Taradale Meets The Ideal Society and its Enemies

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.7810/9781877242175_17
C. Daley
{"title":"Taradale Meets The Ideal Society and its Enemies","authors":"C. Daley","doi":"10.7810/9781877242175_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN a very favourable review of Miles Fairburn's The Ideal Society and its Enemies, Alan Ward suggested that 'Fairburn has set the terms of debate for some time to come. His terms, his statistics, his chronology will be challenged by specialists in the field. But the categories he has used will no doubt illuminate comparable studies of the twentieth century — and perhaps produce surprises for Fairburn himself.' In the same publication, Rollo Arnold began that challenge, especially to Fairburn's statistics, questioning the transience figures he used for \"Normanby and Marton. The argument and pace of The Ideal Society and its Enemies are intense. The reader is swept along as Fairburn outlines and then rejects alternative interpretations of nineteenth-century New Zealand before offering his own atomization thesis. His book is undoubtedly one of the most important recent works in Pakeha historiography. It is therefore crucial to step back from it and critically assess the validity of its central thesis and to do so now, before a Fairburnian legend of nineteenth-century Pakeha society becomes entrenched. I have been engaged in an historical study of Taradale, in Hawke's Bay. Today Taradale is a suburb of Napier but in the time period of my work, 18861930, it was quite a separate area, with never more than 3000 inhabitants. Taradale provides us with an opportunity to test the general theory Fairburn propounds on a particular place. As Ward predicted, I intend to question Fairburn's terms, statistics and chronology as Taradale meets The Ideal Society and its Enemies. Two aspects of Fairburn's terminology I will question first: his notion of atomization, and his use and rejection of the idea of local community. Since at least the early 1980s, Fairburn has been promoting the idea of atomization. He believes that the nature of the immigrant population, combined with the situation they faced in New Zealand, meant that people in the second half of the nineteenth century, especially 1850-80, were atomized. They travelled to New Zealand either alone or without extended family support. More men than women migrated and immigrants tended to be young: Pakeha New Zealand had an age and sex imbalance in its population. On arrival, these people did not settle","PeriodicalId":51937,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF HISTORY","volume":"25 1","pages":"129 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7810/9781877242175_17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

IN a very favourable review of Miles Fairburn's The Ideal Society and its Enemies, Alan Ward suggested that 'Fairburn has set the terms of debate for some time to come. His terms, his statistics, his chronology will be challenged by specialists in the field. But the categories he has used will no doubt illuminate comparable studies of the twentieth century — and perhaps produce surprises for Fairburn himself.' In the same publication, Rollo Arnold began that challenge, especially to Fairburn's statistics, questioning the transience figures he used for "Normanby and Marton. The argument and pace of The Ideal Society and its Enemies are intense. The reader is swept along as Fairburn outlines and then rejects alternative interpretations of nineteenth-century New Zealand before offering his own atomization thesis. His book is undoubtedly one of the most important recent works in Pakeha historiography. It is therefore crucial to step back from it and critically assess the validity of its central thesis and to do so now, before a Fairburnian legend of nineteenth-century Pakeha society becomes entrenched. I have been engaged in an historical study of Taradale, in Hawke's Bay. Today Taradale is a suburb of Napier but in the time period of my work, 18861930, it was quite a separate area, with never more than 3000 inhabitants. Taradale provides us with an opportunity to test the general theory Fairburn propounds on a particular place. As Ward predicted, I intend to question Fairburn's terms, statistics and chronology as Taradale meets The Ideal Society and its Enemies. Two aspects of Fairburn's terminology I will question first: his notion of atomization, and his use and rejection of the idea of local community. Since at least the early 1980s, Fairburn has been promoting the idea of atomization. He believes that the nature of the immigrant population, combined with the situation they faced in New Zealand, meant that people in the second half of the nineteenth century, especially 1850-80, were atomized. They travelled to New Zealand either alone or without extended family support. More men than women migrated and immigrants tended to be young: Pakeha New Zealand had an age and sex imbalance in its population. On arrival, these people did not settle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔拉代尔遇到理想社会和它的敌人
艾伦·沃德(Alan Ward)对迈尔斯·费尔伯恩(Miles Fairburn)的《理想社会及其敌人》(The Ideal Society and its Enemies)进行了非常有利的评价,他表示“费尔伯恩已经为未来一段时间的辩论定下了条件。他的术语、统计数据和年表都将受到该领域专家的质疑。但他所使用的类别无疑将照亮20世纪的可比研究——也许会给费尔伯恩本人带来惊喜在同一份出版物中,罗洛·阿诺德开始了这一挑战,尤其是对费尔伯恩的统计数据,质疑他所使用的短暂数字诺曼比和马尔顿。《理想社会及其敌人》的争论和节奏都很激烈。费尔伯恩概述了19世纪新西兰的各种解释,然后拒绝了这些解释,然后提出了自己的原子化论点。他的书无疑是帕克哈史学中最重要的近期作品之一。因此,至关重要的是并批判性地评估其核心论点的有效性,现在就这样做,在19世纪帕克哈社会的费尔伯恩传说根深蒂固之前。我一直在霍克湾从事塔拉代尔的历史研究。今天,塔拉代尔是纳皮尔的郊区,但在我工作的18861930年,这里是一个相当独立的地区,居民从未超过3000人。塔拉代尔为我们提供了一个在特定地方检验费尔伯恩提出的一般理论的机会。正如沃德预测的那样,当塔拉代尔遇到理想社会及其敌人时,我打算质疑费尔伯恩的术语、统计数据和年表。费尔伯恩术语的两个方面我将首先提出质疑:他对原子化的概念,以及他对当地社区概念的使用和拒绝。至少从20世纪80年代初开始,费尔伯恩就一直在推广原子化的理念。他认为,移民人口的性质,再加上他们在新西兰面临的情况,意味着19世纪下半叶,特别是1850-80年代的人是原子化的。他们独自或在没有大家庭支持的情况下前往新西兰。移民的男性多于女性,移民往往是年轻人:新西兰帕克哈的人口年龄和性别失衡。抵达后,这些人没有安顿下来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some Observations on the Status of Maori Women The East Coast Petroleum Wars: Raupatu and the Politics of Oil in 1860s New Zealand Songlines from Aotearoa Standing Upright Here: New Zealand in the Nuclear Age, 1945–1990 by Malcolm Templeton (review) Tuki’s Universe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1