的地方治理分叉体系的遗留问题已被证明是难以克服的。本文从地方行政的角度介绍了斯威士兰王国的观点,该国目前维持着两种治理体系——城市地方政府和廷昆德拉(在全国范围内运作的传统权力体系,包括在城市地区)。面对城市化,随着时间的推移,行政国家发展和修改了其城市管理方法以及与传统当局的接触。根据2005年启动的旨在创建一个“没有贫民窟的城市”的姆巴巴内升级和融资项目的案例研究,本文分析了斯威士兰地方当局在绕过传统当局影响的持续努力失败后,如何应对与传统当局接触的必要性。城市地方当局采取了三种不同的战略来有效地管理城市地区和管理传统当局的影响。这些变化的战略反映了斯威士兰城市层面不断演变的政策议程,以及当代斯威士兰城市僵化的分叉系统的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies
African Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sincere Intimacy, Genre and Heterotopology of a Confessional Public Communal Land and Belonging Among Foreign Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy Neoliberal Leveraging of the Colonial Imagination: A Global South Reading of Tobacco Ads in Africa Entrenched Coloniality? Colonial-Born Black Women, Hair and Identity in Post-Apartheid South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1