Finding Aid Aggregation: Toward a Robust Future

Q3 Arts and Humanities American Archivist Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.556
Jodi Allison-Bunnell
{"title":"Finding Aid Aggregation: Toward a Robust Future","authors":"Jodi Allison-Bunnell","doi":"10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the last twenty-five years, cultural heritage professionals have formed aggregations—of finding aids, digital object metadata, or related forms of description—in order to overcome barriers to creating and presenting structured, consistent, and interoperable description and to enable expanded access. Now most of these aggregators are struggling to update their infrastructure, meet user needs for access to archival collections, and engage with some of the most promising conceptual, technical, and structural advances in the field. In 2018–2019, the “Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network” planning initiative identified what aggregation has accomplished, articulated the key challenges facing aggregators, identified which areas could benefit from collaborative work, and created a vision for that work. With the near-completion of a research and demonstration by the California Digital Library, “Building a National Finding Aid Network” (NAFAN), the project and the archival profession have an opportunity to learn from the past and transform access to cultural heritage. However, none of the large-scale aggregations in the United States present a viable model for sustainability. Sustainability will become possible if they overcome the factors that have limited the success of aggregation so far. These include an over-focus on implementing new technical standards and infrastructure and under-focus on the real limitations: lack of knowledge of end user needs and attempting to accomplish too much without the needed resources. By drawing on both the background research described in this article and the further research conducted during the current NAFAN project, this and other cultural heritage enterprises have an opportunity to create a future in which access to cultural heritage is equalized and expanded for both institutions and end users.","PeriodicalId":39979,"journal":{"name":"American Archivist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last twenty-five years, cultural heritage professionals have formed aggregations—of finding aids, digital object metadata, or related forms of description—in order to overcome barriers to creating and presenting structured, consistent, and interoperable description and to enable expanded access. Now most of these aggregators are struggling to update their infrastructure, meet user needs for access to archival collections, and engage with some of the most promising conceptual, technical, and structural advances in the field. In 2018–2019, the “Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network” planning initiative identified what aggregation has accomplished, articulated the key challenges facing aggregators, identified which areas could benefit from collaborative work, and created a vision for that work. With the near-completion of a research and demonstration by the California Digital Library, “Building a National Finding Aid Network” (NAFAN), the project and the archival profession have an opportunity to learn from the past and transform access to cultural heritage. However, none of the large-scale aggregations in the United States present a viable model for sustainability. Sustainability will become possible if they overcome the factors that have limited the success of aggregation so far. These include an over-focus on implementing new technical standards and infrastructure and under-focus on the real limitations: lack of knowledge of end user needs and attempting to accomplish too much without the needed resources. By drawing on both the background research described in this article and the further research conducted during the current NAFAN project, this and other cultural heritage enterprises have an opportunity to create a future in which access to cultural heritage is equalized and expanded for both institutions and end users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找援助聚合:走向一个强大的未来
在过去的25年里,文化遗产专业人员形成了一个集合——寻找辅助工具、数字对象元数据或相关的描述形式——以克服创建和呈现结构化、一致性和可互操作的描述的障碍,并扩大访问范围。现在,这些聚合器中的大多数都在努力更新其基础设施,满足用户访问档案收藏的需求,并参与该领域一些最有前景的概念、技术和结构进步。2018年至2019年,“建立国家档案查找援助网络”规划倡议确定了聚合所取得的成就,阐明了聚合者面临的关键挑战,确定了哪些领域可以从合作工作中受益,并为这项工作制定了愿景。随着加州数字图书馆“建立国家搜寻援助网络”(NAPAN)的研究和演示工作即将完成,该项目和档案行业有机会从过去吸取教训,改变文化遗产的获取方式。然而,在美国,没有一个大规模的聚集提供了一个可行的可持续发展模式。如果他们克服了迄今为止限制聚合成功的因素,可持续性将成为可能。其中包括过度关注实施新的技术标准和基础设施,而不关注真正的局限性:缺乏对最终用户需求的了解,以及试图在没有所需资源的情况下完成太多任务。通过借鉴本文所述的背景研究和当前NAPAN项目期间进行的进一步研究,该文化遗产企业和其他文化遗产企业有机会创造一个未来,使机构和最终用户都能平等和扩大获得文化遗产的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Archivist
American Archivist Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
College and University Archivists: Doing It All for Less Building a Baseline of Archival Data with A*CENSUS II “Sometimes I feel like they hate us”: The Society of American Archivists and Graduate Archival Education in the Twenty-first Century Rescued from Oblivion: Historical Cultures in the Early United States What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1