Confirming the systematic position of two enigmatic shrimps, Amphionides and Procarididae (Crustacea: Decapoda)

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Zoologica Scripta Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1111/zsc.12509
Yaqin Wang, K. Ma, L. Tsang, Kaori Wakabayashi, T. Chan, S. De Grave, K. Chu
{"title":"Confirming the systematic position of two enigmatic shrimps, Amphionides and Procarididae (Crustacea: Decapoda)","authors":"Yaqin Wang, K. Ma, L. Tsang, Kaori Wakabayashi, T. Chan, S. De Grave, K. Chu","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since their discovery, the systematic placement of two shrimp taxa, Amphionides and Procarididae, has been controversial. Both exhibit primitive features yet also possessing caridean traits. Amphionides was initially classified as a monotypic genus in the order Amphionidacea, while Procarididae was the only family in the superfamily Procaridoidea. Recent molecular studies have presented evidence that Amphionides is a larval form of pandalid shrimp, while Procaridoidea is elevated to an infraorder of Decapoda. To confirm the systematic status of the two shrimps, we report here the complete mitogenome sequences of Amphionides reynaudii and Procaris hawaiana. The phylogenetic tree of mitochondrial protein‐coding genes from all decapod infraorders provides strong support for the systematic position of procaridid shrimp as the sister of Caridea, and the evolutionary divergence of the sequences substantiates the infraordinal status of Procarididae. The tree also verifies Amphionides as a caridean genus in Pandalidae, and further analysis using eight gene markers from the family indicates the sister relationship between Amphionides and Dorodotes. We also review the morphological characters of these two taxa and identify morphological features in support of their respective systematic status.","PeriodicalId":49334,"journal":{"name":"Zoologica Scripta","volume":"50 1","pages":"812 - 823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since their discovery, the systematic placement of two shrimp taxa, Amphionides and Procarididae, has been controversial. Both exhibit primitive features yet also possessing caridean traits. Amphionides was initially classified as a monotypic genus in the order Amphionidacea, while Procarididae was the only family in the superfamily Procaridoidea. Recent molecular studies have presented evidence that Amphionides is a larval form of pandalid shrimp, while Procaridoidea is elevated to an infraorder of Decapoda. To confirm the systematic status of the two shrimps, we report here the complete mitogenome sequences of Amphionides reynaudii and Procaris hawaiana. The phylogenetic tree of mitochondrial protein‐coding genes from all decapod infraorders provides strong support for the systematic position of procaridid shrimp as the sister of Caridea, and the evolutionary divergence of the sequences substantiates the infraordinal status of Procarididae. The tree also verifies Amphionides as a caridean genus in Pandalidae, and further analysis using eight gene markers from the family indicates the sister relationship between Amphionides and Dorodotes. We also review the morphological characters of these two taxa and identify morphological features in support of their respective systematic status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确认两种神秘虾的系统位置,两栖纲和原虾科(甲壳纲:十足目)
自从它们被发现以来,两栖目和原虾科这两个虾分类群的系统定位一直存在争议。两者都表现出原始的特征,但也具有卡里亚人的特征。两栖纲最初被归类为两栖目中的一个单型属,而原蛛科是原蛛总科中唯一的一个科。最近的分子研究表明,两栖纲是pandalid虾的一种幼虫形式,而原足目则被提升为十足目的一个亚目。为了证实这两种虾的系统状态,我们在这里报道了雷氏两栖动物和哈氏原虫的完整有丝分裂基因组序列。所有十足目下目线粒体蛋白质编码基因的系统发育树为原虾作为Caridea姐妹的系统地位提供了有力的支持,序列的进化差异证实了原虾科的下目地位。这棵树还证实了两栖纲是Pandalidae中的一个脊属,使用该科的八个基因标记进行的进一步分析表明两栖纲和Dorodotes之间存在姐妹关系。我们还回顾了这两个分类群的形态学特征,并确定了支持其各自系统地位的形态学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologica Scripta
Zoologica Scripta 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologica Scripta publishes papers in animal systematics and phylogeny, i.e. studies of evolutionary relationships among taxa, and the origin and evolution of biological diversity. Papers can also deal with ecological interactions and geographic distributions (phylogeography) if the results are placed in a wider phylogenetic/systematic/evolutionary context. Zoologica Scripta encourages papers on the development of methods for all aspects of phylogenetic inference and biological nomenclature/classification. Articles published in Zoologica Scripta must be original and present either theoretical or empirical studies of interest to a broad audience in systematics and phylogeny. Purely taxonomic papers, like species descriptions without being placed in a wider systematic/phylogenetic context, will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Delimiting species boundaries within the Babyloniidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neogastropoda) using multi‐locus phylogenetic analysis A non‐monophyly of ‘crowned’ Daphnia (Ctenodaphnia) Dybowski et Grochowski, 1895 (Cladocera: Daphniidae): From genomes to morphology Description of a new genus and species of deep‐sea mysids (Malacostraca, Peracarida, Mysida) from the Caroline Ridge, Northwest Pacific, with a systematic analysis of the order A phylogeographic analysis of the North American medicinal leech, Macrobdella decora (Say, 1824) Conservation genetics of barbel species (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) facing hybridization and introgression along an elevational gradient in protected areas of northern Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1