Who succeeds and who fails? Exploring the role of background variables in explaining the outcomes of L2 language tests

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2022-07-24 DOI:10.1177/02655322221100115
Ann-Kristin Helland Gujord
{"title":"Who succeeds and who fails? Exploring the role of background variables in explaining the outcomes of L2 language tests","authors":"Ann-Kristin Helland Gujord","doi":"10.1177/02655322221100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores whether and to what extent the background information supplied by 10,155 immigrants who took an official language test in Norwegian affected their chances of passing one, two, or all three parts of the test. The background information included in the analysis was prior education, region (location of their home country), language (first language [L1] background, knowledge of English), second language (hours of second language [L2] instruction, L2 use), L1 community (years of residence, contact with L1 speakers), age, and gender. An ordered logistic regression analysis revealed that eight of the hypothesised explanatory variables significantly impacted the dependent variable (test result). Several of the significant variables relate to pre-immigration conditions, such as educational opportunities earlier in life. The findings have implications for language testing and also, to some extent, for the understanding of variation in learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":"40 1","pages":"227 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221100115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explores whether and to what extent the background information supplied by 10,155 immigrants who took an official language test in Norwegian affected their chances of passing one, two, or all three parts of the test. The background information included in the analysis was prior education, region (location of their home country), language (first language [L1] background, knowledge of English), second language (hours of second language [L2] instruction, L2 use), L1 community (years of residence, contact with L1 speakers), age, and gender. An ordered logistic regression analysis revealed that eight of the hypothesised explanatory variables significantly impacted the dependent variable (test result). Several of the significant variables relate to pre-immigration conditions, such as educational opportunities earlier in life. The findings have implications for language testing and also, to some extent, for the understanding of variation in learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁成功了,谁失败了?探讨背景变量在解释第二语言测试结果中的作用
这项研究探讨了10155名参加挪威官方语言测试的移民提供的背景信息是否以及在多大程度上影响了他们通过测试的一个、两个或全部三个部分的机会。分析中包含的背景信息包括先前教育、地区(母国所在地)、语言(第一语言[L1]背景、英语知识)、第二语言(第二语言[L2]教学时数、L2使用)、母语社区(居住年限、与母语使用者接触)、年龄和性别。有序逻辑回归分析显示,八个假设的解释变量显著影响因变量(检验结果)。几个重要的变量与移民前的条件有关,比如生命早期的教育机会。这些发现对语言测试有启示,在某种程度上,对学习结果变化的理解也有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Can language test providers do more to support open science? A response to Winke Considerations to promote and accelerate Open Science: A response to Winke Evaluating the impact of nonverbal behavior on language ability ratings Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing Open Science in language assessment research contexts: A reply to Winke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1