Profile of academic entrepreneurship in Brazil

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Innovation & Management Review Pub Date : 2018-10-15 DOI:10.1108/inmr-07-2018-0054
Adriana Bin, M. O. Gavira, Jessica Botelho Figueira, Taynan Mariano Bezerra de Carvalho, S. Salles-Filho, F. Colugnati
{"title":"Profile of academic entrepreneurship in Brazil","authors":"Adriana Bin, M. O. Gavira, Jessica Botelho Figueira, Taynan Mariano Bezerra de Carvalho, S. Salles-Filho, F. Colugnati","doi":"10.1108/inmr-07-2018-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors collected data from a more comprehensive research, whose objective was to evaluate the scholarship programmes of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). For data collection, the authors used an online questionnaire, pre-filled with information from the Lattes Curriculum of the sample individuals, as well as information obtained from FAPESP and from coordination for the improvement of higher education personnel. The response rate of the questionnaires was 21 per cent. The authors sought to explore the variables regarding entrepreneurial activities carried out by former scholarship holders, by relating them to other key variables identified in the literature review and explained in the hypotheses.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that entrepreneurship rates decrease with the higher academic level of the researcher; in general, academic entrepreneurs come from families with a good financial situation, and applied sciences are the areas of knowledge with more entrepreneurs.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDespite the great number of theoretical and empirical studies found in the literature on entrepreneurship and academic entrepreneurship, there is still a shortage of practical studies on this latter topic in Brazil. This gap is even more evident when the authors consider the significant growth of entrepreneurial activity in the country in the past years. This paper contributes to fill this gap, and it aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.\n","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/inmr-07-2018-0054","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-07-2018-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data from a more comprehensive research, whose objective was to evaluate the scholarship programmes of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). For data collection, the authors used an online questionnaire, pre-filled with information from the Lattes Curriculum of the sample individuals, as well as information obtained from FAPESP and from coordination for the improvement of higher education personnel. The response rate of the questionnaires was 21 per cent. The authors sought to explore the variables regarding entrepreneurial activities carried out by former scholarship holders, by relating them to other key variables identified in the literature review and explained in the hypotheses. Findings The results indicate that entrepreneurship rates decrease with the higher academic level of the researcher; in general, academic entrepreneurs come from families with a good financial situation, and applied sciences are the areas of knowledge with more entrepreneurs. Originality/value Despite the great number of theoretical and empirical studies found in the literature on entrepreneurship and academic entrepreneurship, there is still a shortage of practical studies on this latter topic in Brazil. This gap is even more evident when the authors consider the significant growth of entrepreneurial activity in the country in the past years. This paper contributes to fill this gap, and it aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西学术创业概况
本文旨在了解在圣保罗学术环境状态下,学术型企业家、非学术型企业家和非企业家形象的差异。设计/方法/方法作者从一项更全面的研究中收集数据,其目的是评估圣保罗研究基金会(FAPESP)的奖学金项目。在数据收集方面,作者使用了一份在线问卷,预先填写了样本个人的拿铁课程信息,以及FAPESP和高等教育人员改进协调获得的信息。问卷的回复率为21%。作者试图通过将前奖学金获得者开展的创业活动与文献综述中确定并在假设中解释的其他关键变量联系起来,探索与这些变量有关的变量。结果表明:创业率随学术水平的提高而降低;一般来说,学术型企业家来自经济状况良好的家庭,而应用科学是企业家较多的知识领域。独创性/价值尽管在创业和学术创业的文献中发现了大量的理论和实证研究,但在巴西,关于后者的实际研究仍然不足。当作者考虑到过去几年该国创业活动的显著增长时,这种差距就更加明显了。本文旨在填补这一空白,了解在圣保罗学术环境状态下,学术型企业家、非学术型企业家和非企业家形象的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The nexus between management control systems, firm performance, green innovation and social media networking in Indonesian real estate companies Does eco-innovation lead to company growth? Dynamics of actors in innovation ecosystems' analytical structures Technological adoption: the case of PIX in Brazil HR innovation through inter-organizational HR collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1